Validation of an innovative algorithm for detecting self-propulsion in manual wheelchair users.

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Rose Gagnon, Krista L Best, Brandon Alexis Valencia Ariza, François Routhier
{"title":"Validation of an innovative algorithm for detecting self-propulsion in manual wheelchair users.","authors":"Rose Gagnon, Krista L Best, Brandon Alexis Valencia Ariza, François Routhier","doi":"10.1177/20556683251374577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Actimetry is increasingly used to measure physical activity (PA) for manual wheelchair (MWC) users. However, conversion of raw data into interpretable PA outcomes remains imprecise, and the differentiation between propulsion and non-propulsion is challenging. Using a previously developed algorithm, the objectives of this study were to: (1) measure the accuracy of total distance collected, and (2) validate the algorithm's accuracy in differentiating between self-propulsion and non-propulsion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experimental study consisting of two data collection sessions. Actimetry data (Actigraph GT3X+) were collected indoors (controlled conditions) during 100 repetitions (n = 40 MWC propulsion, n = 60 pushing the MWC) over three distances (10, 50 and 100 m). Actimetry data were also collected outdoors (uncontrolled condition) during self-propulsion over 1000 m (10 repetitions). Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) with confidence intervals and accuracy measures (percentage of true value) were conducted for each trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The algorithm measured total distance covered indoors with an excellent accuracy (98.9% to 99.8%). It differentiated between self-propulsion and non-propulsion with an accuracy between 96.2% and 99.2% under controlled condition, and between 91.3% and 100.0% under uncontrolled condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The algorithm tested allowed precise measurement of total distance covered, as well as an excellent discrimination between self-propulsion and non-propulsion.</p><p><strong>Preprint: </strong>Gagnon R, Best KL and Routhier F. Validation of an innovative two-part algorithm for detecting self-propulsion in manual wheelchair users. <i>medRxiv</i> 2024: 2024.2011.2014.24313548. DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.14.24313548.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"12 ","pages":"20556683251374577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683251374577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Actimetry is increasingly used to measure physical activity (PA) for manual wheelchair (MWC) users. However, conversion of raw data into interpretable PA outcomes remains imprecise, and the differentiation between propulsion and non-propulsion is challenging. Using a previously developed algorithm, the objectives of this study were to: (1) measure the accuracy of total distance collected, and (2) validate the algorithm's accuracy in differentiating between self-propulsion and non-propulsion.

Methods: Experimental study consisting of two data collection sessions. Actimetry data (Actigraph GT3X+) were collected indoors (controlled conditions) during 100 repetitions (n = 40 MWC propulsion, n = 60 pushing the MWC) over three distances (10, 50 and 100 m). Actimetry data were also collected outdoors (uncontrolled condition) during self-propulsion over 1000 m (10 repetitions). Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) with confidence intervals and accuracy measures (percentage of true value) were conducted for each trial.

Results: The algorithm measured total distance covered indoors with an excellent accuracy (98.9% to 99.8%). It differentiated between self-propulsion and non-propulsion with an accuracy between 96.2% and 99.2% under controlled condition, and between 91.3% and 100.0% under uncontrolled condition.

Conclusions: The algorithm tested allowed precise measurement of total distance covered, as well as an excellent discrimination between self-propulsion and non-propulsion.

Preprint: Gagnon R, Best KL and Routhier F. Validation of an innovative two-part algorithm for detecting self-propulsion in manual wheelchair users. medRxiv 2024: 2024.2011.2014.24313548. DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.14.24313548.

一种检测手动轮椅使用者自我推进的创新算法的验证。
活动测量法越来越多地用于测量手动轮椅(MWC)使用者的身体活动(PA)。然而,将原始数据转换为可解释的PA结果仍然不精确,并且区分推进和非推进是具有挑战性的。使用先前开发的算法,本研究的目标是:(1)测量收集的总距离的准确性;(2)验证算法在区分自推进和非推进方面的准确性。方法:实验研究,包括两个数据收集阶段。在室内(受控条件下)进行100次重复(n = 40 MWC推进,n = 60推动MWC),在3个距离(10、50和100 m)中收集活动测量数据(Actigraph GT3X+)。在自我推进超过1000米(重复10次)期间,在室外(无控制条件下)收集活动测量数据。对每个试验进行描述性统计(平均值和标准差),并附有置信区间和准确度测量(真实值的百分比)。结果:该算法测量室内覆盖总距离的准确率为98.9% ~ 99.8%。该方法区分自推进和非推进的精度在控制条件下为96.2% ~ 99.2%,在非控制条件下为91.3% ~ 100.0%。结论:所测试的算法可以精确测量所覆盖的总距离,并且可以很好地区分自推进和非推进。预印本:Gagnon R, Best KL和Routhier F.一种检测手动轮椅使用者自我推进的创新两部分算法的验证。medRxiv 2024: 2024.2011.2014.24313548。DOI: 10.1101 / 2024.11.14.24313548。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信