Social Norms and Medical Students' Engagement With Cadaveric Dissection: A Qualitative Study and Integrated Model of Cadaveric Engagement (IMCE Model).

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Johnson Nyeko Oloya, Micheal Okello, Ian Guyton Munabi
{"title":"Social Norms and Medical Students' Engagement With Cadaveric Dissection: A Qualitative Study and Integrated Model of Cadaveric Engagement (IMCE Model).","authors":"Johnson Nyeko Oloya, Micheal Okello, Ian Guyton Munabi","doi":"10.1177/23821205251378866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cadaveric dissection is vital in medical education, offering essential hands-on experience in human anatomy. With cadavers regarded as the \"first teacher,\" students confront the realities of death early in their training. All medical students are expected to participate actively in dissections. However, inconsistencies in attendance and engagement are common. In some cases, cadavers are abandoned midway through the course, possibly due to psychological, social, or structural barriers. Understanding medical students' attitudes and perceived social norms toward cadaveric dissection is crucial for improving educational experiences and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the attitude and subjective norm of medical students at Makerere University toward cadaveric dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative study design was employed, using seven Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with first- and second-year medical students. Participants were purposefully selected to ensure diversity in gender and academic experience. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. Ethical approval was obtained, and measures to ensure participant anonymity and psychological support were implemented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students' attitudes toward cadaveric dissection varied from strong enthusiasm and appreciation of its educational value to anxiety, fear, and emotional discomfort. While some viewed dissection as essential for learning, others expressed moral, religious, and psychological concerns. State of cadavers, peer influence, faculty support, and cultural beliefs, significantly influenced students change of attitude resulting to active participation or disengagement with cadaveric dissections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings informed the development of the Integrated Model of Cadaveric Engagement, which highlights the complex interplay of psychological, social, and structural factors influencing dissection behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251378866"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251378866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cadaveric dissection is vital in medical education, offering essential hands-on experience in human anatomy. With cadavers regarded as the "first teacher," students confront the realities of death early in their training. All medical students are expected to participate actively in dissections. However, inconsistencies in attendance and engagement are common. In some cases, cadavers are abandoned midway through the course, possibly due to psychological, social, or structural barriers. Understanding medical students' attitudes and perceived social norms toward cadaveric dissection is crucial for improving educational experiences and outcomes.

Objective: This study explored the attitude and subjective norm of medical students at Makerere University toward cadaveric dissection.

Methods: Qualitative study design was employed, using seven Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with first- and second-year medical students. Participants were purposefully selected to ensure diversity in gender and academic experience. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. Ethical approval was obtained, and measures to ensure participant anonymity and psychological support were implemented.

Results: Students' attitudes toward cadaveric dissection varied from strong enthusiasm and appreciation of its educational value to anxiety, fear, and emotional discomfort. While some viewed dissection as essential for learning, others expressed moral, religious, and psychological concerns. State of cadavers, peer influence, faculty support, and cultural beliefs, significantly influenced students change of attitude resulting to active participation or disengagement with cadaveric dissections.

Conclusion: Findings informed the development of the Integrated Model of Cadaveric Engagement, which highlights the complex interplay of psychological, social, and structural factors influencing dissection behavior.

社会规范与医学生尸体解剖参与:尸体参与的质性研究与整合模型(IMCE模型)。
背景:尸体解剖在医学教育中是至关重要的,提供必要的人体解剖实践经验。由于尸体被视为“第一任老师”,学生们在训练的早期就面对死亡的现实。所有医学生都应积极参与解剖。然而,出勤率和参与度的不一致是很常见的。在某些情况下,尸体在过程中被遗弃,可能是由于心理,社会或结构障碍。了解医学生对尸体解剖的态度和感知的社会规范对改善教育经验和成果至关重要。目的:探讨马凯雷雷大学医学生对尸体解剖的态度和主观规范。方法:采用质性研究设计,对一、二年级医学生进行7次焦点小组讨论(fgd)。参与者的选择是有目的的,以确保性别和学术经验的多样性。资料逐字抄录,并按主题进行分析。获得伦理批准,并采取措施确保参与者匿名和心理支持。结果:学生对尸体解剖的态度从强烈的热情和对其教育价值的欣赏到焦虑、恐惧和情绪不适。一些人认为解剖是学习的必要条件,另一些人则表达了道德、宗教和心理方面的担忧。尸体状态、同伴影响、教师支持和文化信仰显著影响学生态度的改变,从而导致他们积极参与或脱离尸体解剖。结论:研究结果为尸体接触综合模型的发展提供了信息,该模型强调了影响解剖行为的心理、社会和结构因素的复杂相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信