Radiological assessment and potential health risks of naturally occurring radioactive materials in Kuakata Sea Beach sand: implications for rare-earth resources and nuclear fuel cycle feasibility.

IF 1.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR
M M Mahfuz Siraz, Musfik R Fahim, Mohammad Shafiqul Alam, Araf Mahmud, Md Bazlar Rashid, Mayeen Uddin Khandaker, Hamid Osman, Selina Yeasmin
{"title":"Radiological assessment and potential health risks of naturally occurring radioactive materials in Kuakata Sea Beach sand: implications for rare-earth resources and nuclear fuel cycle feasibility.","authors":"M M Mahfuz Siraz, Musfik R Fahim, Mohammad Shafiqul Alam, Araf Mahmud, Md Bazlar Rashid, Mayeen Uddin Khandaker, Hamid Osman, Selina Yeasmin","doi":"10.1080/10256016.2025.2555952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the natural radioactivity levels and associated health risks in beach sand from Kuakata Sea Beach, this study performed a comprehensive radiological analysis of systematically collected sand samples using high-purity germanium (HPGe) γ-ray spectroscopy. The average (range) radioactivity levels of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup>K in the examined sand samples were 57 (37-105), 121 (76-231), and 210 (181-270) Bq kg<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, thus markedly higher than the world average values of 30, 35, and 400 Bq kg<sup>-1</sup> for <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup>K, respectively. The evaluation of different radiological risk parameters indicates values (maximum radium equivalent activity of 449.27 Bq kg<sup>-1</sup>, maximum outdoor absorbed dose rate of 205.58 nGy h<sup>-1</sup>, and maximum external hazard index of 1.21) much higher than the recommended levels, signifying that heavy minerals rich sands could pose a substantial health risk to individuals. The current findings have the potential to generate interest and exploration in rare-earth resources, particularly for their applications in the electronics industry, and thorium based nuclear fuel cycle resources for the next generation nuclear energy industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":14597,"journal":{"name":"Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10256016.2025.2555952","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess the natural radioactivity levels and associated health risks in beach sand from Kuakata Sea Beach, this study performed a comprehensive radiological analysis of systematically collected sand samples using high-purity germanium (HPGe) γ-ray spectroscopy. The average (range) radioactivity levels of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in the examined sand samples were 57 (37-105), 121 (76-231), and 210 (181-270) Bq kg-1, respectively, thus markedly higher than the world average values of 30, 35, and 400 Bq kg-1 for 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K, respectively. The evaluation of different radiological risk parameters indicates values (maximum radium equivalent activity of 449.27 Bq kg-1, maximum outdoor absorbed dose rate of 205.58 nGy h-1, and maximum external hazard index of 1.21) much higher than the recommended levels, signifying that heavy minerals rich sands could pose a substantial health risk to individuals. The current findings have the potential to generate interest and exploration in rare-earth resources, particularly for their applications in the electronics industry, and thorium based nuclear fuel cycle resources for the next generation nuclear energy industry.

夸田海滩沙子中天然存在的放射性物质的放射评估和潜在健康风险:对稀土资源和核燃料循环可行性的影响。
为了评估Kuakata海滩沙滩砂的天然放射性水平和相关的健康风险,本研究使用高纯度锗(HPGe) γ射线能谱对系统收集的沙滩样品进行了全面的放射学分析。226Ra、232Th和40K的平均(范围)放射性水平分别为57(37-105)、121(76-231)和210 (181-270)Bq kg-1,明显高于226Ra、232Th和40K的世界平均值30、35和400 Bq kg-1。对不同辐射风险参数的评估表明,其辐射风险值(最大镭当量活度为449.27 Bq kg-1,最大室外吸收剂量率为205.58 nGy h-1,最大外部危害指数为1.21)远高于建议水平,表明富含重矿物质的砂可能对个人构成重大健康风险。目前的发现有可能引起人们对稀土资源的兴趣和探索,特别是它们在电子工业中的应用,以及下一代核能工业的钍基核燃料循环资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies provides a unique platform for stable isotope studies in geological and life sciences, with emphasis on ecology. The international journal publishes original research papers, review articles, short communications, and book reviews relating to the following topics: -variations in natural isotope abundance (isotope ecology, isotope biochemistry, isotope hydrology, isotope geology) -stable isotope tracer techniques to follow the fate of certain substances in soil, water, plants, animals and in the human body -isotope effects and tracer theory linked with mathematical modelling -isotope measurement methods and equipment with respect to environmental and health research -diagnostic stable isotope application in medicine and in health studies -environmental sources of ionizing radiation and its effects on all living matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信