Ex vivo biomechanical testing of a three-dimensional printed titanium plate and spacer construct and 4.5 mm locking compression plate for ventral cervical fusion of C4-C5 in the horse.

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Surgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-29 DOI:10.1111/vsu.70014
Steven Zedler, Chantelle Jukic, Andrew van Eps, Darko Stefanovski, Martin Genton, Fabrice Rossignol
{"title":"Ex vivo biomechanical testing of a three-dimensional printed titanium plate and spacer construct and 4.5 mm locking compression plate for ventral cervical fusion of C4-C5 in the horse.","authors":"Steven Zedler, Chantelle Jukic, Andrew van Eps, Darko Stefanovski, Martin Genton, Fabrice Rossignol","doi":"10.1111/vsu.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the biomechanical properties of a three-dimensional (3D) printed titanium plate and spacer (3DM) and a 4.5 mm broad locking compression plate (LCP) for intervertebral fusion of C4-C5 in the horse.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Ex vivo experimental study.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Twenty-four equine cadaveric cervical spines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four cadaver equine cervical spines were randomly assigned to ventral intervertebral fusion with either 3DM (n = 12) or LCP (n = 12) at C4-C5. Four-point bending tests were performed in flexion (3DM n = 6, LCP n = 6) and extension (3DM n = 6, LCP n = 6) in a single cycle to failure. Yield, failure moment, and stiffness in flexion and extension were compared between the 3DM and LCP groups using a mixed effects linear regression model. Failure mode was compared using penalized logistic regression. The significance level was p ≤ .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Yield, failure moment, and stiffness were similar between LCP and 3DM groups, with no differences in either flexion or extension. In extension, displaced fractures (p = .03) and screw pullout (p = .09) were more common in the LCP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 3DM group had similar yield, failure moment, and stiffness to the LCP group. The LCP constructs were more likely to fail by screw pullout or displaced vertebral fracture in extension. Sample size was a major limitation, so smaller differences in the mechanical variables and failure mode would not have been detected.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>In a cadaver model, the 3DM construct was less likely to fail by displaced fracture when loaded in extension. This warrants in vivo investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1344-1352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.70014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the biomechanical properties of a three-dimensional (3D) printed titanium plate and spacer (3DM) and a 4.5 mm broad locking compression plate (LCP) for intervertebral fusion of C4-C5 in the horse.

Study design: Ex vivo experimental study.

Animals: Twenty-four equine cadaveric cervical spines.

Methods: Twenty-four cadaver equine cervical spines were randomly assigned to ventral intervertebral fusion with either 3DM (n = 12) or LCP (n = 12) at C4-C5. Four-point bending tests were performed in flexion (3DM n = 6, LCP n = 6) and extension (3DM n = 6, LCP n = 6) in a single cycle to failure. Yield, failure moment, and stiffness in flexion and extension were compared between the 3DM and LCP groups using a mixed effects linear regression model. Failure mode was compared using penalized logistic regression. The significance level was p ≤ .05.

Results: Yield, failure moment, and stiffness were similar between LCP and 3DM groups, with no differences in either flexion or extension. In extension, displaced fractures (p = .03) and screw pullout (p = .09) were more common in the LCP group.

Conclusion: The 3DM group had similar yield, failure moment, and stiffness to the LCP group. The LCP constructs were more likely to fail by screw pullout or displaced vertebral fracture in extension. Sample size was a major limitation, so smaller differences in the mechanical variables and failure mode would not have been detected.

Clinical significance: In a cadaver model, the 3DM construct was less likely to fail by displaced fracture when loaded in extension. This warrants in vivo investigation.

三维打印钛板和间隔结构及4.5 mm锁定加压板用于马C4-C5颈椎腹侧融合的离体生物力学试验
目的:比较三维(3D)打印钛板和垫片(3DM)与4.5 mm宽锁定加压板(LCP)用于马C4-C5椎间融合术的生物力学性能。研究设计:体外实验研究。动物:24根马尸体颈椎。方法:24根死马颈椎在C4-C5处随机选择3DM (n = 12)或LCP (n = 12)进行腹侧椎间融合术。4点弯曲试验在单周期内进行屈曲(3DM n = 6, LCP n = 6)和伸展(3DM n = 6, LCP n = 6)直至失效。采用混合效应线性回归模型比较3DM组和LCP组屈曲和伸展时的屈服、破坏力矩和刚度。失效模式采用惩罚逻辑回归进行比较。显著性水平p≤0.05。结果:LCP组和3DM组的屈服、失效力矩和刚度相似,屈伸无差异。伸展时,移位骨折(p = 0.03)和螺钉拔出(p = 0.09)在LCP组中更为常见。结论:3DM组与LCP组具有相似的屈服、失效力矩和刚度。LCP结构更容易因螺钉拔出或椎体骨折移位而失效。样本量是一个主要的限制,因此机械变量和失效模式的较小差异不会被检测到。临床意义:在尸体模型中,3DM结构在拉伸载荷下不太可能因移位骨折而失效。这值得在体内进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信