The Take 5 Campaign: Effects of an Intervention to Promote Five-Day Durations of Antibiotic Therapy for Common Infections in Urgent Care.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-09-08 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf564
Timothy C Jenkins, Axel A Vazquez Deida, Lindsey E Fish, Michael J Breyer, Amy Quinones, Melody Zwakenberg, Cory K Hussain, Allison L Sabel, Katherine C Shihadeh
{"title":"The Take 5 Campaign: Effects of an Intervention to Promote Five-Day Durations of Antibiotic Therapy for Common Infections in Urgent Care.","authors":"Timothy C Jenkins, Axel A Vazquez Deida, Lindsey E Fish, Michael J Breyer, Amy Quinones, Melody Zwakenberg, Cory K Hussain, Allison L Sabel, Katherine C Shihadeh","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We implemented an intervention to promote 5-day durations of antibiotic therapy for common infections in urgent care. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of this intervention on prescribed durations and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a quasi-experimental study involving 2 urgent care centers in an integrated health care system. The Take 5 campaign was a multifaceted intervention to promote adherence to institutional guidance for 5-day durations of therapy for skin infections, urinary tract infections, sinusitis, otitis media, pneumonia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Patients ≥18 years of age with an urgent care visit between January 2017 and December 2023 for 1 of the target infections were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of antibiotic prescriptions for ≤5 days before and after the intervention, as assessed by interrupted time-series analysis (ITS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before the intervention, there was a significant increasing trend in the proportion of prescriptions for ≤5 days. The intervention was associated with an immediate 10.7% increase in the proportion of prescriptions for ≤5 days (<i>P</i> < .001), with a subsequent sustained upward trend of 0.18% per month (<i>P</i> < .001). The aggregate proportion of prescriptions for ≤5 days increased from 57.5% before the intervention to 82.9% after implementation (<i>P</i> < .001). Rates of new antibiotic prescriptions and hospitalizations within 14 days were similar between the periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Take 5 campaign was associated with increased adoption of 5-day antibiotic durations. Shortening durations of therapy appears to be an effective strategy to reduce unnecessary antibiotic exposure in the urgent care setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 9","pages":"ofaf564"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We implemented an intervention to promote 5-day durations of antibiotic therapy for common infections in urgent care. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of this intervention on prescribed durations and clinical outcomes.

Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study involving 2 urgent care centers in an integrated health care system. The Take 5 campaign was a multifaceted intervention to promote adherence to institutional guidance for 5-day durations of therapy for skin infections, urinary tract infections, sinusitis, otitis media, pneumonia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Patients ≥18 years of age with an urgent care visit between January 2017 and December 2023 for 1 of the target infections were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of antibiotic prescriptions for ≤5 days before and after the intervention, as assessed by interrupted time-series analysis (ITS).

Results: Before the intervention, there was a significant increasing trend in the proportion of prescriptions for ≤5 days. The intervention was associated with an immediate 10.7% increase in the proportion of prescriptions for ≤5 days (P < .001), with a subsequent sustained upward trend of 0.18% per month (P < .001). The aggregate proportion of prescriptions for ≤5 days increased from 57.5% before the intervention to 82.9% after implementation (P < .001). Rates of new antibiotic prescriptions and hospitalizations within 14 days were similar between the periods.

Conclusions: The Take 5 campaign was associated with increased adoption of 5-day antibiotic durations. Shortening durations of therapy appears to be an effective strategy to reduce unnecessary antibiotic exposure in the urgent care setting.

Take 5运动:促进紧急护理中常见感染的5天抗生素治疗的干预效果。
背景:我们实施了一项干预措施,以促进紧急护理中常见感染的5天抗生素治疗。本研究的目的是评估这种干预对规定持续时间和临床结果的影响。方法:本研究是一项准实验研究,涉及一个综合卫生保健系统中的2个急诊中心。Take 5活动是一项多方面的干预,旨在促进对皮肤感染、尿路感染、鼻窦炎、中耳炎、肺炎和慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重的5天治疗持续时间的机构指导的依从性。纳入了2017年1月至2023年12月期间因1个目标感染而进行紧急护理就诊的≥18岁患者。主要终点是通过中断时间序列分析(ITS)评估干预前后≤5天的抗生素处方比例。结果:干预前≤5天处方占比有明显上升趋势。干预与≤5天的处方比例立即增加10.7% (P < 0.001)相关,随后每月持续上升0.18% (P < 0.001)。≤5天处方总占比由干预前的57.5%上升至干预后的82.9% (P < 0.001)。14天内的新抗生素处方和住院率在两个时期之间相似。结论:Take 5运动与5天抗生素持续时间的增加有关。缩短治疗时间似乎是一种有效的策略,以减少不必要的抗生素暴露在紧急护理设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信