Comparative Outcomes Following Candida Bloodstream Infection in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-08-20 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf504
Armaghan-E-Rehman Mansoor, Gayathri Krishnan, Julio C Zuniga-Moya, Benjamin Papadopoulus, Andrej Spec, Ige George
{"title":"Comparative Outcomes Following <i>Candida</i> Bloodstream Infection in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.","authors":"Armaghan-E-Rehman Mansoor, Gayathri Krishnan, Julio C Zuniga-Moya, Benjamin Papadopoulus, Andrej Spec, Ige George","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Candida bloodstream infections (BSI) carry a high risk of adverse outcomes. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used to manage end-stage heart failure; however, they carry a risk of infection. This study evaluates the impact of LVAD presence on outcomes in patients with <i>Candida</i> BSI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1233 patients with <i>Candida</i> BSI admitted to a tertiary hospital between January 2010 and December 2021 were retrospectively included, with 39 having an LVAD at the time of infection. Demographics, microbiologic data, and clinical factors associated with <i>Candida</i> BSI were recorded. Risk factors for <i>Candida</i> BSI and 30 and 90-day mortality were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with <i>Candida</i> BSI in the LVAD cohort were more likely male (77% vs 54%, <i>P</i> = .01) versus the non-LVAD group, and more frequently had central venous access before infection (67% vs 46% <i>P</i> = .01). Rates of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were higher in the LVAD group (39% vs 0.4%, <i>P</i> < .0001). <i>Candida parapsilosis</i> was the most common species in patients with LVAD (38% in LVAD vs 16%), compared to <i>Candida albicans</i> in the non-LVAD cohort (24% in LVAD vs 39%). HeartMate2 was the most common LVAD (21 patients, 54%). There was no difference in all-cause 30-day (30.7% vs 34.5%, <i>P</i> = .62) and 90-day mortality between the LVAD and non-LVAD cohorts (38.4% vs 40.7%, <i>P</i> = .77). In an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, LVAD presence also did not impact 90-day mortality (hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.77; <i>P</i> = .62]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with <i>Candida</i> BSI, presence of an LVAD did not impact 30- or 90-day mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 9","pages":"ofaf504"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf504","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Candida bloodstream infections (BSI) carry a high risk of adverse outcomes. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used to manage end-stage heart failure; however, they carry a risk of infection. This study evaluates the impact of LVAD presence on outcomes in patients with Candida BSI.

Methods: A total of 1233 patients with Candida BSI admitted to a tertiary hospital between January 2010 and December 2021 were retrospectively included, with 39 having an LVAD at the time of infection. Demographics, microbiologic data, and clinical factors associated with Candida BSI were recorded. Risk factors for Candida BSI and 30 and 90-day mortality were compared.

Results: Patients with Candida BSI in the LVAD cohort were more likely male (77% vs 54%, P = .01) versus the non-LVAD group, and more frequently had central venous access before infection (67% vs 46% P = .01). Rates of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were higher in the LVAD group (39% vs 0.4%, P < .0001). Candida parapsilosis was the most common species in patients with LVAD (38% in LVAD vs 16%), compared to Candida albicans in the non-LVAD cohort (24% in LVAD vs 39%). HeartMate2 was the most common LVAD (21 patients, 54%). There was no difference in all-cause 30-day (30.7% vs 34.5%, P = .62) and 90-day mortality between the LVAD and non-LVAD cohorts (38.4% vs 40.7%, P = .77). In an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, LVAD presence also did not impact 90-day mortality (hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.77; P = .62]).

Conclusions: In patients with Candida BSI, presence of an LVAD did not impact 30- or 90-day mortality.

左心室辅助装置患者念珠菌血流感染后的比较结果。
背景:念珠菌血流感染(BSI)具有高风险的不良后果。左心室辅助装置(lvad)越来越多地用于治疗终末期心力衰竭;然而,它们有感染的风险。本研究评估LVAD存在对念珠菌BSI患者预后的影响。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2021年12月在三级医院收治的1233例念珠菌BSI患者,其中39例在感染时患有LVAD。记录与念珠菌BSI相关的人口统计学、微生物学数据和临床因素。比较念珠菌BSI及30天和90天死亡率的危险因素。结果:与非LVAD组相比,LVAD组中患有念珠菌BSI的患者更多是男性(77%对54%,P = 0.01),并且在感染前更频繁地有中心静脉通道(67%对46%,P = 0.01)。LVAD组体外膜氧合率较高(39% vs 0.4%, P < 0.0001)。与非LVAD队列中的白色念珠菌(LVAD组24%对39%)相比,LVAD患者中最常见的菌种是假丝菌伴假丝菌病(LVAD组38%对16%)。HeartMate2是最常见的LVAD(21例,54%)。LVAD组和非LVAD组的全因30天死亡率(30.7% vs 34.5%, P = 0.62)和90天死亡率(38.4% vs 40.7%, P = 0.77)无差异。在调整后的Cox比例风险模型中,LVAD的存在也不影响90天死亡率(风险比为1.12[95%置信区间,0.70-1.77;P = 0.62])。结论:在念珠菌BSI患者中,LVAD的存在对30天或90天的死亡率没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信