Practitioner training and user experience of Seeking Safety for people with complex post-traumatic stress disorder and substance use disorder.

IF 2.4 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PeerJ Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.20010
Luise V Marino, Osahon Ogbeiwi, Melanie Mott, Matthew Jordan, Tracey Smith, Wajid Khan, Martin Webber
{"title":"Practitioner training and user experience of <i>Seeking Safety</i> for people with complex post-traumatic stress disorder and substance use disorder.","authors":"Luise V Marino, Osahon Ogbeiwi, Melanie Mott, Matthew Jordan, Tracey Smith, Wajid Khan, Martin Webber","doi":"10.7717/peerj.20010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) develops because of a profoundly traumatic experience such as combat situations, interpersonal violence, accidents, and natural disasters. Symptom manifestation may include recurring intrusive thoughts and memories, low mood, hypervigilance, disrupted sleep patterns, emotional dysregulation, and reduced attention span. Individuals affected by complex PTSD may withdraw from society or engage in harmful, risky and dangerous behaviours or develop substance use disorder (SUD). The purpose of this scoping review is to consider available evidence around the use of <i>Seeking Safety</i> as a treatment modality in individuals with complex PTSD and SUD. In particular it aims to identify the available evidence relating to <i>Seeking Safety</i> with regards to (i) gaps in knowledge around implementation; (ii) which healthcare professionals (HCPs) deliver <i>Seeking Safety</i>; (iii) knowledge and training required to deliver it; and (iv) the experience of individuals completing <i>Seeking Safety</i> treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review methodology was used to identify qualitative, quantitative, and grey literature of <i>Seeking Safety</i> as a treatment modality in individuals with PTSD and SUD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 451 studies were identified. Following deduplications, 431 records were screened for inclusion, the full-text of 24 articles were reviewed for eligibility and 18 were included in the review. Extracted data was synthesized and six overarching themes were identified: (i) <i>Seeking Safety</i> as a treatment; (ii) meeting the needs of a diverse patient population group; (iii) factors impacting success; (iv) empowerment of self and agency over life; (v) measuring treatment success; and (vi) knowledge gaps of <i>Seeking Safety</i> treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review considers the gaps in knowledge around <i>Seeking Safety</i>, specifically relating to which HCPs are best suited to delivering it in clinical practice; the knowledge and training required to deliver it; and the experience of individuals undertaking <i>Seeking Safety</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":19799,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ","volume":"13 ","pages":"e20010"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) develops because of a profoundly traumatic experience such as combat situations, interpersonal violence, accidents, and natural disasters. Symptom manifestation may include recurring intrusive thoughts and memories, low mood, hypervigilance, disrupted sleep patterns, emotional dysregulation, and reduced attention span. Individuals affected by complex PTSD may withdraw from society or engage in harmful, risky and dangerous behaviours or develop substance use disorder (SUD). The purpose of this scoping review is to consider available evidence around the use of Seeking Safety as a treatment modality in individuals with complex PTSD and SUD. In particular it aims to identify the available evidence relating to Seeking Safety with regards to (i) gaps in knowledge around implementation; (ii) which healthcare professionals (HCPs) deliver Seeking Safety; (iii) knowledge and training required to deliver it; and (iv) the experience of individuals completing Seeking Safety treatment.

Methods: A scoping review methodology was used to identify qualitative, quantitative, and grey literature of Seeking Safety as a treatment modality in individuals with PTSD and SUD.

Results: A total of 451 studies were identified. Following deduplications, 431 records were screened for inclusion, the full-text of 24 articles were reviewed for eligibility and 18 were included in the review. Extracted data was synthesized and six overarching themes were identified: (i) Seeking Safety as a treatment; (ii) meeting the needs of a diverse patient population group; (iii) factors impacting success; (iv) empowerment of self and agency over life; (v) measuring treatment success; and (vi) knowledge gaps of Seeking Safety treatment.

Conclusion: This scoping review considers the gaps in knowledge around Seeking Safety, specifically relating to which HCPs are best suited to delivering it in clinical practice; the knowledge and training required to deliver it; and the experience of individuals undertaking Seeking Safety.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

复杂创伤后应激障碍和物质使用障碍患者寻求安全的从业人员培训和用户体验。
背景:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)是由于深刻的创伤经历,如战斗情景、人际暴力、事故和自然灾害而发展起来的。症状表现可能包括反复出现的侵入性思想和记忆、情绪低落、高度警惕、睡眠模式中断、情绪失调和注意力持续时间缩短。受复杂创伤后应激障碍影响的个体可能会退出社会,或从事有害、危险和危险的行为,或发展为物质使用障碍(SUD)。本综述的目的是考虑将寻求安全作为复杂PTSD和SUD患者治疗方式的现有证据。特别是,它的目的是在以下方面确定与寻求安全有关的现有证据:(i)在实施方面的知识差距;(ii)哪些医护专业人员提供“寻求安全”服务;(iii)交付所需的知识和培训;(iv)个人完成寻求安全治疗的经验。方法:采用范围回顾方法,确定寻求安全作为PTSD和SUD个体治疗方式的定性、定量和灰色文献。结果:共确定了451项研究。重复数据删除后,筛选了431份记录,对24篇文章的全文进行了合格审查,其中18篇被纳入审查。对提取的数据进行了综合,确定了六个总体主题:(i)寻求安全作为一种治疗方法;(ii)满足不同患者群体的需要;(iii)影响成功的因素;(iv)赋予自我和对生活的能动性权力;(v)衡量治疗成功;(vi)寻求安全治疗方面的知识差距。结论:这一范围审查考虑了在寻求安全方面的知识差距,特别是关于哪些HCPs最适合在临床实践中提供它;提供所需的知识和培训;以及个人寻求安全的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PeerJ
PeerJ MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1665
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信