Ian Pope, Zuzanna Halicka, Lucy Clark, Susan Stirling, Allan Clark, Caitlin Notley
{"title":"Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department (COSTED): Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ian Pope, Zuzanna Halicka, Lucy Clark, Susan Stirling, Allan Clark, Caitlin Notley","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency Departments (EDs) offer a valuable opportunity to deliver smoking cessation interventions. Long-term abstinence confers the maximum health benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults attending UK EDs who currently smoked were randomized to intervention (brief advice, e-cigarette and referral to local stop smoking services) or control (contact details for local stop smoking services). Participants were followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months as part of the main trial. Participants who consented to long term follow-up were also contacted at approximately 18 months post randomization. For an \"all participants\" analysis those who did not consent to long-term follow-up had their smoking status set at the value of the 6 month outcome. Those who did not respond were assumed to be smoking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Long-term follow-up occurred between 14 and 22 months, mean = 18 months. Long term follow-up for those who consented to this was 35% in the intervention group (n = 145) and 34% in the control group (n = 143). For those who consented to long term follow-up self-reported 7-day abstinence at 18 months was 12.8% in the intervention group (n = 53) and 8.33% in the control group (n = 35) (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.04-2.32, p=.031). For all participants self-reported 7-day abstinence at long term follow-up was 13.8% in the intervention group (n = 67) and 8.6% in the control group (n = 42) (RR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.12-2.31, p=.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adults who smoke attending the ED who received a smoking cessation intervention were significantly more likely to report abstinence 18 months after randomization.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Emergency Departments should be considered as a location for smoking cessation interventions in order to increase long term abstinence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Emergency Departments (EDs) offer a valuable opportunity to deliver smoking cessation interventions. Long-term abstinence confers the maximum health benefits.
Methods: Adults attending UK EDs who currently smoked were randomized to intervention (brief advice, e-cigarette and referral to local stop smoking services) or control (contact details for local stop smoking services). Participants were followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months as part of the main trial. Participants who consented to long term follow-up were also contacted at approximately 18 months post randomization. For an "all participants" analysis those who did not consent to long-term follow-up had their smoking status set at the value of the 6 month outcome. Those who did not respond were assumed to be smoking.
Results: Long-term follow-up occurred between 14 and 22 months, mean = 18 months. Long term follow-up for those who consented to this was 35% in the intervention group (n = 145) and 34% in the control group (n = 143). For those who consented to long term follow-up self-reported 7-day abstinence at 18 months was 12.8% in the intervention group (n = 53) and 8.33% in the control group (n = 35) (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.04-2.32, p=.031). For all participants self-reported 7-day abstinence at long term follow-up was 13.8% in the intervention group (n = 67) and 8.6% in the control group (n = 42) (RR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.12-2.31, p=.010).
Conclusions: Adults who smoke attending the ED who received a smoking cessation intervention were significantly more likely to report abstinence 18 months after randomization.
Implications: Emergency Departments should be considered as a location for smoking cessation interventions in order to increase long term abstinence.
期刊介绍:
Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco.
It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas.
Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries.
The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.