Difficulty in Cannulation and Risk of Complications After ERCP According to the Type of Papilla of Vater in a Tertiary Center.

IF 4 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Renzo Pinto-Carta, Gustavo Adolfo Reyes Medina, Mariana Vásquez, Andrés Felipe Bejarano-Ramírez, María Alejandra Gómez-Gutiérrez, Fernando Sierra-Arango
{"title":"Difficulty in Cannulation and Risk of Complications After ERCP According to the Type of Papilla of Vater in a Tertiary Center.","authors":"Renzo Pinto-Carta, Gustavo Adolfo Reyes Medina, Mariana Vásquez, Andrés Felipe Bejarano-Ramírez, María Alejandra Gómez-Gutiérrez, Fernando Sierra-Arango","doi":"10.17235/reed.2025.11475/2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cannulation of the papilla of Vater is a critical step in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), with direct implications for procedural success and the risk of adverse events. Although endoscopist experience and anatomical variations are known contributors, the role of papillary morphology remains insufficiently explored in Latin America. This study aimed to assess the association between papilla type and cannulation difficulty or complications. Adults with a native major papilla undergoing ERCP at a tertiary center in Bogotá were prospectively enrolled. Papillary morphology was classified macroscopically, and difficult cannulation was defined according to ESGE criteria. Associations were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Fifty-eight patients (mean age 59.9 years, 63.8% female) were included. The most common papilla was type 1 (63.8%), followed by type 3 (27.6%). Difficult cannulation occurred in 13.8% of procedures, mostly involving type 1, type 3, and the single type 4 case. Advanced cannulation techniques were required in 34.5% of cases and were associated with longer procedural times. Prophylactic measures were used in 60.3% of patients. Overall, 6.9% developed post-ERCP pancreatitis and 3.4% cholangitis. No significant association was found between papilla type and complication rate. Our findings suggest that type 1 and type 3 papillae are more frequently associated with cannulation difficulty, although complication rates did not differ significantly by morphology. Recognizing papilla morphology may enhance preprocedural planning and training strategies in advanced endoscopy units.</p>","PeriodicalId":21342,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","volume":"117 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2025.11475/2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cannulation of the papilla of Vater is a critical step in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), with direct implications for procedural success and the risk of adverse events. Although endoscopist experience and anatomical variations are known contributors, the role of papillary morphology remains insufficiently explored in Latin America. This study aimed to assess the association between papilla type and cannulation difficulty or complications. Adults with a native major papilla undergoing ERCP at a tertiary center in Bogotá were prospectively enrolled. Papillary morphology was classified macroscopically, and difficult cannulation was defined according to ESGE criteria. Associations were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Fifty-eight patients (mean age 59.9 years, 63.8% female) were included. The most common papilla was type 1 (63.8%), followed by type 3 (27.6%). Difficult cannulation occurred in 13.8% of procedures, mostly involving type 1, type 3, and the single type 4 case. Advanced cannulation techniques were required in 34.5% of cases and were associated with longer procedural times. Prophylactic measures were used in 60.3% of patients. Overall, 6.9% developed post-ERCP pancreatitis and 3.4% cholangitis. No significant association was found between papilla type and complication rate. Our findings suggest that type 1 and type 3 papillae are more frequently associated with cannulation difficulty, although complication rates did not differ significantly by morphology. Recognizing papilla morphology may enhance preprocedural planning and training strategies in advanced endoscopy units.

三级中心水乳头类型对ERCP插管困难及并发症风险的影响。
水乳头插管是内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)的关键步骤,对手术成功和不良事件的风险有直接影响。虽然内窥镜医生的经验和解剖变异是已知的贡献者,但在拉丁美洲,乳头状形态的作用仍然没有得到充分的探讨。本研究旨在评估乳头类型与插管困难或并发症之间的关系。前瞻性纳入在波哥大三级中心接受ERCP的本地大乳头成人。从宏观上对乳头形态进行分类,根据ESGE标准定义插管困难。使用Fisher精确检验和95%置信区间的比值比分析相关性。共纳入58例患者,平均年龄59.9岁,女性占63.8%。最常见的乳头是1型(63.8%),其次是3型(27.6%)。13.8%的手术出现插管困难,主要涉及1型、3型和单一的4型病例。34.5%的病例需要先进的插管技术,且手术时间较长。60.3%的患者采取了预防措施。总体而言,6.9%发生ercp后胰腺炎,3.4%发生胆管炎。乳头类型与并发症发生率无显著相关性。我们的研究结果表明,1型和3型乳头更常与插管困难相关,尽管并发症的发生率在形态上没有显着差异。认识乳头形态可以提高术前计划和训练策略在先进的内窥镜单位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
400
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, Órgano Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD), Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva (SEED) y Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva (AEED), publica artículos originales, editoriales, revisiones, casos clínicos, cartas al director, imágenes en patología digestiva, y otros artículos especiales sobre todos los aspectos relativos a las enfermedades digestivas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信