Does the use of a ureteral access sheath improve perioperative outcomes in ureteroscopy? A real-world multi-institutional study.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Abdel Bakayoko, Céline Mardelli, Hugo Dupuis, Louis Surlemont, Kevin Saout, Héloïse Ducousso, Hubert Bugel, Sofiane Seddik, Xavier Tillou, Karim Bensalah, Zine-Eddine Khene
{"title":"Does the use of a ureteral access sheath improve perioperative outcomes in ureteroscopy? A real-world multi-institutional study.","authors":"Abdel Bakayoko, Céline Mardelli, Hugo Dupuis, Louis Surlemont, Kevin Saout, Héloïse Ducousso, Hubert Bugel, Sofiane Seddik, Xavier Tillou, Karim Bensalah, Zine-Eddine Khene","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01865-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is commonly performed with a ureteral access sheath (UAS). Our objective was to evaluate the impact of UAS use in patients undergoing RIRS for renal stones. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of all patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stones between January 2017 and December 2018 at six academic medical centers. Patients were stratified according to UAS use. To adjust for baseline differences, we applied inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), a propensity score-based method that balances covariates between groups. A total of 1,177 patients were included: 740 (62.8%) underwent RIRS with a UAS and 437 (37.2%) without. After adjustment, adequate balance was achieved between groups. In IPTW analysis, the stone-free rate (SFR) at three months was comparable between groups (OR = 0.75; 95% CI [0.53-1.08]; p = 0.12). UAS use was associated with longer operative time (estimate = 3.71 min; 95% CI [1.08-7.32]; p = 0.04), lower probability of outpatient procedure (OR = 0.67; 95% CI [0.49-0.91]; p = 0.01), and higher likelihood of postoperative stenting (OR = 3.61; 95% CI [2.72-4.78]; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in overall complications (OR = 1.16; 95% CI [0.68-1.99]; p = 0.57) or major complications (OR = 1.07; 95% CI [0.45-2.57]; p = 0.86). In this large multicenter retrospective study, UAS use during RIRS was associated with a similar stone-free rate but increased perioperative morbidity. These real-world findings suggest that routine UAS use may not always be necessary, although randomized controlled trials are required to define its role more definitively.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01865-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is commonly performed with a ureteral access sheath (UAS). Our objective was to evaluate the impact of UAS use in patients undergoing RIRS for renal stones. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of all patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stones between January 2017 and December 2018 at six academic medical centers. Patients were stratified according to UAS use. To adjust for baseline differences, we applied inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), a propensity score-based method that balances covariates between groups. A total of 1,177 patients were included: 740 (62.8%) underwent RIRS with a UAS and 437 (37.2%) without. After adjustment, adequate balance was achieved between groups. In IPTW analysis, the stone-free rate (SFR) at three months was comparable between groups (OR = 0.75; 95% CI [0.53-1.08]; p = 0.12). UAS use was associated with longer operative time (estimate = 3.71 min; 95% CI [1.08-7.32]; p = 0.04), lower probability of outpatient procedure (OR = 0.67; 95% CI [0.49-0.91]; p = 0.01), and higher likelihood of postoperative stenting (OR = 3.61; 95% CI [2.72-4.78]; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in overall complications (OR = 1.16; 95% CI [0.68-1.99]; p = 0.57) or major complications (OR = 1.07; 95% CI [0.45-2.57]; p = 0.86). In this large multicenter retrospective study, UAS use during RIRS was associated with a similar stone-free rate but increased perioperative morbidity. These real-world findings suggest that routine UAS use may not always be necessary, although randomized controlled trials are required to define its role more definitively.

输尿管导管鞘的使用是否能改善输尿管镜围手术期的预后?一个真实世界的多机构研究。
逆行肾内手术(RIRS)通常在输尿管通路鞘(UAS)下进行。我们的目的是评估UAS在肾结石患者行RIRS的影响。我们对2017年1月至2018年12月期间在6个学术医疗中心接受肾结石RIRS治疗的所有患者进行了一项回顾性多中心队列研究。根据UAS的使用情况对患者进行分层。为了调整基线差异,我们应用了治疗加权逆概率(IPTW),这是一种基于倾向评分的方法,可以平衡组间协变量。共纳入1177例患者:740例(62.8%)接受了伴有UAS的RIRS, 437例(37.2%)没有。调整后,各组之间达到了足够的平衡。在IPTW分析中,3个月时各组无结石率(SFR)具有可比性(OR = 0.75; 95% CI [0.53-1.08]; p = 0.12)。使用UAS与较长的手术时间(估计= 3.71 min; 95% CI [1.08-7.32]; p = 0.04)、较低的门诊手术概率(OR = 0.67; 95% CI [0.49-0.91]; p = 0.01)和较高的术后支架置入可能性(OR = 3.61; 95% CI [2.72-4.78]; p = 0.04)相关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信