Unveiling the Healing Potential of Energy Therapies in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Implications for Nursing Practice.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Yasemin Karacan, Ayşe Gül Parlak, Serkan Budak, Rıdvan Bayram
{"title":"Unveiling the Healing Potential of Energy Therapies in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Implications for Nursing Practice.","authors":"Yasemin Karacan, Ayşe Gül Parlak, Serkan Budak, Rıdvan Bayram","doi":"10.1097/HNP.0000000000000755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the effects of energy therapies on pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], forced vital capacity [FVC], and FEV1/FVC), exercise capacity (6-Minute Walking Test [6MWT]), and quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Conducted per PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO, this meta-analysis included 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified through systematic searches of Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, EBSCO, Embase, and Cochrane Library (June 2024-January 2025). Data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3 software, with heterogeneity and publication bias assessments. Energy therapies significantly improved 6MWT scores (95% CI, P < .05) and SGRQ scores, enhancing quality of life. Patients receiving energy therapy showed increased walking distance, particularly when combined with pulmonary rehabilitation. SGRQ results indicated better quality of life, mainly due to reduced stress and anxiety. However, no significant improvement was found in FEV1, FVC, or FEV1/FVC values (P > 0.05), suggesting limited direct effects on pulmonary function. Methodological variations and sample size differences contributed to result inconsistencies. Energy therapies may complement COPD treatment by improving exercise capacity and quality of life. However, large-scale, long-term RCTs are needed to clarify their impact on pulmonary function.</p>","PeriodicalId":13081,"journal":{"name":"Holistic Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Holistic Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000755","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the effects of energy therapies on pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], forced vital capacity [FVC], and FEV1/FVC), exercise capacity (6-Minute Walking Test [6MWT]), and quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Conducted per PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO, this meta-analysis included 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified through systematic searches of Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, EBSCO, Embase, and Cochrane Library (June 2024-January 2025). Data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3 software, with heterogeneity and publication bias assessments. Energy therapies significantly improved 6MWT scores (95% CI, P < .05) and SGRQ scores, enhancing quality of life. Patients receiving energy therapy showed increased walking distance, particularly when combined with pulmonary rehabilitation. SGRQ results indicated better quality of life, mainly due to reduced stress and anxiety. However, no significant improvement was found in FEV1, FVC, or FEV1/FVC values (P > 0.05), suggesting limited direct effects on pulmonary function. Methodological variations and sample size differences contributed to result inconsistencies. Energy therapies may complement COPD treatment by improving exercise capacity and quality of life. However, large-scale, long-term RCTs are needed to clarify their impact on pulmonary function.

揭示能量疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的潜力:一项对护理实践意义的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了能量疗法对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者肺功能(1秒用力呼气量[FEV1]、用力肺活量[FVC]和FEV1/FVC)、运动能力(6分钟步行试验[6MWT])和生活质量(圣乔治呼吸问卷[SGRQ])的影响。根据PRISMA指南进行并在PROSPERO注册,本荟萃分析包括8项随机对照试验(rct),通过Web of Science, PubMed, b谷歌Scholar, EBSCO, Embase和Cochrane Library(2024年6月至2025年1月)的系统检索确定。数据分析采用综合Meta-Analysis Version 3软件,进行异质性和发表偏倚评估。能量疗法显著提高了6MWT评分(95% CI, p0.05),表明对肺功能的直接影响有限。方法的变化和样本量的差异导致了结果的不一致。能量疗法可以通过提高运动能力和生活质量来补充COPD治疗。然而,需要大规模、长期的随机对照试验来阐明它们对肺功能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Holistic Nursing Practice
Holistic Nursing Practice INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-NURSING
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Holistic Nursing Practice (HNP), The Science of Health and Healing, is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that explores holistic models of nursing practice. Content emphasizes complementary traditional and holistic nursing and healthcare practices. Articles include theory-based interventions and their outcomes, including: innovations in holistic nursing practice; research related to holistic nursing practice, health care, and policy; and values and ethical-legal issues related to holistic nursing practices. The holistic approach is a worldview that emphasizes the potential for health and healing in human systems rather than on disease process and deficit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信