Tools for assessing professional identity in health professions education: a scoping review.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICAL ETHICS
Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18502/jmehm.v17i13.18665
Zahra Sadat Tabatabaei, Homayoun Amini, Mahboobeh Khabaz Mafinejad
{"title":"Tools for assessing professional identity in health professions education: a scoping review.","authors":"Zahra Sadat Tabatabaei, Homayoun Amini, Mahboobeh Khabaz Mafinejad","doi":"10.18502/jmehm.v17i13.18665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to the complexity and multidimensional nature of professional identity assessment in health professions education, it is essential to establish appropriate criteria. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review to explore the current knowledge in this process and map the directions for future research. The present review was based on the five-step framework of Arksey and O'Malley. Eligible articles were examined using descriptive analysis of studies on the characteristics and psychometrics of the tools for professional identity assessment and their underlying theories. After an extensive search, 9,924 studies were identified, 162 of which were selected for full-text review, and finally, 17 articles qualified for inclusion in the study. For the most part, the target group consisted of studies on nursing and medical students. In 14 of the included studies, tools and psychometric properties were mentioned. Most professional identity assessment tools were designed or developed based on identity theories, particularly the social identity theory and Kagan's constructive-developmental theory, which were used more often than others. This scoping review will help researchers to choose or develop reliable and valid tools under clear conceptual and theoretical frameworks to assess the formation and development of professional identity in health professions education.</p>","PeriodicalId":45276,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v17i13.18665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the complexity and multidimensional nature of professional identity assessment in health professions education, it is essential to establish appropriate criteria. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review to explore the current knowledge in this process and map the directions for future research. The present review was based on the five-step framework of Arksey and O'Malley. Eligible articles were examined using descriptive analysis of studies on the characteristics and psychometrics of the tools for professional identity assessment and their underlying theories. After an extensive search, 9,924 studies were identified, 162 of which were selected for full-text review, and finally, 17 articles qualified for inclusion in the study. For the most part, the target group consisted of studies on nursing and medical students. In 14 of the included studies, tools and psychometric properties were mentioned. Most professional identity assessment tools were designed or developed based on identity theories, particularly the social identity theory and Kagan's constructive-developmental theory, which were used more often than others. This scoping review will help researchers to choose or develop reliable and valid tools under clear conceptual and theoretical frameworks to assess the formation and development of professional identity in health professions education.

评估卫生专业教育中职业认同的工具:范围审查
由于卫生专业教育中职业认同评估的复杂性和多维性,必须制定适当的标准。因此,我们进行了范围综述,以探索目前在这一过程中的知识,并规划未来的研究方向。目前的审查是基于Arksey和O'Malley的五步框架。通过对职业认同评估工具及其基础理论的特征和心理测量学研究的描述性分析,对符合条件的文章进行了检查。经过广泛的检索,共鉴定出9924篇研究,其中162篇入选全文审阅,最终有17篇文章符合纳入本研究的条件。在大多数情况下,目标群体包括护理和医学生的研究。在纳入的14项研究中,提到了工具和心理测量特性。大多数专业身份评估工具都是基于身份理论设计或开发的,尤其是社会身份理论和卡根的建构-发展理论,这两种理论的使用频率高于其他理论。这将有助于研究者在清晰的概念和理论框架下选择或开发可靠有效的工具来评估卫生专业教育中职业认同的形成和发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信