{"title":"Optimizing Salmonella recovery from commercial poultry environmental samples with selective pre-enrichment.","authors":"Amy T Siceloff, Nikki W Shariat","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current, culture-based methods for detecting Salmonella are time and resource intensive, as it can take between three to five days with pre-enrichment and selective enrichment steps. Previous work by our group has shortened this process by combining novobiocin and selective ingredients from Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) (malachite green; 0.1 g/L) and tetrathionate (TT) (bile salts; 1 g/L) to BPW in parallel, creating an all-encompassing selective pre-enrichment step. In this study, we sought to validate the use of selective pre-enrichment on commercial poultry live production samples, as the increased presence of background bacteria may limit Salmonella recovery. Two pairs of boot sock samples were collected from 35 houses, representing 17 different commercial broiler or breeder farms (n = 70 samples). The samples were cultured under selective pre-enrichment conditions in parallel with standard non-selective pre-enrichment (BPW) followed by selective enrichment (RV, TT). Additionally, molecular enumeration was performed to quantify the amount of Salmonella present in each sample. Overall, Salmonella was found in 74% (52/70) of samples collected, and selective pre-enrichment and selective enrichment conditions each recovered Salmonella in 14/17 farms. The average quantity per sample was greater in those recovered with selective pre-enrichment (5.2 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/sample) than those that were not (3.0 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/sample; p = 0.01, Welch two sample t-test). CRISPR-SeroSeq was used to determine the relative frequency of Salmonella serovars in each sample and culture condition. The proportion of multiserovar populations observed in the selective pre-enrichment conditions (53%, 29/55) was not significantly different from those in selective enrichment conditions (56%, 39/70; p = 0.1, McNemar's chi-squared test). These findings suggest that increasing the selectivity of the Salmonella pre-enrichment step could eliminate the need for a subsequent selective enrichment, thus reducing the time to Salmonella isolation by 24 hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":" ","pages":"100627"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The current, culture-based methods for detecting Salmonella are time and resource intensive, as it can take between three to five days with pre-enrichment and selective enrichment steps. Previous work by our group has shortened this process by combining novobiocin and selective ingredients from Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) (malachite green; 0.1 g/L) and tetrathionate (TT) (bile salts; 1 g/L) to BPW in parallel, creating an all-encompassing selective pre-enrichment step. In this study, we sought to validate the use of selective pre-enrichment on commercial poultry live production samples, as the increased presence of background bacteria may limit Salmonella recovery. Two pairs of boot sock samples were collected from 35 houses, representing 17 different commercial broiler or breeder farms (n = 70 samples). The samples were cultured under selective pre-enrichment conditions in parallel with standard non-selective pre-enrichment (BPW) followed by selective enrichment (RV, TT). Additionally, molecular enumeration was performed to quantify the amount of Salmonella present in each sample. Overall, Salmonella was found in 74% (52/70) of samples collected, and selective pre-enrichment and selective enrichment conditions each recovered Salmonella in 14/17 farms. The average quantity per sample was greater in those recovered with selective pre-enrichment (5.2 log10 CFU/sample) than those that were not (3.0 log10 CFU/sample; p = 0.01, Welch two sample t-test). CRISPR-SeroSeq was used to determine the relative frequency of Salmonella serovars in each sample and culture condition. The proportion of multiserovar populations observed in the selective pre-enrichment conditions (53%, 29/55) was not significantly different from those in selective enrichment conditions (56%, 39/70; p = 0.1, McNemar's chi-squared test). These findings suggest that increasing the selectivity of the Salmonella pre-enrichment step could eliminate the need for a subsequent selective enrichment, thus reducing the time to Salmonella isolation by 24 hours.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.