Are psychological factors associated with patient-reported pain and function in individuals with hip joint-related pain? A systematic review.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2025-09-29 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.70015
Kate N Jochimsen, James D Doorley, Jennifer Monnin, Joshua E Cohen, Hunter Robinson, William K Vasileff, Cale A Jacobs, Stephanie Di Stasi, Ana-Maria Vranceanu
{"title":"Are psychological factors associated with patient-reported pain and function in individuals with hip joint-related pain? A systematic review.","authors":"Kate N Jochimsen, James D Doorley, Jennifer Monnin, Joshua E Cohen, Hunter Robinson, William K Vasileff, Cale A Jacobs, Stephanie Di Stasi, Ana-Maria Vranceanu","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine associations between (1) baseline psychological factors and pain and function, (2) baseline psychological factors and postintervention (nonoperative or surgery) pain and function, and (3) how psychological factors change following intervention in patients with hip joint-related pain.</p><p><strong>Literature survey: </strong>In July 2021 and June 2023, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL with Full Text, and SPORTDiscus were searched. Search strategies are available in our institutional repository. Quantitative research studies (observational, interventional, case-series/case-control) on hip joint--related pain were included if one psychological and one pain or functional patient-reported outcome measure were reported. Qualitative methods, non-hip joint-related pain pathologies, nonoriginal/non-peer-reviewed, review papers, dissertation/thesis, conference proceedings, book chapters, and protocols were excluded.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Two authors screened titles/abstracts and read all articles to confirm eligibility. Results were reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment Tools. Data (demographics, diagnosis, psychological factors, pain/function, intervention) were extracted. A quantitative analysis was not performed due to lack of study homogeneity and outcome data. Descriptive data and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation ratings were reported.</p><p><strong>Synthesis: </strong>A total of 6040 abstracts/titles and 93 full texts were screened. Sixty articles published between 2007 and 2023 were included. Most were observational, with acceptable quality and moderate-to-low-level bias. Nineteen studies examined baseline associations between psychological factors and pain and function. Of those, 17 studies (89.5%) identified at least one association. Twenty-six studies examined the association between baseline psychological factors and postintervention pain and function. Twenty of these studies (76.9%) identified an association. It is unclear whether or how psychological factors change following intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is consistent, low- to moderate-grade evidence supporting an association between psychological factors and pain and function in patients with hip joint-related pain at baseline and following intervention. There is inconsistent, very low-grade evidence on whether psychological factors improve following intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.70015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine associations between (1) baseline psychological factors and pain and function, (2) baseline psychological factors and postintervention (nonoperative or surgery) pain and function, and (3) how psychological factors change following intervention in patients with hip joint-related pain.

Literature survey: In July 2021 and June 2023, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL with Full Text, and SPORTDiscus were searched. Search strategies are available in our institutional repository. Quantitative research studies (observational, interventional, case-series/case-control) on hip joint--related pain were included if one psychological and one pain or functional patient-reported outcome measure were reported. Qualitative methods, non-hip joint-related pain pathologies, nonoriginal/non-peer-reviewed, review papers, dissertation/thesis, conference proceedings, book chapters, and protocols were excluded.

Methodology: Two authors screened titles/abstracts and read all articles to confirm eligibility. Results were reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment Tools. Data (demographics, diagnosis, psychological factors, pain/function, intervention) were extracted. A quantitative analysis was not performed due to lack of study homogeneity and outcome data. Descriptive data and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation ratings were reported.

Synthesis: A total of 6040 abstracts/titles and 93 full texts were screened. Sixty articles published between 2007 and 2023 were included. Most were observational, with acceptable quality and moderate-to-low-level bias. Nineteen studies examined baseline associations between psychological factors and pain and function. Of those, 17 studies (89.5%) identified at least one association. Twenty-six studies examined the association between baseline psychological factors and postintervention pain and function. Twenty of these studies (76.9%) identified an association. It is unclear whether or how psychological factors change following intervention.

Conclusions: There is consistent, low- to moderate-grade evidence supporting an association between psychological factors and pain and function in patients with hip joint-related pain at baseline and following intervention. There is inconsistent, very low-grade evidence on whether psychological factors improve following intervention.

在髋关节相关疼痛患者中,心理因素是否与患者报告的疼痛和功能有关?系统回顾。
目的:探讨(1)基线心理因素与疼痛和功能的关系;(2)基线心理因素与干预后(非手术或手术)疼痛和功能的关系;(3)髋关节相关性疼痛患者干预后心理因素的变化。文献调查:于2021年7月和2023年6月检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science Core Collection、CINAHL with Full Text和SPORTDiscus。搜索策略在我们的机构存储库中可用。如果报告了一项心理和一项疼痛或功能性患者报告的结果测量,则纳入了髋关节相关疼痛的定量研究(观察性、介入性、病例系列/病例对照)。定性方法、非髋关节相关疼痛病理、非原创/非同行评议、综述论文、学位论文/论文、会议记录、书籍章节和协议被排除在外。方法:两位作者筛选标题/摘要并阅读所有文章以确认合格。使用系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目报告结果。使用美国国立卫生研究院质量评估工具评估偏倚风险。提取数据(人口统计学、诊断、心理因素、疼痛/功能、干预)。由于缺乏研究同质性和结果数据,未进行定量分析。报告了描述性数据和建议评估、发展和评价等级的分级。综合:共筛选6040篇摘要/题目和93篇全文。收录了2007年至2023年间发表的60篇文章。大多数是观察性的,具有可接受的质量和中低偏倚。19项研究调查了心理因素与疼痛和功能之间的基本联系。其中,17项研究(89.5%)确定了至少一种关联。26项研究调查了基线心理因素与干预后疼痛和功能之间的关系。其中20项研究(76.9%)确定了两者之间的关联。目前尚不清楚心理因素是否或如何在干预后发生变化。结论:有一致的、低到中等等级的证据支持心理因素与髋关节相关疼痛患者的疼痛和功能之间的关联,在基线和干预后。关于心理因素是否在干预后得到改善,有不一致的、非常低级的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信