Double Filtration Plasmapheresis for Environmental Toxin Removal: A Case Series of Patients With Hyperlipoproteinemia(a)

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Yandy Marx Castillo-Aleman, Carlos Agustin Villegas-Valverde, Maysoon Al-Karam, Shinnette Lumame, Jay Mary Rose-Roque, Ehab Bawadi, Dina El-Mouzain, Stefano Benedetti, Yendry Ventura-Carmenate, Fatema Mohammed Al-Kaabi, Antonio Alfonso Bencomo-Hernandez, Alexander Sach, David Andel, Yannick P. Kok, Rupert Handgretinger, Stefan R. Bornstein
{"title":"Double Filtration Plasmapheresis for Environmental Toxin Removal: A Case Series of Patients With Hyperlipoproteinemia(a)","authors":"Yandy Marx Castillo-Aleman,&nbsp;Carlos Agustin Villegas-Valverde,&nbsp;Maysoon Al-Karam,&nbsp;Shinnette Lumame,&nbsp;Jay Mary Rose-Roque,&nbsp;Ehab Bawadi,&nbsp;Dina El-Mouzain,&nbsp;Stefano Benedetti,&nbsp;Yendry Ventura-Carmenate,&nbsp;Fatema Mohammed Al-Kaabi,&nbsp;Antonio Alfonso Bencomo-Hernandez,&nbsp;Alexander Sach,&nbsp;David Andel,&nbsp;Yannick P. Kok,&nbsp;Rupert Handgretinger,&nbsp;Stefan R. Bornstein","doi":"10.1002/jca.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) is a promising method for removing environmental toxins, but comparative data on toxin-specific removal patterns remain limited. This study investigates the removal effectiveness of various pollutants in patients with hyperlipoproteinemia(a) undergoing DFPP. We retrospectively analyzed procedures performed using the Inuspheresis System with two filters with differing pore sizes. We assessed the clearance of heavy metals, volatile organic compounds, and organic pollutants by calculating the “<i>redistribution ratio</i>” (RR) and the percentage of captured analyte (CA). Analytes with large volumes of distribution and low protein binding, such as toluene, methyl isobutyl ketone, and barium, showed high rebound (RR: 1.95, 1.31, and 1.97, respectively), suggesting redistribution from peripheral compartments. Moderate rebound was observed for partially protein-bound toxins, including PCB 153 (0.76), PCB 138 (0.74), and hexachlorobenzene (0.66). Low or negative RRs were seen with arsenic (−0.49), mercury (−0.05), and cobalt (0.08), likely reflecting limited redistribution. High CA values were recorded for lipophilic, protein-bound toxins such as PCBs and p,p′-DDE. Herein, we demonstrate that DFPP is effective in removing environmental toxins from the human body. The pharmacokinetic properties of each compound are key determinants of DFPP effectiveness and may help guide the development of personalized detoxification strategies to optimize its clinical use.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"40 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) is a promising method for removing environmental toxins, but comparative data on toxin-specific removal patterns remain limited. This study investigates the removal effectiveness of various pollutants in patients with hyperlipoproteinemia(a) undergoing DFPP. We retrospectively analyzed procedures performed using the Inuspheresis System with two filters with differing pore sizes. We assessed the clearance of heavy metals, volatile organic compounds, and organic pollutants by calculating the “redistribution ratio” (RR) and the percentage of captured analyte (CA). Analytes with large volumes of distribution and low protein binding, such as toluene, methyl isobutyl ketone, and barium, showed high rebound (RR: 1.95, 1.31, and 1.97, respectively), suggesting redistribution from peripheral compartments. Moderate rebound was observed for partially protein-bound toxins, including PCB 153 (0.76), PCB 138 (0.74), and hexachlorobenzene (0.66). Low or negative RRs were seen with arsenic (−0.49), mercury (−0.05), and cobalt (0.08), likely reflecting limited redistribution. High CA values were recorded for lipophilic, protein-bound toxins such as PCBs and p,p′-DDE. Herein, we demonstrate that DFPP is effective in removing environmental toxins from the human body. The pharmacokinetic properties of each compound are key determinants of DFPP effectiveness and may help guide the development of personalized detoxification strategies to optimize its clinical use.

Abstract Image

双重过滤血浆置换去除环境毒素:高脂蛋白血症患者病例系列(A)。
双滤浆分离法(DFPP)是一种很有前途的去除环境毒素的方法,但关于毒素特异性去除模式的比较数据仍然有限。本研究探讨了接受DFPP治疗的高脂蛋白血症(a)患者对各种污染物的去除效果。我们回顾性分析了使用两种不同孔径过滤器的Inuspheresis系统所执行的程序。我们通过计算“再分配比”(RR)和捕获分析物(CA)的百分比来评估重金属、挥发性有机化合物和有机污染物的清除。大体积分布和低蛋白结合的分析物,如甲苯、甲基异丁基酮和钡,表现出高反弹(RR分别为1.95、1.31和1.97),表明来自周围隔室的再分布。对部分蛋白结合毒素,包括PCB 153(0.76)、PCB 138(0.74)和六氯苯(0.66),观察到中度反弹。砷(-0.49)、汞(-0.05)和钴(0.08)的相对危险度较低或为负,可能反映了再分配有限。高CA值记录的亲脂性,蛋白质结合毒素,如多氯联苯和p,p'-DDE。在此,我们证明了DFPP在清除人体环境毒素方面是有效的。每种化合物的药代动力学性质是DFPP有效性的关键决定因素,可能有助于指导个性化解毒策略的发展,以优化其临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信