Degree of Conversion and Microshear Bond Strength of New Composite to Postcured Composite Resin Surface Treated With Ethyl Acetate.

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-09-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijod/3791468
Tayebeh Rostamzadeh, Seyedeh Maryam Tavangar, Fatemeh Golsorkhtabar
{"title":"Degree of Conversion and Microshear Bond Strength of New Composite to Postcured Composite Resin Surface Treated With Ethyl Acetate.","authors":"Tayebeh Rostamzadeh, Seyedeh Maryam Tavangar, Fatemeh Golsorkhtabar","doi":"10.1155/ijod/3791468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to investigate the impact of ethyl acetate (E) surface treatment on the degree of conversion (DC) of postcured composite, measured by the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) method, and its microshear bond strength to the new composite. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A total of 42 composite discs were prepared in a plexiglass mold with a thickness of 2 mm. Both sides of the discs were postcured in the Labolight LV-ӀӀӀ machine for 5 min. The composite discs were then divided into three groups, each containing 14 discs (<i>n</i> = 14), based on the surface treatment method used. It is worth noting that the mentioned division was employed randomly to ensure an unbiased study. The control group received sandblast and silane treatment. The second group was treated with E, while the third group underwent treatment with both E and silane (ESi). Cylindrical composite blocks were bonded to the prepared discs in a tygon tube. All groups underwent 5000 thermal cycles. The microshear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine, and DC before and after treatment with E was determined through FTIR testing. Additionally, samples were examined under a stereomicroscope with a 40x magnification to investigate the failure mode. <b>Results:</b> The microshear bond strength of the control group was significantly higher than that of the other two groups; however, no significant difference was observed between the E and ESi groups (<i>p</i>-value = 0.18). In the control group, cohesive failure whereas in the other two groups, adhesive failure was the most frequent. The FTIR results showed that the application of E resulted in an 11% reduction in DC. <b>Conclusions:</b> The surface treatment of postcured composite, utilizing both chemical and mechanical methods, still results in better bond strength. Although the use of E led to a higher bonding potential of the postcured composite, it did not improve bond strength compared to the control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2025 ","pages":"3791468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/3791468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impact of ethyl acetate (E) surface treatment on the degree of conversion (DC) of postcured composite, measured by the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) method, and its microshear bond strength to the new composite. Materials and Methods: A total of 42 composite discs were prepared in a plexiglass mold with a thickness of 2 mm. Both sides of the discs were postcured in the Labolight LV-ӀӀӀ machine for 5 min. The composite discs were then divided into three groups, each containing 14 discs (n = 14), based on the surface treatment method used. It is worth noting that the mentioned division was employed randomly to ensure an unbiased study. The control group received sandblast and silane treatment. The second group was treated with E, while the third group underwent treatment with both E and silane (ESi). Cylindrical composite blocks were bonded to the prepared discs in a tygon tube. All groups underwent 5000 thermal cycles. The microshear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine, and DC before and after treatment with E was determined through FTIR testing. Additionally, samples were examined under a stereomicroscope with a 40x magnification to investigate the failure mode. Results: The microshear bond strength of the control group was significantly higher than that of the other two groups; however, no significant difference was observed between the E and ESi groups (p-value = 0.18). In the control group, cohesive failure whereas in the other two groups, adhesive failure was the most frequent. The FTIR results showed that the application of E resulted in an 11% reduction in DC. Conclusions: The surface treatment of postcured composite, utilizing both chemical and mechanical methods, still results in better bond strength. Although the use of E led to a higher bonding potential of the postcured composite, it did not improve bond strength compared to the control group.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

新型复合材料与经乙酸乙酯处理后固化复合树脂表面的转化程度及微剪切结合强度。
目的:研究醋酸乙酯(E)表面处理对固化后复合材料转化率(DC)的影响,并通过傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)方法测定其与新复合材料的微剪切结合强度。材料与方法:在厚度为2mm的有机玻璃模具中制备了42个复合圆盘。双侧椎间盘在Labolight LV-ӀӀӀ机器中后固化5min。根据所采用的表面处理方法将复合椎间盘分为三组,每组14个(n = 14)。值得注意的是,上述划分是随机采用的,以确保公正的研究。对照组采用喷砂和硅烷处理。第二组用E治疗,第三组同时用E和硅烷(ESi)治疗。圆柱形的复合块被粘接在一个圆柱形管中制备的圆盘上。所有组均经历5000次热循环。采用万能试验机测定微剪切粘结强度,通过FTIR测试测定E处理前后的DC。此外,在40倍放大的体视显微镜下检查样品以研究失效模式。结果:对照组的微剪切粘结强度显著高于其他两组;E组与ESi组间无显著差异(p值= 0.18)。在对照组中,粘接失败,而在其他两组中,粘接失败最常见。FTIR结果表明,E的应用使直流降低11%。结论:复合材料后固化后的表面处理,采用化学和机械两种方法均可获得较好的粘结强度。虽然E的使用使后固化复合材料的粘合潜力更高,但与对照组相比,它并没有提高粘合强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信