Optimized Conservative Surgical Treatment of Pulmonary Hydatid Cyst: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

Q3 Medicine
Tanaffos Pub Date : 2024-04-01
Abdoulhossein Davoodabadi, Fatemeh Najjarian, Mohammad Java Azadchehr, Esmail Abdorrahhmkashi, Hassan Davoodabadi, Aboulhassan Alijanpour, Babak Haghpanah
{"title":"Optimized Conservative Surgical Treatment of Pulmonary Hydatid Cyst: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.","authors":"Abdoulhossein Davoodabadi, Fatemeh Najjarian, Mohammad Java Azadchehr, Esmail Abdorrahhmkashi, Hassan Davoodabadi, Aboulhassan Alijanpour, Babak Haghpanah","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are some controversies on surgical options for pulmonary hydatid cysts. We analyzed our experience in lung tissue preservation during the surgical treatment and optimal surgical options.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This observational cohort analysis was conducted from July 2008 to July 2022. The Age, sex, clinical manifestation, recurrent rate, hospital length of stay, postoperative complications, and long-term results in each group were assessed. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, Charlson Co-Morbidity Index (CCI), Complexity of surgery, and Clavien-Dindo score were also determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 138 patients, 81case (53.5%) had intact cysts (G1), and the rest were infected cysts which in turn were subdivided into early infected (G2) and cavity suppurated=28 cases (18.4%) as (G3). Group G3 required special attention because the pericyst surface was severely inflamed, dirty, and had pus, so they were subdivided into 3 distinctive groups including G3a, undergone cystectomy, bronchial opening closure alone, G3b group, undergone cystectomy, capitonnage+bronchial opening closure and G3c group, in which pericystectomy also added to previously mentioned procedures. Major complications in the subgroups of G3a were 2 patients and G3b 3 patients, but in the subgroup of G3c, no considerable complications were seen. Cystectomy, closure of major bronchial opening, and capitonnage were done in intact, and early infected cysts. The results of both were the same, with no considerable major complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Capitonnage significantly decreased the complication rate. The optimized approach in both G1 and G2 was: cystectomy, closure of major bronchial opening, and capitonnage. In G3, bronchial opening closure, pericystectomy, and capitonnage were the preferred procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":22247,"journal":{"name":"Tanaffos","volume":"23 4","pages":"355-363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanaffos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are some controversies on surgical options for pulmonary hydatid cysts. We analyzed our experience in lung tissue preservation during the surgical treatment and optimal surgical options.

Materials and methods: This observational cohort analysis was conducted from July 2008 to July 2022. The Age, sex, clinical manifestation, recurrent rate, hospital length of stay, postoperative complications, and long-term results in each group were assessed. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, Charlson Co-Morbidity Index (CCI), Complexity of surgery, and Clavien-Dindo score were also determined.

Results: Out of 138 patients, 81case (53.5%) had intact cysts (G1), and the rest were infected cysts which in turn were subdivided into early infected (G2) and cavity suppurated=28 cases (18.4%) as (G3). Group G3 required special attention because the pericyst surface was severely inflamed, dirty, and had pus, so they were subdivided into 3 distinctive groups including G3a, undergone cystectomy, bronchial opening closure alone, G3b group, undergone cystectomy, capitonnage+bronchial opening closure and G3c group, in which pericystectomy also added to previously mentioned procedures. Major complications in the subgroups of G3a were 2 patients and G3b 3 patients, but in the subgroup of G3c, no considerable complications were seen. Cystectomy, closure of major bronchial opening, and capitonnage were done in intact, and early infected cysts. The results of both were the same, with no considerable major complication.

Conclusion: Capitonnage significantly decreased the complication rate. The optimized approach in both G1 and G2 was: cystectomy, closure of major bronchial opening, and capitonnage. In G3, bronchial opening closure, pericystectomy, and capitonnage were the preferred procedures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肺包虫囊肿的最佳保守手术治疗:回顾性观察队列研究。
背景:肺包虫病的手术选择存在一些争议。我们分析了手术治疗中肺组织保存的经验和最佳手术选择。材料与方法:本观察性队列分析于2008年7月至2022年7月进行。观察两组患者的年龄、性别、临床表现、复发率、住院时间、术后并发症及远期疗效。测定美国麻醉医师协会身体状况、Charlson共发病指数(CCI)、手术复杂性和Clavien-Dindo评分。结果:138例患者中,完整囊肿81例(53.5%)(G1),其余为感染囊肿,再细分为早期感染(G2)和腔化脓28例(18.4%)(G3)。G3组由于包囊表面严重发炎、脏污、有脓,需要特别注意,因此将其细分为3个不同的组:G3a组,行膀胱切除术,单独关闭支气管开口,G3b组,行膀胱切除术,capitonnage+支气管开口关闭,G3c组,其中包囊切除术是在上述手术的基础上进行的。G3a亚组主要并发症2例,G3b亚组主要并发症3例,G3c亚组未见明显并发症。在完整和早期感染的囊肿中进行囊肿切除术,关闭主要支气管开口和capitonche。两者的结果相同,没有明显的主要并发症。结论:capitonation可显著降低并发症发生率。G1和G2的最佳入路均为:膀胱切除术、关闭支气管大开口、capitonne。在G3中,支气管开口闭合、包膜切除术和capitonche是首选手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tanaffos
Tanaffos Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书