Columella-Labial Angle Changes Following Septocolumellar Suture and Lateral Crural Overlay Methods in Rhinoplasty.

IF 1 Q3 SURGERY
Nima Dehghani, Xaniar Mahmoudi, Mohadeseh Azarsina, Elham Hosseini
{"title":"Columella-Labial Angle Changes Following Septocolumellar Suture and Lateral Crural Overlay Methods in Rhinoplasty.","authors":"Nima Dehghani, Xaniar Mahmoudi, Mohadeseh Azarsina, Elham Hosseini","doi":"10.61186/wjps.14.2.92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the most important stages in rhinoplasty is the control of nasal tip rotation. Different techniques have been proposed to achieve this goal. We aimed to compare the effects of two methods of Septocolumellar Suture (SCS) and Lateral Crural Overlay (LCO) on nasal tip rotation by measuring of Columella-Labial angle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-blinded clinical trial, 148 patients were selected among the patients who were candidates for rhinoplasty in Sina Hospital in Tehran, Iran 2024. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (each group contained 74 subjects). The patients in the first group were operated on using LCO technique, and the patients in the second group were operated on using SCS technique. Columella-Labial angle of the samples were evaluated using the photographs of the samples before and six months after surgery. The obtained results were compared using SPSS software and t-paired and Mann-Whitney statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean Columella-Labial angle in both groups was more than that before surgery (P<0.001). The mean Columella-Labial angle before surgery in the SCS group were higher than that in LCO group and this difference was significant (P<0.001). The Columella-Labial angle difference was also significant between the two groups after surgery (P = 0.005), and Columella-Labial angle in LCO group was higher than that in SCS group (P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LCO technique increase Columella-Labial angle more than SCS technique. Therefore, it is recommended that LCO technique to be used in patients with who need greater Columella-Labial angle change.</p>","PeriodicalId":23736,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"14 2","pages":"92-97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61186/wjps.14.2.92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the most important stages in rhinoplasty is the control of nasal tip rotation. Different techniques have been proposed to achieve this goal. We aimed to compare the effects of two methods of Septocolumellar Suture (SCS) and Lateral Crural Overlay (LCO) on nasal tip rotation by measuring of Columella-Labial angle.

Methods: In a single-blinded clinical trial, 148 patients were selected among the patients who were candidates for rhinoplasty in Sina Hospital in Tehran, Iran 2024. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (each group contained 74 subjects). The patients in the first group were operated on using LCO technique, and the patients in the second group were operated on using SCS technique. Columella-Labial angle of the samples were evaluated using the photographs of the samples before and six months after surgery. The obtained results were compared using SPSS software and t-paired and Mann-Whitney statistical tests.

Results: The mean Columella-Labial angle in both groups was more than that before surgery (P<0.001). The mean Columella-Labial angle before surgery in the SCS group were higher than that in LCO group and this difference was significant (P<0.001). The Columella-Labial angle difference was also significant between the two groups after surgery (P = 0.005), and Columella-Labial angle in LCO group was higher than that in SCS group (P <0.001).

Conclusion: LCO technique increase Columella-Labial angle more than SCS technique. Therefore, it is recommended that LCO technique to be used in patients with who need greater Columella-Labial angle change.

鼻中隔小柱缝合和外侧脚覆盖法后鼻小柱-唇角的改变。
背景:鼻尖旋转的控制是鼻整形术中最重要的阶段之一。为了实现这一目标,已经提出了不同的技术。通过测量鼻中隔-小柱-唇角,比较两种鼻中隔-小柱缝合(SCS)和脚外侧覆盖(LCO)方法对鼻尖旋转的影响。方法:在2024年伊朗德黑兰新浪医院鼻整形候选者中选取148例患者进行单盲临床试验。患者随机分为两组(每组74例)。第一组患者采用LCO技术,第二组患者采用SCS技术。用手术前和术后6个月的照片评估样本的小柱-唇角。所得结果采用SPSS软件、t-配对和Mann-Whitney统计检验进行比较。结果:两组患者的平均小柱唇角均大于术前(p)。结论:LCO技术比SCS技术更能增加小柱唇角。因此,对于需要较大小柱唇角改变的患者,建议采用LCO技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信