Management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: A national multicenter prospective cohort.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Emmanuel Pardo, Emmanuel Futier, Laurent Muller, Guillaume Besch, Fanny Vardon-Bounes, Eric Kipnis, Sigismond Lasocki, Stanislas Ledochowski, Evelina Ochin, Jeremy Bourenne, Guillaume Grillet, Adrien Auvet, Armand Mekontso Dessap, Cédric Bruel, Yoann Launey, Maxence Fiorillo, Matthieu Jabaudon, Thomas Godet, Aurelien Mulliez, Jean-Michel Constantin
{"title":"Management of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: A national multicenter prospective cohort.","authors":"Emmanuel Pardo, Emmanuel Futier, Laurent Muller, Guillaume Besch, Fanny Vardon-Bounes, Eric Kipnis, Sigismond Lasocki, Stanislas Ledochowski, Evelina Ochin, Jeremy Bourenne, Guillaume Grillet, Adrien Auvet, Armand Mekontso Dessap, Cédric Bruel, Yoann Launey, Maxence Fiorillo, Matthieu Jabaudon, Thomas Godet, Aurelien Mulliez, Jean-Michel Constantin","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) occurs in 10% of intensive care unit (ICU) stays and worsens clinical outcomes. Despite its significance, no specific guidelines exist for the general ICU population. Our study investigates potential therapeutic approaches to NOAF, focusing on the rhythmic and haemodynamic outcomes associated with dedicated strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In our prospective multicentre cohort study, we included adult patients admitted to 33 ICUs in France, exhibiting at least one episode of NOAF. Exclusions included permanent and post-cardiac/thoracic surgery AF. Data on demographics, clinical history, haemodynamic monitoring, and treatment choice for NOAF episodes were prospectively recorded. Heart rate, blood pressure, and rhythm status were assessed immediately before, at +5, +30, +60 minutes, and +24 hours after NOAF onset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between May and December 2019, 453 ICU patients with 735 NOAF episodes were included. Therapeutic approaches included wait-and-see (n = 159 (22%)), IV fluid (n = 338 (46%)), magnesium (n = 299 (41%)), amiodarone (n = 295 (40%)), and beta blockers (n = 73 (10%)); alone or combined in 354 episodes (61%). Electric cardioversion, preferred for poor haemodynamic tolerance, was most effective for sinus rhythm conversion at +1 h (n = 17/30 (57%)). Heart rate and rhythm control were achieved at 87% (n = 588/674) and 80% (n = 259/654) at +24 h, with no significant difference between the strategies. On ICU discharge, 48 (13%) patients remained in AF; independent predictors included age, obesity, prior stroke, and hypercholesterolemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapeutic approaches for NOAF in ICU patients were heterogeneous, with nearly a quarter managed by a wait-and-see approach. Most strategies achieved rhythm and rate control within 24 hours. These findings highlight the frequent transient nature of NOAF episodes and support the need for individualized treatment decisions, particularly in unstable patients and those at risk for persistent AF. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03977883 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03977883?term=NCT03977883&rank=1).</p>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101617"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) occurs in 10% of intensive care unit (ICU) stays and worsens clinical outcomes. Despite its significance, no specific guidelines exist for the general ICU population. Our study investigates potential therapeutic approaches to NOAF, focusing on the rhythmic and haemodynamic outcomes associated with dedicated strategies.

Methods: In our prospective multicentre cohort study, we included adult patients admitted to 33 ICUs in France, exhibiting at least one episode of NOAF. Exclusions included permanent and post-cardiac/thoracic surgery AF. Data on demographics, clinical history, haemodynamic monitoring, and treatment choice for NOAF episodes were prospectively recorded. Heart rate, blood pressure, and rhythm status were assessed immediately before, at +5, +30, +60 minutes, and +24 hours after NOAF onset.

Results: Between May and December 2019, 453 ICU patients with 735 NOAF episodes were included. Therapeutic approaches included wait-and-see (n = 159 (22%)), IV fluid (n = 338 (46%)), magnesium (n = 299 (41%)), amiodarone (n = 295 (40%)), and beta blockers (n = 73 (10%)); alone or combined in 354 episodes (61%). Electric cardioversion, preferred for poor haemodynamic tolerance, was most effective for sinus rhythm conversion at +1 h (n = 17/30 (57%)). Heart rate and rhythm control were achieved at 87% (n = 588/674) and 80% (n = 259/654) at +24 h, with no significant difference between the strategies. On ICU discharge, 48 (13%) patients remained in AF; independent predictors included age, obesity, prior stroke, and hypercholesterolemia.

Conclusions: Therapeutic approaches for NOAF in ICU patients were heterogeneous, with nearly a quarter managed by a wait-and-see approach. Most strategies achieved rhythm and rate control within 24 hours. These findings highlight the frequent transient nature of NOAF episodes and support the need for individualized treatment decisions, particularly in unstable patients and those at risk for persistent AF. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03977883 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03977883?term=NCT03977883&rank=1).

危重患者新发房颤的管理:一项全国多中心前瞻性队列研究。
背景:新发心房颤动(NOAF)发生在10%的重症监护病房(ICU)住院患者中,并使临床预后恶化。尽管具有重要意义,但对于普通ICU人群尚无具体的指南。我们的研究探讨了NOAF的潜在治疗方法,重点关注与专用策略相关的节律和血流动力学结果。方法:在我们的前瞻性多中心队列研究中,我们纳入了法国33个icu收治的至少一次NOAF发作的成年患者。排除永久性和心脏/胸外科手术后房颤。前瞻性记录NOAF发作的人口统计学、临床病史、血流动力学监测和治疗选择数据。在NOAF发病前、+5、+30、+60分钟和+24小时评估心率、血压和节律状态。结果:2019年5月至12月,纳入453例NOAF发作735次的ICU患者。治疗方法包括静观治疗(n = 159(22%))、静脉输液(n = 338(46%))、镁(n = 299(41%))、胺碘酮(n = 295(40%))和受体阻滞剂(n = 73 (10%));单独或联合播出354集(61%)。对于血流动力学耐受性差的患者首选电复律,在+1 h时对窦性心律转换最有效(n = 17/30(57%))。在+24 h时,心率和节律控制分别达到87% (n = 588/674)和80% (n = 259/654),两种策略之间无显著差异。出院时,48例(13%)患者仍为房颤;独立预测因素包括年龄、肥胖、既往中风和高胆固醇血症。结论:ICU患者NOAF的治疗方法是不同的,近四分之一的患者采用观望方法。大多数策略在24小时内实现了节奏和速率控制。这些发现强调了NOAF发作频繁的短暂性,并支持个性化治疗决策的必要性,特别是在不稳定患者和有持续性AF风险的患者中。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03977883 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03977883?term=NCT03977883&rank=1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信