{"title":"Systemic Inequities in Health Care: Lessons Learned From Black People With IDD and Their Care Partners.","authors":"Khalilah Robinson Johnson, Seth Mitchell, Rebecca Parkin, Kierra Peak, Courtney Chavis, Shea Cleveland, Kylah Comer, Charley Cross, Tracey Hawkins, Chinno Ingram, Tajze Johnson, Alicia Jones","doi":"10.1353/cpr.2025.a970151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are disproportionately impacted by health disparities and endure distinctive systemic challenges as a result of their intersecting identities.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This manuscript describes a collaborative project between university researchers, people with IDD and their care partners, and providers to understand contextual and individual characteristics that influence equitable health services access and use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The project follows a critical participatory action research approach to address issues of power and equity at the intersections of race, gender, and disability. Data collection strategies included individual semi-structured interviews and focus groups, as well as interactive activities to facilitate deeper discussion.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>We describe strategies to manage challenges of delayed recruitment, power sharing, equitable and inclusive engagement, and dissemination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lessons learned underscore the diverse experiential expertise of Black people with IDD, their care partners, and providers in the co-creation of knowledge, the importance of opportunities for partners from different stakeholder groups to cultivate relationships as part of the research process, co-reflexivity as instrumental to assessing and reassessing engagement processes in real time, and implementation of inclusive strategies for participation in dissemination activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":"19 3","pages":"297-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2025.a970151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Black people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are disproportionately impacted by health disparities and endure distinctive systemic challenges as a result of their intersecting identities.
Objectives: This manuscript describes a collaborative project between university researchers, people with IDD and their care partners, and providers to understand contextual and individual characteristics that influence equitable health services access and use.
Methods: The project follows a critical participatory action research approach to address issues of power and equity at the intersections of race, gender, and disability. Data collection strategies included individual semi-structured interviews and focus groups, as well as interactive activities to facilitate deeper discussion.
Lessons learned: We describe strategies to manage challenges of delayed recruitment, power sharing, equitable and inclusive engagement, and dissemination.
Conclusions: Lessons learned underscore the diverse experiential expertise of Black people with IDD, their care partners, and providers in the co-creation of knowledge, the importance of opportunities for partners from different stakeholder groups to cultivate relationships as part of the research process, co-reflexivity as instrumental to assessing and reassessing engagement processes in real time, and implementation of inclusive strategies for participation in dissemination activities.