Comparison of the accuracy of different cone beam computed tomography systems in measuring the volume of external root resorption.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ayse Gul Oner Talmac, Alaettin Koc
{"title":"Comparison of the accuracy of different cone beam computed tomography systems in measuring the volume of external root resorption.","authors":"Ayse Gul Oner Talmac, Alaettin Koc","doi":"10.26650/eor.20241247459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of root resorption volume measurements among three cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices using various imaging parameters.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 42 external root resorption (ERR) defects were mechanically created on the buccal and palatinal surfaces of the roots of seven extracted human teeth. Volume measurements of the defects were performed using three CBCT devices and six different imaging protocols. CBCT measurements were then compared with those calculated from micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean absolute error values indicated that the rate of measurement accuracies from best to worst was obtained with KaVo 3D eXam (0.125 mm voxel, 0.2 mm voxel, respectively), Orthophos XG 3D (0.1 mm voxel, 0.16 mm voxel, respectively), and Rainbow CT (0.2 mm voxel, 0.3 mm voxel, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between any of the CBCT measurements in comparison to the micro-CT evaluations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although external root resorption is a small object to evaluate using CBCT, larger voxel sizes (e.g., 0.3 mm) of CBCT systems can be employed during scanning without compromising image quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":41993,"journal":{"name":"European Oral Research","volume":"59 2","pages":"77-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20241247459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of root resorption volume measurements among three cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices using various imaging parameters.

Materials and methods: A total of 42 external root resorption (ERR) defects were mechanically created on the buccal and palatinal surfaces of the roots of seven extracted human teeth. Volume measurements of the defects were performed using three CBCT devices and six different imaging protocols. CBCT measurements were then compared with those calculated from micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) images.

Results: The mean absolute error values indicated that the rate of measurement accuracies from best to worst was obtained with KaVo 3D eXam (0.125 mm voxel, 0.2 mm voxel, respectively), Orthophos XG 3D (0.1 mm voxel, 0.16 mm voxel, respectively), and Rainbow CT (0.2 mm voxel, 0.3 mm voxel, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between any of the CBCT measurements in comparison to the micro-CT evaluations.

Conclusion: Although external root resorption is a small object to evaluate using CBCT, larger voxel sizes (e.g., 0.3 mm) of CBCT systems can be employed during scanning without compromising image quality.

不同锥束计算机断层扫描系统测量外根吸收体积的精度比较。
目的:本研究的目的是比较使用不同成像参数的三种锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)设备测量牙根吸收体积的准确性。材料与方法:采用机械方法在7颗拔除的人牙根的颊面和腭面制造42个外牙根吸收缺损。使用三种CBCT设备和六种不同的成像方案进行缺陷的体积测量。然后将CBCT测量值与微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)图像计算值进行比较。结果:平均绝对误差值表明,KaVo 3D eXam(分别为0.125 mm体素、0.2 mm体素)、Orthophos XG 3D(分别为0.1 mm体素、0.16 mm体素)和Rainbow CT(分别为0.2 mm体素、0.3 mm体素)的测量准确率由高到低。与微ct评估相比,CBCT测量结果没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:虽然使用CBCT评估外根吸收是一个小对象,但在扫描过程中可以使用更大的体素(例如0.3 mm)的CBCT系统,而不会影响图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Oral Research
European Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信