Development and Validation of a Novel Classification Framework for Voluntary Food Safety Adoption Among Small-Scale Produce Growers: A Pilot Study.

IF 2.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Jesica Temple, Jessica M Blythe, Tim P Boltz, Arron J Giorgi, Christopher M Ashwell, Cangliang Shen
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Novel Classification Framework for Voluntary Food Safety Adoption Among Small-Scale Produce Growers: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Jesica Temple, Jessica M Blythe, Tim P Boltz, Arron J Giorgi, Christopher M Ashwell, Cangliang Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study utilizes a novel classification framework to address voluntary food safety practices among small-scale produce growers who sell primarily at West Virginia farmers' markets. Limited data exist on how these exempt growers voluntarily adopt post-harvest food safety practices. This pilot study assessed post-harvest food safety behaviors and introduced a behavioral classification framework-Willing, Ready, and Able (WRA)-to stratify engagement among FSMA-exempt small-scale produce growers. A cross-sectional survey was administered in 2025 to 40 growers at the West Virginia Small Farms Conference. FSMA exemption was confirmed by self-report or eligibility criteria; five FSMA-covered respondents were excluded, yielding a final sample of 35. Growers were categorized as FSMA-Willing (no training, confident in current practices), FSMA-Ready (training plus adoption of one to three Good Agricultural Practices(GAPs)aligned practices), or FSMA-Able (training plus adoption of four or more GAPs-aligned practices). Among FSMA-exempt respondents (n = 35), 62.8% reported training, 53.1% sanitized surfaces, and 52.5% used refrigeration. WRA classification revealed that 34.3% were Willing, 34.3% Ready, and 28.5% Able. The WRA framework introduces a novel behavioral classification system to differentiate FSMA-exempt growers by readiness, training history, and current safety practices. These findings suggest many exempt growers voluntarily implement risk-reducing behaviors, and WRA can guide targeted outreach to improve food safety in decentralized systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":" ","pages":"100630"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100630","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study utilizes a novel classification framework to address voluntary food safety practices among small-scale produce growers who sell primarily at West Virginia farmers' markets. Limited data exist on how these exempt growers voluntarily adopt post-harvest food safety practices. This pilot study assessed post-harvest food safety behaviors and introduced a behavioral classification framework-Willing, Ready, and Able (WRA)-to stratify engagement among FSMA-exempt small-scale produce growers. A cross-sectional survey was administered in 2025 to 40 growers at the West Virginia Small Farms Conference. FSMA exemption was confirmed by self-report or eligibility criteria; five FSMA-covered respondents were excluded, yielding a final sample of 35. Growers were categorized as FSMA-Willing (no training, confident in current practices), FSMA-Ready (training plus adoption of one to three Good Agricultural Practices(GAPs)aligned practices), or FSMA-Able (training plus adoption of four or more GAPs-aligned practices). Among FSMA-exempt respondents (n = 35), 62.8% reported training, 53.1% sanitized surfaces, and 52.5% used refrigeration. WRA classification revealed that 34.3% were Willing, 34.3% Ready, and 28.5% Able. The WRA framework introduces a novel behavioral classification system to differentiate FSMA-exempt growers by readiness, training history, and current safety practices. These findings suggest many exempt growers voluntarily implement risk-reducing behaviors, and WRA can guide targeted outreach to improve food safety in decentralized systems.

小规模生产者自愿采用食品安全新分类框架的开发和验证:一项试点研究。
本研究利用一种新的分类框架来解决主要在西弗吉尼亚州农贸市场销售的小规模农产品种植者的自愿食品安全实践问题。关于这些豁免种植者如何自愿采用收获后食品安全措施的数据有限。这项试点研究评估了收获后的食品安全行为,并引入了一个行为分类框架——意愿、准备和能力(WRA)——来对不受fsma约束的小规模农产品种植者的参与情况进行分层。2025年,在西弗吉尼亚州小型农场会议上,对40名种植者进行了横断面调查。通过自我报告或资格标准确认FSMA豁免;5名fsma覆盖的受访者被排除在外,最终样本为35人。种植者被分为fsma意愿(未接受培训,对现行做法有信心)、fsma准备(接受培训并采用1 - 3种符合良好农业规范(gap)的做法)或fsma能够(接受培训并采用4种或更多符合良好农业规范的做法)。在fsma豁免的受访者中(n = 35), 62.8%的人报告了培训,53.1%的人消毒过表面,52.5%的人使用过冰箱。WRA分类显示34.3%为Willing, 34.3%为Ready, 28.5%为Able。WRA框架引入了一种新的行为分类系统,通过准备情况、培训历史和当前的安全实践来区分fsma豁免种植者。这些发现表明,许多豁免种植者自愿实施降低风险的行为,WRA可以指导有针对性的推广,以改善分散系统中的食品安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信