Hybrid percutaneous-endoscopic necrosectomy for large walled-off pancreatic necrosis: an observational feasibility study.

IF 4 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Elena Tenorio González, Nada El-Domiaty, Emilia Ragot, Tom Boeken, Hadrien Alric, Alessandro Di Gaeta, Aurelien Saltel, Guillaume Perrod, Laetitia Paulmier-Clee, Christophe Cellier, Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles
{"title":"Hybrid percutaneous-endoscopic necrosectomy for large walled-off pancreatic necrosis: an observational feasibility study.","authors":"Elena Tenorio González, Nada El-Domiaty, Emilia Ragot, Tom Boeken, Hadrien Alric, Alessandro Di Gaeta, Aurelien Saltel, Guillaume Perrod, Laetitia Paulmier-Clee, Christophe Cellier, Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles","doi":"10.17235/reed.2025.11510/2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Although direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) by transgastric approach is accurate and enough in most patients presenting with infected walled-off necrosis (WON), some of them with very large and/or distal collections may need further therapies such as percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy. Percutaneous hybrid necrosectomy (PHN) represents a new approach in these cases, combining the use of surgical clamps through the percutaneous fistula and a transgastric or percutaneous endoscopic guidance. The aim was to analyze the impact of this innovative multidisciplinary technique on selected patients with WON.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an observational single-center study. All consecutive patients presenting with large WON who underwent PHN in 2019-2023 were included. A classification in early (<3 previous DEN) or late PHN (≥3) was defined. The primary outcome was the clinical success, defined as symptom relief with WON complete resolution. The secondary aims were the time to WON resolution and the adverse event (AE) rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 51 patients presenting with WON, 15 (mean age: 59±12.7, 80% male) underwent DEN combined with PHN and were included. The median number DEN sessions were two. Overall, most patients required only one single PHN procedure (n=9, 60%) during an interval time of 8 days (range: 2-14). Clinical success was obtained in 14 cases (93.3%). The time to WON resolution was lower in patients with an early PHN strategy (13 vs. 30 days, p=0.024). The overall per-procedure AE rate was 10.5% during a median follow-up of 6.5 months (range: 3-49), with no procedure-related mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PHN under transgastric or percutaneous guidance represents a new minimally invasive and collaborative approach for selected patients with large WON. A low number of procedures is needed to achieve clinical success in a shorter time.</p>","PeriodicalId":21342,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2025.11510/2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Although direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) by transgastric approach is accurate and enough in most patients presenting with infected walled-off necrosis (WON), some of them with very large and/or distal collections may need further therapies such as percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy. Percutaneous hybrid necrosectomy (PHN) represents a new approach in these cases, combining the use of surgical clamps through the percutaneous fistula and a transgastric or percutaneous endoscopic guidance. The aim was to analyze the impact of this innovative multidisciplinary technique on selected patients with WON.

Methods: This is an observational single-center study. All consecutive patients presenting with large WON who underwent PHN in 2019-2023 were included. A classification in early (<3 previous DEN) or late PHN (≥3) was defined. The primary outcome was the clinical success, defined as symptom relief with WON complete resolution. The secondary aims were the time to WON resolution and the adverse event (AE) rate.

Results: Of 51 patients presenting with WON, 15 (mean age: 59±12.7, 80% male) underwent DEN combined with PHN and were included. The median number DEN sessions were two. Overall, most patients required only one single PHN procedure (n=9, 60%) during an interval time of 8 days (range: 2-14). Clinical success was obtained in 14 cases (93.3%). The time to WON resolution was lower in patients with an early PHN strategy (13 vs. 30 days, p=0.024). The overall per-procedure AE rate was 10.5% during a median follow-up of 6.5 months (range: 3-49), with no procedure-related mortality.

Conclusions: PHN under transgastric or percutaneous guidance represents a new minimally invasive and collaborative approach for selected patients with large WON. A low number of procedures is needed to achieve clinical success in a shorter time.

经皮-内窥镜混合坏死切除术治疗大面积壁闭塞性胰腺坏死:一项观察性可行性研究。
背景和目的:虽然经胃入路的直接内镜下坏死切除术(DEN)对大多数感染的壁状坏死(WON)患者是准确和足够的,但其中一些非常大和/或远端集合可能需要进一步的治疗,如经皮内镜下坏死切除术。经皮混合坏死切开术(PHN)在这些病例中代表了一种新的方法,结合使用经皮瘘和经胃或经皮内镜指导的手术夹。目的是分析这种创新的多学科技术对选定的WON患者的影响。方法:这是一项观察性单中心研究。所有在2019-2023年连续接受PHN的大WON患者均被纳入研究。结果:51例出现WON的患者中,15例(平均年龄:59±12.7,80%为男性)行DEN合并PHN手术。DEN疗程的中位数为2次。总体而言,大多数患者在8天(范围:2-14天)的间隔时间内只需要一次PHN手术(n= 9.60%)。临床成功率14例(93.3%)。早期PHN策略患者的WON消退时间较短(13天vs. 30天,p=0.024)。在中位随访6.5个月(范围:3-49)期间,每次手术的总体AE发生率为10.5%,无手术相关死亡。结论:经胃或经皮引导下的PHN为选定的大WON患者提供了一种新的微创和协作方法。在较短的时间内获得临床成功所需的手术数量较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
400
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, Órgano Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD), Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva (SEED) y Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva (AEED), publica artículos originales, editoriales, revisiones, casos clínicos, cartas al director, imágenes en patología digestiva, y otros artículos especiales sobre todos los aspectos relativos a las enfermedades digestivas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信