Christopher Horler, Geraldine Leydon, Lisa Roberts
{"title":"Health care professionals' communication of safety-netting advice to patients with musculoskeletal conditions: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Christopher Horler, Geraldine Leydon, Lisa Roberts","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to summarize the empirical evidence related to safety-netting communication in musculoskeletal health care practice.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Safety-netting involves sharing information with patients to help them identify the need to seek further help from a health care professional if their condition persists or worsens. There is limited guidance for how safety-netting should be delivered to patients with musculoskeletal conditions, which could result in variability in practice and suboptimal patient health outcomes. Understanding the current evidence base will inform further research into developing practice guidance to improve patient care.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Research articles and PhD theses that describe the practice of health care professionals sharing safety-netting advice to adults with musculoskeletal conditions will be eligible for inclusion. Articles focused on care delivered by students will be excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search will be conducted across 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE, AMED, Web of Science, and CINAHL), Google Scholar, PEDro, PhD theses databases, and reference lists of the included studies. The search will be limited to English-language articles published within the last 10 years. A minimum of 2 researchers will screen the titles and abstracts of the literature for eligibility before extracting data independently using an adapted version of the JBI data extraction tool. Data will be analyzed descriptively, and the findings will be reported in a narrative summary with corresponding tables and graphs.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/63w5u.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This review aims to summarize the empirical evidence related to safety-netting communication in musculoskeletal health care practice.
Introduction: Safety-netting involves sharing information with patients to help them identify the need to seek further help from a health care professional if their condition persists or worsens. There is limited guidance for how safety-netting should be delivered to patients with musculoskeletal conditions, which could result in variability in practice and suboptimal patient health outcomes. Understanding the current evidence base will inform further research into developing practice guidance to improve patient care.
Eligibility criteria: Research articles and PhD theses that describe the practice of health care professionals sharing safety-netting advice to adults with musculoskeletal conditions will be eligible for inclusion. Articles focused on care delivered by students will be excluded.
Methods: A systematic literature search will be conducted across 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE, AMED, Web of Science, and CINAHL), Google Scholar, PEDro, PhD theses databases, and reference lists of the included studies. The search will be limited to English-language articles published within the last 10 years. A minimum of 2 researchers will screen the titles and abstracts of the literature for eligibility before extracting data independently using an adapted version of the JBI data extraction tool. Data will be analyzed descriptively, and the findings will be reported in a narrative summary with corresponding tables and graphs.
目的:本综述旨在总结与安全网络通信在肌肉骨骼保健实践中的经验证据。简介:安全网包括与患者共享信息,以帮助他们确定如果他们的病情持续或恶化,是否需要寻求卫生保健专业人员的进一步帮助。关于如何向肌肉骨骼疾病患者提供安全网的指导有限,这可能导致实践中的可变性和患者健康结果不理想。了解目前的证据基础将为进一步研究制定实践指导,以改善患者护理提供信息。入选标准:描述卫生保健专业人员向患有肌肉骨骼疾病的成年人分享安全网建议的实践的研究文章和博士论文将有资格入选。关注学生护理的文章将被排除在外。方法:系统检索4个电子数据库(MEDLINE、AMED、Web of Science、CINAHL)、谷歌Scholar、PEDro、博士论文数据库和纳入研究的参考文献列表。搜索范围将限于过去10年内发表的英文文章。在使用JBI数据提取工具的改编版本独立提取数据之前,至少2名研究人员将筛选文献的标题和摘要以确定是否合格。将对数据进行描述性分析,并将调查结果报告为带有相应表格和图表的叙述性摘要。评审注册:OSF https://osf.io/63w5u。