A Deep Learning Method for Diagnosis of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Y Q Cao, J Y Zhang, M Lu, L J Shi, H X Dan, F D Zhu, P J Huang, G X Zhang, H J Zhang, Q M Chen
{"title":"A Deep Learning Method for Diagnosis of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders.","authors":"Y Q Cao, J Y Zhang, M Lu, L J Shi, H X Dan, F D Zhu, P J Huang, G X Zhang, H J Zhang, Q M Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a two-stage deep learning method for diagnosing oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). We also compared its diagnostic performance with that of clinicians at different levels of seniority and evaluated its utility as a clinical decision support tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-stage deep learning method was developed. CLA OPMD-OOML was designed to differentiate OPMDs from other oral mucosal lesions (OOML), while CLA OPMDs was designed to classify specific OPMD subtypes. The method was trained on an internal dataset (ZJUSS, n = 3,305), and its generalizability was evaluated on two external multicenter datasets (WCHS and CS-SJTU, n = 1,756). In a blinded, two-step comparative study, nine clinicians (junior, intermediate, and senior groups) performed diagnoses independently and then with AI assistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The method significantly outperformed all clinician groups, achieving higher F1 scores in both CLA OPMD-OOML (89.9% vs. 78.4-82.6% for clinicians) and CLA OPMDs (92.2% vs. 77.7-80.0% for clinicians). It showed robust generalizability on the two external datasets, with F1 scores of 87.3% and 86.9% for CLA OPMD-OOML and 75.9-83.0% for CLA OPMDs. With AI assistance, the diagnostic precision of junior and intermediate clinicians increased by 10.8% and 5.9%, respectively, raising the junior group's performance to the level of senior clinicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The developed two-stage deep learning method demonstrated diagnostic performance comparable to or exceeding that of experienced clinicians in classifying OPMDs from clinical images. It functions as a powerful assistive tool that substantially enhances the diagnostic capabilities of junior and intermediate clinicians.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This AI method has the potential to serve as a reliable tool for large-scale early screening of OPMDs, particularly in regions with limited access to specialist dental care. It can also serve as a valuable training and decision support system for junior clinicians, helping to standardize diagnostic accuracy and improve patient outcomes through timely and accurate detection. A supplemental appendix to this article is available online.</p>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"106138"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate a two-stage deep learning method for diagnosing oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). We also compared its diagnostic performance with that of clinicians at different levels of seniority and evaluated its utility as a clinical decision support tool.

Methods: A two-stage deep learning method was developed. CLA OPMD-OOML was designed to differentiate OPMDs from other oral mucosal lesions (OOML), while CLA OPMDs was designed to classify specific OPMD subtypes. The method was trained on an internal dataset (ZJUSS, n = 3,305), and its generalizability was evaluated on two external multicenter datasets (WCHS and CS-SJTU, n = 1,756). In a blinded, two-step comparative study, nine clinicians (junior, intermediate, and senior groups) performed diagnoses independently and then with AI assistance.

Results: The method significantly outperformed all clinician groups, achieving higher F1 scores in both CLA OPMD-OOML (89.9% vs. 78.4-82.6% for clinicians) and CLA OPMDs (92.2% vs. 77.7-80.0% for clinicians). It showed robust generalizability on the two external datasets, with F1 scores of 87.3% and 86.9% for CLA OPMD-OOML and 75.9-83.0% for CLA OPMDs. With AI assistance, the diagnostic precision of junior and intermediate clinicians increased by 10.8% and 5.9%, respectively, raising the junior group's performance to the level of senior clinicians.

Conclusions: The developed two-stage deep learning method demonstrated diagnostic performance comparable to or exceeding that of experienced clinicians in classifying OPMDs from clinical images. It functions as a powerful assistive tool that substantially enhances the diagnostic capabilities of junior and intermediate clinicians.

Clinical significance: This AI method has the potential to serve as a reliable tool for large-scale early screening of OPMDs, particularly in regions with limited access to specialist dental care. It can also serve as a valuable training and decision support system for junior clinicians, helping to standardize diagnostic accuracy and improve patient outcomes through timely and accurate detection. A supplemental appendix to this article is available online.

用于口腔潜在恶性疾病诊断的深度学习方法。
目的:本研究旨在开发和验证一种用于诊断口腔潜在恶性疾病(OPMDs)的两阶段深度学习方法。我们还比较了其诊断性能与临床医生在不同级别的资历,并评估其效用作为临床决策支持工具。方法:提出一种两阶段深度学习方法。CLA OPMD-OOML旨在区分OPMD与其他口腔黏膜病变(OOML),而CLA OPMD旨在对特定的OPMD亚型进行分类。该方法在内部数据集(ZJUSS, n = 3305)上进行训练,并在两个外部多中心数据集(WCHS和CS-SJTU, n = 1756)上评估其通化性。在一项两步盲法比较研究中,九名临床医生(初级、中级和高级组)独立进行诊断,然后在人工智能的帮助下进行诊断。结果:该方法明显优于所有临床医生组,CLA OPMD-OOML (89.9% vs.临床医生78.4-82.6%)和CLA opmd (92.2% vs.临床医生77.7-80.0%)的F1得分均较高。CLA OPMD-OOML的F1得分分别为87.3%和86.9%,CLA opmd的F1得分分别为75.9-83.0%。在人工智能辅助下,初级和中级临床医生的诊断准确率分别提高了10.8%和5.9%,将初级组的绩效提高到高级临床医生的水平。结论:所开发的两阶段深度学习方法在从临床图像中分类opmd方面的诊断性能与经验丰富的临床医生相当或超过。它作为一种强大的辅助工具,大大提高了初级和中级临床医生的诊断能力。临床意义:这种人工智能方法有潜力作为大规模早期筛查opmd的可靠工具,特别是在获得专业牙科护理机会有限的地区。它还可以作为初级临床医生有价值的培训和决策支持系统,有助于通过及时准确的检测来规范诊断准确性并改善患者预后。本文的补充附录可在网上找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of dentistry
Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
349
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信