Optimizing Salmonella recovery from commercial poultry environmental samples with selective pre-enrichment.

IF 2.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Amy T Siceloff, Nikki W Shariat
{"title":"Optimizing Salmonella recovery from commercial poultry environmental samples with selective pre-enrichment.","authors":"Amy T Siceloff, Nikki W Shariat","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current, culture-based methods for detecting Salmonella are time and resource intensive, as it can take between three to five days with pre-enrichment and selective enrichment steps. Previous work by our group has shortened this process by combining novobiocin and selective ingredients from Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) (malachite green; 0.1 g/L) and tetrathionate (TT) (bile salts; 1 g/L) to BPW in parallel, creating an all-encompassing selective pre-enrichment step. In this study, we sought to validate the use of selective pre-enrichment on commercial poultry live production samples, as the increased presence of background bacteria may limit Salmonella recovery. Two pairs of boot sock samples were collected from 35 houses, representing 17 different commercial broiler or breeder farms (n = 70 samples). The samples were cultured under selective pre-enrichment conditions in parallel with standard non-selective pre-enrichment (BPW) followed by selective enrichment (RV, TT). Additionally, molecular enumeration was performed to quantify the amount of Salmonella present in each sample. Overall, Salmonella was found in 74% (52/70) of samples collected, and selective pre-enrichment and selective enrichment conditions each recovered Salmonella in 14/17 farms. The average quantity per sample was greater in those recovered with selective pre-enrichment (5.2 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/sample) than those that were not (3.0 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/sample; p = 0.01, Welch two sample t-test). CRISPR-SeroSeq was used to determine the relative frequency of Salmonella serovars in each sample and culture condition. The proportion of multiserovar populations observed in the selective pre-enrichment conditions (53%, 29/55) was not significantly different from those in selective enrichment conditions (56%, 39/70; p = 0.1, McNemar's chi-squared test). These findings suggest that increasing the selectivity of the Salmonella pre-enrichment step could eliminate the need for a subsequent selective enrichment, thus reducing the time to Salmonella isolation by 24 hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":" ","pages":"100627"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current, culture-based methods for detecting Salmonella are time and resource intensive, as it can take between three to five days with pre-enrichment and selective enrichment steps. Previous work by our group has shortened this process by combining novobiocin and selective ingredients from Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) (malachite green; 0.1 g/L) and tetrathionate (TT) (bile salts; 1 g/L) to BPW in parallel, creating an all-encompassing selective pre-enrichment step. In this study, we sought to validate the use of selective pre-enrichment on commercial poultry live production samples, as the increased presence of background bacteria may limit Salmonella recovery. Two pairs of boot sock samples were collected from 35 houses, representing 17 different commercial broiler or breeder farms (n = 70 samples). The samples were cultured under selective pre-enrichment conditions in parallel with standard non-selective pre-enrichment (BPW) followed by selective enrichment (RV, TT). Additionally, molecular enumeration was performed to quantify the amount of Salmonella present in each sample. Overall, Salmonella was found in 74% (52/70) of samples collected, and selective pre-enrichment and selective enrichment conditions each recovered Salmonella in 14/17 farms. The average quantity per sample was greater in those recovered with selective pre-enrichment (5.2 log10 CFU/sample) than those that were not (3.0 log10 CFU/sample; p = 0.01, Welch two sample t-test). CRISPR-SeroSeq was used to determine the relative frequency of Salmonella serovars in each sample and culture condition. The proportion of multiserovar populations observed in the selective pre-enrichment conditions (53%, 29/55) was not significantly different from those in selective enrichment conditions (56%, 39/70; p = 0.1, McNemar's chi-squared test). These findings suggest that increasing the selectivity of the Salmonella pre-enrichment step could eliminate the need for a subsequent selective enrichment, thus reducing the time to Salmonella isolation by 24 hours.

选择性预富集法优化商品家禽环境样品中沙门氏菌的回收
目前,基于培养的检测沙门氏菌的方法是时间和资源密集型的,因为它可能需要3到5天的预富集和选择性富集步骤。本小组之前的工作缩短了这一过程,通过将新生物素和Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV)(孔雀石绿,0.1 g/L)和四硫酸盐(TT)(胆盐,1 g/L)的选择性成分平行结合到BPW,创造了一个全面的选择性预富集步骤。在这项研究中,我们试图验证在商业家禽生产样品上选择性预富集的使用,因为背景细菌的增加可能会限制沙门氏菌的恢复。从代表17个不同商业肉鸡或种鸡场的35个鸡舍中收集了两对靴袜样本(n = 70个样本)。样品在选择性预富集条件下与标准非选择性预富集(BPW)平行培养,然后进行选择性富集(RV, TT)。此外,分子枚举进行了量化沙门氏菌存在于每个样品的数量。总体而言,74%(52/70)的样品中检出沙门氏菌,其中14/17个农场的选择性预富集和选择性富集条件各检出沙门氏菌。选择性预富集回收率(5.2 log10 CFU/样品)高于非选择性预富集回收率(3.0 log10 CFU/样品,p = 0.01, Welch双样本t检验)。采用crispr - serseq技术测定每个样品和培养条件中沙门氏菌血清型的相对频率。选择性预富集条件下观察到的多血清型群体比例(53%,29/55)与选择性富集条件下观察到的多血清型群体比例(56%,39/70;p = 0.1, McNemar卡方检验)无显著差异。这些发现表明,提高沙门氏菌预富集步骤的选择性可以消除后续选择性富集的需要,从而减少沙门氏菌分离时间24小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信