The value of intra-articular corticosteroid injection in predicting pain relief following periacetabular osteotomy.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-10 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/jhps/hnaf014
Carter E Hall, David P VanEenenaam, Christopher J DeFrancesco, Naomi Brown, Hannah R Baron, Wudbhav N Sankar
{"title":"The value of intra-articular corticosteroid injection in predicting pain relief following periacetabular osteotomy.","authors":"Carter E Hall, David P VanEenenaam, Christopher J DeFrancesco, Naomi Brown, Hannah R Baron, Wudbhav N Sankar","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnaf014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Determining which patients with acetabular dysplasia will benefit most from periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) can be challenging. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection (CSI) is often used for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes in various hip pathologies. This study aims to assess the relationship between self-reported preoperative CSI pain relief and postoperative pain relief after PAO. The case log of a single hip-preservation surgeon was queried from 2013 onward for patients who underwent PAO with preoperative intra-articular CSI. Patients were asked, 'overall, what percent improved are your symptoms from 0-100%?' following preoperative CSI and again at each postoperative visit. A successful postoperative pain outcome was defined as pain relief ≥75% compared to preoperative symptoms at the approximate 6 month postoperative visit. A total of 76 hips met inclusion criteria. Average self-reported relief from preoperative intra-articular CSI was 70 ± 35%. Mean postoperative pain relief was 88 ± 18%. Analysis showed a positive but weak correlation between preoperative CSI response and postoperative relief (0.278, <i>P</i> = .016). Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis found CSI pain relief ≥60% to be the optimal threshold for predicting a successful postoperative pain outcome. Positive predictive value remained high and negative predictive value (NPV) remained low over a range of CSI relief thresholds. Most patients had significant pain relief following PAO, with only 10 patients failing to achieve at least 75% improvement. As a result, the NPV associated with any CSI pain relief threshold remained low. As our patients generally experienced significant postoperative pain relief regardless of preoperative CSI response, further work is warranted to identify those less likely to benefit from surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"12 3","pages":"169-174"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnaf014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Determining which patients with acetabular dysplasia will benefit most from periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) can be challenging. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection (CSI) is often used for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes in various hip pathologies. This study aims to assess the relationship between self-reported preoperative CSI pain relief and postoperative pain relief after PAO. The case log of a single hip-preservation surgeon was queried from 2013 onward for patients who underwent PAO with preoperative intra-articular CSI. Patients were asked, 'overall, what percent improved are your symptoms from 0-100%?' following preoperative CSI and again at each postoperative visit. A successful postoperative pain outcome was defined as pain relief ≥75% compared to preoperative symptoms at the approximate 6 month postoperative visit. A total of 76 hips met inclusion criteria. Average self-reported relief from preoperative intra-articular CSI was 70 ± 35%. Mean postoperative pain relief was 88 ± 18%. Analysis showed a positive but weak correlation between preoperative CSI response and postoperative relief (0.278, P = .016). Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis found CSI pain relief ≥60% to be the optimal threshold for predicting a successful postoperative pain outcome. Positive predictive value remained high and negative predictive value (NPV) remained low over a range of CSI relief thresholds. Most patients had significant pain relief following PAO, with only 10 patients failing to achieve at least 75% improvement. As a result, the NPV associated with any CSI pain relief threshold remained low. As our patients generally experienced significant postoperative pain relief regardless of preoperative CSI response, further work is warranted to identify those less likely to benefit from surgery.

关节内皮质类固醇注射在预测髋臼周围截骨术后疼痛缓解中的价值。
确定哪些髋臼发育不良患者将从髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)中获益最多是具有挑战性的。关节内皮质类固醇注射(CSI)常用于治疗和诊断各种髋关节病变。本研究旨在评估自我报告的术前CSI疼痛缓解与PAO术后疼痛缓解之间的关系。从2013年起,我们查询了一名髋关节保护外科医生的病例记录,以了解术前关节内CSI的PAO患者。病人被问到,“总的来说,你的症状从0到100%改善了多少?”在术前和每次术后随访时再次进行。术后6个月左右随访时,与术前相比疼痛缓解≥75%,即为成功的术后疼痛结局。共有76例髋关节符合纳入标准。自我报告的术前关节内CSI平均缓解率为70±35%。术后平均疼痛缓解88±18%。分析显示术前CSI反应与术后缓解呈正相关,但呈弱相关(0.278,P = 0.016)。接受者操作者特征曲线分析发现CSI疼痛缓解≥60%是预测成功的术后疼痛结局的最佳阈值。在CSI救济阈值范围内,阳性预测值保持较高,阴性预测值(NPV)保持较低。大多数患者在PAO治疗后疼痛明显缓解,只有10例患者未能达到至少75%的改善。因此,与任何CSI疼痛缓解阈值相关的NPV仍然很低。由于我们的患者通常经历了显著的术后疼痛缓解,无论术前CSI反应如何,因此需要进一步的工作来确定那些不太可能从手术中获益的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信