Kathleen R Schildroth, Jonathan S Chang, T Michael Nork, Justin L Gottlieb, Maxwell J Wingelaar, Paul S Boeke, Michael S Ip, Kyle Peterson, Michael M Altaweel
{"title":"Intraocular Pressure Control and Long-Term Outcomes With the Reservoir Technique: The Wisconsin Silicone Oil Study (Report 2).","authors":"Kathleen R Schildroth, Jonathan S Chang, T Michael Nork, Justin L Gottlieb, Maxwell J Wingelaar, Paul S Boeke, Michael S Ip, Kyle Peterson, Michael M Altaweel","doi":"10.1177/24741264251376041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the long-term outcomes of silicone oil (SO) tamponade using the reservoir technique vs standard oil fill technique for complex vitreoretinal surgery. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective comparative case series evaluated 313 SO tamponade surgeries (230 eyes). In the reservoir technique, the posterior segment is filled with SO. The infusion line is temporarily opened to atmosphere, allowing SO to egress into the line, creating the reservoir. The pressurized air infusion is then reset to 15 mm Hg to maintain a complete SO fill during sclerotomy closure. In the palpation method, SO is introduced without creating a reservoir or moderating infusion pressure, and digital palpation of the globe determines adequate fill. <b>Results:</b> Moderately severe ocular hypertension (intraocular pressure [IOP] ≥ 30 mm Hg) occurred less frequently in the reservoir group (1.6%) compared with the palpation group (9.3%; <i>P</i> = .005). Prolonged ocular hypertension (IOP ≥ 25 mm Hg for ≥ 2 visits) was also less frequent in the reservoir group (2.9% vs 9.1%; <i>P</i> = .02). SO emulsification was less frequent in the reservoir group (2.7% vs 9.4%; <i>P</i> = .04). Eyes in the reservoir group required fewer SO placement surgeries (1.2 vs 1.5 surgeries per eye; <i>P</i> = .01), while final anatomic success rates were similar (reservoir: 80.4%, palpation: 78.2%; <i>P</i> = .5). Visual outcomes were comparable between groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> The reservoir technique for SO tamponade placement reduces the risk of IOP elevation, minimizes the need for reoperation, and decreases SO complications. These findings support the reservoir technique as a reliable and consistent method for SO placement in complex vitreoretinal surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"24741264251376041"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251376041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of silicone oil (SO) tamponade using the reservoir technique vs standard oil fill technique for complex vitreoretinal surgery. Methods: This retrospective comparative case series evaluated 313 SO tamponade surgeries (230 eyes). In the reservoir technique, the posterior segment is filled with SO. The infusion line is temporarily opened to atmosphere, allowing SO to egress into the line, creating the reservoir. The pressurized air infusion is then reset to 15 mm Hg to maintain a complete SO fill during sclerotomy closure. In the palpation method, SO is introduced without creating a reservoir or moderating infusion pressure, and digital palpation of the globe determines adequate fill. Results: Moderately severe ocular hypertension (intraocular pressure [IOP] ≥ 30 mm Hg) occurred less frequently in the reservoir group (1.6%) compared with the palpation group (9.3%; P = .005). Prolonged ocular hypertension (IOP ≥ 25 mm Hg for ≥ 2 visits) was also less frequent in the reservoir group (2.9% vs 9.1%; P = .02). SO emulsification was less frequent in the reservoir group (2.7% vs 9.4%; P = .04). Eyes in the reservoir group required fewer SO placement surgeries (1.2 vs 1.5 surgeries per eye; P = .01), while final anatomic success rates were similar (reservoir: 80.4%, palpation: 78.2%; P = .5). Visual outcomes were comparable between groups. Conclusions: The reservoir technique for SO tamponade placement reduces the risk of IOP elevation, minimizes the need for reoperation, and decreases SO complications. These findings support the reservoir technique as a reliable and consistent method for SO placement in complex vitreoretinal surgeries.
目的:评价储层技术与标准充油技术在复杂玻璃体视网膜手术中硅油填塞的远期疗效。方法:本回顾性比较病例系列评估313例SO填塞手术(230眼)。在储层技术中,后段被SO填充。输注管线暂时向大气开放,允许SO进入管线,形成储液池。然后将加压空气注入重置为15毫米汞柱,以在巩膜切开术关闭期间保持完全的SO填充。在触诊方法中,在不创建储液器或调节输液压力的情况下引入SO,并对球体进行数字触诊以确定足够的填充。结果:与触诊组(9.3%,P = 0.005)相比,水库组中重度高眼压(眼内压[IOP]≥30 mm Hg)发生率(1.6%)较低。长期高眼压(≥2次就诊IOP≥25 mm Hg)在水库组中也较少见(2.9% vs 9.1%; P = 0.02)。储层组SO乳化发生率较低(2.7% vs 9.4%; P = 0.04)。储层组所需的SO放置手术较少(1.2 vs 1.5例/眼;P = 0.01),而最终解剖成功率相似(储层:80.4%,触诊:78.2%;P = 0.5)。两组间的视觉结果具有可比性。结论:采用储液器技术放置眼压填塞可降低眼压升高的风险,减少再手术的需要,并减少眼压并发症。这些发现支持储层技术作为复杂玻璃体视网膜手术中SO放置的可靠和一致的方法。