Body Roundness Index and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Women of Reproductive Age: NHANES 2007-2018.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
International Journal of Women's Health Pub Date : 2025-09-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S551553
Siqi Shi, Chunying Xie, Jingjing Xiao, Yanling Liu, Shu Cai
{"title":"Body Roundness Index and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Women of Reproductive Age: NHANES 2007-2018.","authors":"Siqi Shi, Chunying Xie, Jingjing Xiao, Yanling Liu, Shu Cai","doi":"10.2147/IJWH.S551553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is closely related to obesity. This study investigated whether Body Roundness Index (BRI) is independently associated with GDM and compared its discriminative performance with BMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the 2007-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The study included 3,343 women aged 20-44 years who had available data on BRI and GDM. Weighted logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) models were used to examine the association between BRI and GDM. Subgroup and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to evaluate discriminative performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 3,343 women, 377 (11.3%) reported GDM. Adjusted weighted multivariate logistic regression showed a 39% increase in GDM risk per BRI unit rise (OR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.19-1.62; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis confirmed consistent correlation. RCS analysis revealed a nonlinear relationship at BRI = 3.55, significant below and above (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Based on ROC curve analysis, BRI (AUC = 0.608) was more effective in discriminating between women with and without GDM compared to BMI (AUC = 0.573).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that elevated BRI is independently associated with GDM risk among US reproductive-aged women and shows superior discriminative performance to BMI. These findings highlight the potential value of BRI as an anthropometric indicator associated with GDM risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":14356,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Women's Health","volume":"17 ","pages":"3107-3118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S551553","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is closely related to obesity. This study investigated whether Body Roundness Index (BRI) is independently associated with GDM and compared its discriminative performance with BMI.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the 2007-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The study included 3,343 women aged 20-44 years who had available data on BRI and GDM. Weighted logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) models were used to examine the association between BRI and GDM. Subgroup and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to evaluate discriminative performance.

Results: Among the 3,343 women, 377 (11.3%) reported GDM. Adjusted weighted multivariate logistic regression showed a 39% increase in GDM risk per BRI unit rise (OR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.19-1.62; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis confirmed consistent correlation. RCS analysis revealed a nonlinear relationship at BRI = 3.55, significant below and above (P < 0.05). Based on ROC curve analysis, BRI (AUC = 0.608) was more effective in discriminating between women with and without GDM compared to BMI (AUC = 0.573).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that elevated BRI is independently associated with GDM risk among US reproductive-aged women and shows superior discriminative performance to BMI. These findings highlight the potential value of BRI as an anthropometric indicator associated with GDM risk.

育龄妇女体圆度指数与妊娠期糖尿病的风险:NHANES 2007-2018。
目的:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)与肥胖密切相关。本研究探讨了身体圆度指数(BRI)是否与GDM独立相关,并比较了其与BMI的判别性能。方法:我们使用2007-2018年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据进行了横断面分析。该研究包括3343名年龄在20-44岁之间的女性,她们有BRI和GDM的可用数据。使用加权逻辑回归和限制三次样条(RCS)模型来检验BRI与GDM之间的关系。采用亚组和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来评价鉴别效果。结果:在3343名女性中,377名(11.3%)报告了GDM。调整后的加权多因素logistic回归显示,每单位BRI增加39%的GDM风险(OR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.19-1.62; P < 0.0001)。亚组分析证实了一致的相关性。RCS分析显示,在BRI = 3.55时,两者呈非线性关系,P < 0.05。根据ROC曲线分析,BRI (AUC = 0.608)比BMI (AUC = 0.573)更有效地区分患有和不患有GDM的女性。结论:本研究表明,在美国育龄妇女中,BRI升高与GDM风险独立相关,并且对BMI具有更好的鉴别性能。这些发现强调了BRI作为与GDM风险相关的人体测量指标的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Women's Health
International Journal of Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Women''s Health is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of women''s healthcare including gynecology, obstetrics, and breast cancer. Subject areas include: Chronic conditions including cancers of various organs specific and not specific to women Migraine, headaches, arthritis, osteoporosis Endocrine and autoimmune syndromes - asthma, multiple sclerosis, lupus, diabetes Sexual and reproductive health including fertility patterns and emerging technologies to address infertility Infectious disease with chronic sequelae including HIV/AIDS, HPV, PID, and other STDs Psychological and psychosocial conditions - depression across the life span, substance abuse, domestic violence Health maintenance among aging females - factors affecting the quality of life including physical, social and mental issues Avenues for health promotion and disease prevention across the life span Male vs female incidence comparisons for conditions that affect both genders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信