Association between home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions and concurrent use behaviors among dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tobacco Induced Diseases Pub Date : 2025-09-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tid/209376
Vuong V Do, Jidong Huang, Terry F Pechacek, Claire A Spears, David L Ashley, Carla J Berg, Scott R Weaver
{"title":"Association between home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions and concurrent use behaviors among dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes.","authors":"Vuong V Do, Jidong Huang, Terry F Pechacek, Claire A Spears, David L Ashley, Carla J Berg, Scott R Weaver","doi":"10.18332/tid/209376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited data exist on how home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions influence patterns of cigarette and e-cigarette use among individuals who use both products. This study examined the association between home restrictions and the use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes among dual users of these two products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Adult Consumers of Tobacco Study (ACTS), an online, nationwide survey administered during 2020-2021. A sub-sample of 250 dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes was included in this analysis. Outcome variables were concurrent use behaviors, categorized as predominant smokers (daily smoking, e-cigarette use some days), equivalent users (either daily or some days use of both products), and predominant e-cigarette users (daily e-cigarette use, smoking some days), as well as e-cigarette use frequency (daily vs some days). Primary explanatory variables were home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions (both categorized as complete, partial, or no restrictions). Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between restrictions and concurrent use behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly half (46.8%) of dual users reported having complete smoking restrictions in their homes, complete e-cigarette use restrictions (12.8%), and complete restrictions on both (11.2%). Dual users reported having complete home smoking restrictions (vs no restrictions) were more than two times more likely to be predominant e-cigarette users versus equivalent users or predominant smokers (AOR=2.60; 95% CI: 1.30-5.30), after controlling for home e-cigarette use restrictions and other covariates. Neither partial smoking restrictions nor partial e-cigarette use restrictions were associated with concurrent use behaviors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Small proportions of dual users reported having complete smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions adopted in their homes, suggesting a need for promoting the adoption of such restrictions. Moreover, how and why home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions differentially impact use behaviors warrant additional investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"23 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/209376","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Limited data exist on how home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions influence patterns of cigarette and e-cigarette use among individuals who use both products. This study examined the association between home restrictions and the use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes among dual users of these two products.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Adult Consumers of Tobacco Study (ACTS), an online, nationwide survey administered during 2020-2021. A sub-sample of 250 dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes was included in this analysis. Outcome variables were concurrent use behaviors, categorized as predominant smokers (daily smoking, e-cigarette use some days), equivalent users (either daily or some days use of both products), and predominant e-cigarette users (daily e-cigarette use, smoking some days), as well as e-cigarette use frequency (daily vs some days). Primary explanatory variables were home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions (both categorized as complete, partial, or no restrictions). Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between restrictions and concurrent use behaviors.

Results: Nearly half (46.8%) of dual users reported having complete smoking restrictions in their homes, complete e-cigarette use restrictions (12.8%), and complete restrictions on both (11.2%). Dual users reported having complete home smoking restrictions (vs no restrictions) were more than two times more likely to be predominant e-cigarette users versus equivalent users or predominant smokers (AOR=2.60; 95% CI: 1.30-5.30), after controlling for home e-cigarette use restrictions and other covariates. Neither partial smoking restrictions nor partial e-cigarette use restrictions were associated with concurrent use behaviors.

Conclusions: Small proportions of dual users reported having complete smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions adopted in their homes, suggesting a need for promoting the adoption of such restrictions. Moreover, how and why home smoking and e-cigarette use restrictions differentially impact use behaviors warrant additional investigation.

家庭吸烟与电子烟使用限制之间的关系以及香烟和电子烟双重使用者的同时使用行为。
关于家庭吸烟和电子烟使用限制如何影响使用这两种产品的个人的香烟和电子烟使用模式的数据有限。这项研究调查了家庭限制与卷烟和电子烟双重使用者之间的关系。方法:我们对成人烟草消费者研究(ACTS)的数据进行了二次分析,这是一项在2020-2021年期间进行的全国性在线调查。该分析包括250名香烟和电子烟双重使用者的子样本。结果变量是同时使用行为,分为主要吸烟者(每天吸烟,使用电子烟几天),等效用户(每天或几天使用两种产品),主要电子烟用户(每天使用电子烟,吸烟几天),以及电子烟使用频率(每天和几天)。主要的解释变量是家庭吸烟和电子烟使用限制(两者均分为完全限制、部分限制或无限制)。使用多变量逻辑回归来检验限制与并发使用行为之间的关系。结果:近一半(46.8%)的双重使用者报告在家中完全限制吸烟,完全限制使用电子烟(12.8%),以及完全限制两者(11.2%)。在控制了家庭电子烟使用限制和其他协变量后,双重使用者报告有完全的家庭吸烟限制(与没有限制相比)的主要电子烟使用者是同等使用者或主要吸烟者的两倍多(AOR=2.60; 95% CI: 1.30-5.30)。部分吸烟限制和部分电子烟使用限制与同时使用行为无关。结论:一小部分双重使用者报告在家中采用了完全吸烟和电子烟使用限制,这表明有必要促进采用此类限制。此外,家庭吸烟和电子烟使用限制如何以及为什么会对使用行为产生不同的影响,需要进一步的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Induced Diseases
Tobacco Induced Diseases SUBSTANCE ABUSE-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Induced Diseases encompasses all aspects of research related to the prevention and control of tobacco use at a global level. Preventing diseases attributable to tobacco is only one aspect of the journal, whose overall scope is to provide a forum for the publication of research articles that can contribute to reducing the burden of tobacco induced diseases globally. To address this epidemic we believe that there must be an avenue for the publication of research/policy activities on tobacco control initiatives that may be very important at a regional and national level. This approach provides a very important "hands on" service to the tobacco control community at a global scale - as common problems have common solutions. Hence, we see ourselves as "connectors" within this global community. The journal hence encourages the submission of articles from all medical, biological and psychosocial disciplines, ranging from medical and dental clinicians, through health professionals to basic biomedical and clinical scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信