Nikit Venishetty, Akash Chauhan, Ishant Goel, Jonathan Balderrama, Maral Demirjian, Lorna Kwan, Ilina D Pluym, Renea Sturm
{"title":"Evaluating Male Fetal External Genital Morphology: A Systematic Review of Sonographic Techniques and Normative Values.","authors":"Nikit Venishetty, Akash Chauhan, Ishant Goel, Jonathan Balderrama, Maral Demirjian, Lorna Kwan, Ilina D Pluym, Renea Sturm","doi":"10.1002/jum.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although commonly evaluated, fetal ultrasound assessments of penile length, width, and anogenital distance (AGD) lack standardized measurement techniques. This systematic review aimed to evaluate variability in measurement methods and generate normative growth curves for externally virilized genital development. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting sonographic measurements of fetal penile length, width, or AGD by gestational age. Exclusion criteria included abnormal genitourinary development, intrauterine growth restriction, non-ultrasound imaging modalities, and non-English publications. Manuscripts were analyzed by a minimum of three reviewers. Data were standardized to mean dimensions and 95% confidence intervals by gestational week. Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Six measured penile length (scrotum to tip), four measured width (widest penile region), and three evaluated AGD (scrotum to anus). Resulting regression equations were y = 0.7862x - 8.4627 (length), y = 0.4209x - 3.1445 (width), and y = 1.0129x - 11.239 (AGD). Quality assessments revealed only 51.97 ± 21.5% of study parameters had a low risk of bias. The resultant growth curves provide a reference for normative development. Standardized assessment protocols and studies of anomalous development are needed to improve measurement consistency and assess the predictive value of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although commonly evaluated, fetal ultrasound assessments of penile length, width, and anogenital distance (AGD) lack standardized measurement techniques. This systematic review aimed to evaluate variability in measurement methods and generate normative growth curves for externally virilized genital development. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting sonographic measurements of fetal penile length, width, or AGD by gestational age. Exclusion criteria included abnormal genitourinary development, intrauterine growth restriction, non-ultrasound imaging modalities, and non-English publications. Manuscripts were analyzed by a minimum of three reviewers. Data were standardized to mean dimensions and 95% confidence intervals by gestational week. Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Six measured penile length (scrotum to tip), four measured width (widest penile region), and three evaluated AGD (scrotum to anus). Resulting regression equations were y = 0.7862x - 8.4627 (length), y = 0.4209x - 3.1445 (width), and y = 1.0129x - 11.239 (AGD). Quality assessments revealed only 51.97 ± 21.5% of study parameters had a low risk of bias. The resultant growth curves provide a reference for normative development. Standardized assessment protocols and studies of anomalous development are needed to improve measurement consistency and assess the predictive value of these findings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community.
Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to:
-Basic Science-
Breast Ultrasound-
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-
Dermatology-
Echocardiography-
Elastography-
Emergency Medicine-
Fetal Echocardiography-
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound-
General and Abdominal Ultrasound-
Genitourinary Ultrasound-
Gynecologic Ultrasound-
Head and Neck Ultrasound-
High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging-
Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound-
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound-
Neurosonology-
Obstetric Ultrasound-
Ophthalmologic Ultrasound-
Pediatric Ultrasound-
Point-of-Care Ultrasound-
Public Policy-
Superficial Structures-
Therapeutic Ultrasound-
Ultrasound Education-
Ultrasound in Global Health-
Urologic Ultrasound-
Vascular Ultrasound