Systemic Inequities in Health Care: Lessons Learned From Black People With IDD and Their Care Partners.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Khalilah Robinson Johnson, Seth Mitchell, Rebecca Parkin, Kierra Peak, Courtney Chavis, Shea Cleveland, Kylah Comer, Charley Cross, Tracey Hawkins, Chinno Ingram, Tajze Johnson, Alicia Jones
{"title":"Systemic Inequities in Health Care: Lessons Learned From Black People With IDD and Their Care Partners.","authors":"Khalilah Robinson Johnson, Seth Mitchell, Rebecca Parkin, Kierra Peak, Courtney Chavis, Shea Cleveland, Kylah Comer, Charley Cross, Tracey Hawkins, Chinno Ingram, Tajze Johnson, Alicia Jones","doi":"10.1353/cpr.2025.a970151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are disproportionately impacted by health disparities and endure distinctive systemic challenges as a result of their intersecting identities.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This manuscript describes a collaborative project between university researchers, people with IDD and their care partners, and providers to understand contextual and individual characteristics that influence equitable health services access and use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The project follows a critical participatory action research approach to address issues of power and equity at the intersections of race, gender, and disability. Data collection strategies included individual semi-structured interviews and focus groups, as well as interactive activities to facilitate deeper discussion.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>We describe strategies to manage challenges of delayed recruitment, power sharing, equitable and inclusive engagement, and dissemination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lessons learned underscore the diverse experiential expertise of Black people with IDD, their care partners, and providers in the co-creation of knowledge, the importance of opportunities for partners from different stakeholder groups to cultivate relationships as part of the research process, co-reflexivity as instrumental to assessing and reassessing engagement processes in real time, and implementation of inclusive strategies for participation in dissemination activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":"19 3","pages":"297-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2025.a970151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Black people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are disproportionately impacted by health disparities and endure distinctive systemic challenges as a result of their intersecting identities.

Objectives: This manuscript describes a collaborative project between university researchers, people with IDD and their care partners, and providers to understand contextual and individual characteristics that influence equitable health services access and use.

Methods: The project follows a critical participatory action research approach to address issues of power and equity at the intersections of race, gender, and disability. Data collection strategies included individual semi-structured interviews and focus groups, as well as interactive activities to facilitate deeper discussion.

Lessons learned: We describe strategies to manage challenges of delayed recruitment, power sharing, equitable and inclusive engagement, and dissemination.

Conclusions: Lessons learned underscore the diverse experiential expertise of Black people with IDD, their care partners, and providers in the co-creation of knowledge, the importance of opportunities for partners from different stakeholder groups to cultivate relationships as part of the research process, co-reflexivity as instrumental to assessing and reassessing engagement processes in real time, and implementation of inclusive strategies for participation in dissemination activities.

医疗保健中的系统性不平等:从患有缺乏症的黑人及其护理伙伴那里吸取的教训。
背景:患有智力和发育障碍(IDD)的黑人受到健康差异的不成比例的影响,并且由于他们的交叉身份而承受着独特的系统性挑战。目的:本文描述了大学研究人员、IDD患者及其护理伙伴和提供者之间的一个合作项目,以了解影响公平卫生服务获取和使用的环境和个人特征。方法:该项目采用关键的参与性行动研究方法来解决种族、性别和残疾交叉领域的权力与公平问题。数据收集策略包括个人半结构化访谈和焦点小组,以及促进深入讨论的互动活动。经验教训:我们描述了应对延迟招聘、权力分享、公平和包容性参与以及传播等挑战的战略。结论:吸取的经验教训强调了患有IDD的黑人、他们的护理伙伴和提供者在共同创造知识方面的不同经验专长,不同利益相关者群体的合作伙伴在研究过程中培养关系的机会的重要性,共同反身性作为实时评估和重新评估参与过程的工具,以及实施参与传播活动的包容性战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信