Developing a Simple Scoring System on CT Findings for Predicting Treatment Failure in Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease: The BCD (Bronchiectasis and Cavity Distribution) Score.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-09-08 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf565
Makoto Hayashi, Hiroyasu Takishima, Hidekazu Cho, Fumihiro Yamaguchi, Takuya Yokoe, Satoshi Matsukura
{"title":"Developing a Simple Scoring System on CT Findings for Predicting Treatment Failure in <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> Complex Pulmonary Disease: The BCD (Bronchiectasis and Cavity Distribution) Score.","authors":"Makoto Hayashi, Hiroyasu Takishima, Hidekazu Cho, Fumihiro Yamaguchi, Takuya Yokoe, Satoshi Matsukura","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal timing for treatment initiation in <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) remains unclear due to lack of established rules for predicting treatment response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted to develop a prediction model for treatment failure at 2 Japanese university hospitals between 2012 and 2023. Participants were 135 patients with MAC-PD who received macrolides and ethambutol-containing regimens over 1 year. Treatment failure was defined as nonachievement culture conversion at 1 year. We selected model components as cavity (categorized by diameter) and bronchiectasis (categorized by modified Reiff score) on pretreatment computed tomography. Their combinations of each category were scored based on number of lobes involved and compared by average areas under the curve calculated using k-fold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three (31.9%) of the 135 patients failed in treatment. Number of lobes with cavities > 2cm or bronchiectasis with varicose or cystic changes was designated as the prediction model, with an average area under the curve of 0.798, and was named the Bronchiectasis and Cavity Distribution score. The representative metrics were sensitivity of 0.907 at the cutoff of 2 and specificity of 0.913 at the cutoff of 4 points. The patients were stratified into low-risk (0-1 points), intermediate-risk (2-3 points), and high-risk (4-6 points) groups. The treatment failure rates were 8.0%, 35.6%, and 69.2% in the respective groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With simple assessment of computed tomography findings, the Bronchiectasis and Cavity Distribution score predicted treatment failure. Although validation studies are warranted, this score may provide guidance for treatment of MAC-PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 9","pages":"ofaf565"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf565","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Optimal timing for treatment initiation in Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) remains unclear due to lack of established rules for predicting treatment response.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted to develop a prediction model for treatment failure at 2 Japanese university hospitals between 2012 and 2023. Participants were 135 patients with MAC-PD who received macrolides and ethambutol-containing regimens over 1 year. Treatment failure was defined as nonachievement culture conversion at 1 year. We selected model components as cavity (categorized by diameter) and bronchiectasis (categorized by modified Reiff score) on pretreatment computed tomography. Their combinations of each category were scored based on number of lobes involved and compared by average areas under the curve calculated using k-fold cross-validation.

Results: Forty-three (31.9%) of the 135 patients failed in treatment. Number of lobes with cavities > 2cm or bronchiectasis with varicose or cystic changes was designated as the prediction model, with an average area under the curve of 0.798, and was named the Bronchiectasis and Cavity Distribution score. The representative metrics were sensitivity of 0.907 at the cutoff of 2 and specificity of 0.913 at the cutoff of 4 points. The patients were stratified into low-risk (0-1 points), intermediate-risk (2-3 points), and high-risk (4-6 points) groups. The treatment failure rates were 8.0%, 35.6%, and 69.2% in the respective groups.

Conclusions: With simple assessment of computed tomography findings, the Bronchiectasis and Cavity Distribution score predicted treatment failure. Although validation studies are warranted, this score may provide guidance for treatment of MAC-PD.

开发一种预测鸟分枝杆菌复杂肺部疾病治疗失败的简单CT评分系统:BCD(支气管扩张和腔分布)评分
背景:由于缺乏预测治疗反应的既定规则,鸟分枝杆菌复杂肺部疾病(MAC-PD)开始治疗的最佳时机仍不清楚。方法:采用回顾性观察研究,建立2012 - 2023年日本2所大学附属医院治疗失败的预测模型。参与者是135名接受大环内酯类药物和乙胺丁醇治疗超过1年的MAC-PD患者。治疗失败定义为1年无成就文化转换。我们选择预处理计算机断层扫描上的腔(按直径分类)和支气管扩张(按改良的Reiff评分分类)作为模型成分。每个类别的组合根据所涉及的叶数进行评分,并通过使用k-fold交叉验证计算的曲线下的平均面积进行比较。结果:135例患者中43例(31.9%)治疗失败。以支气管扩张伴静脉曲张或囊性改变的肺叶数> 2cm或支气管扩张伴静脉曲张或囊性改变的肺叶数为预测模型,曲线下平均面积为0.798,命名为支气管扩张伴腔分布评分。代表性指标为2点时敏感性为0.907,4点时特异性为0.913。将患者分为低危组(0-1分)、中危组(2-3分)和高危组(4-6分)。治疗失败率分别为8.0%、35.6%和69.2%。结论:通过简单的计算机断层扫描结果评估,支气管扩张和腔分布评分预测治疗失败。虽然验证研究是必要的,但该评分可以为MAC-PD的治疗提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信