The influence of partial sleep restriction on repeated sprint ability and reaction time in university athletes.

IF 2.6 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-09-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2025.1519987
Benjamin R Wannell, Felix M J Brunner, Zoe Lovibond, Bert O Bond
{"title":"The influence of partial sleep restriction on repeated sprint ability and reaction time in university athletes.","authors":"Benjamin R Wannell, Felix M J Brunner, Zoe Lovibond, Bert O Bond","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2025.1519987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Few studies have assessed the influence of acute sleep restriction on repeated sprint ability and reaction time, which are important characteristics of many sports. Additionally, no within-measures study has compared the acute effect of interrupting sleep to an equivalent quantity of sleep lost by going to bed late. This study examined the influence of sleep restriction, achieved by going to sleep late, or by interrupting sleep, on repeated sprint ability and reaction time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen university team sport players completed 3 conditions in a counterbalanced order; (1) normal sleep (\"Control\"), (2) 50% sleep loss achieved by going to be late (\"Late\"), and (3) 50% sleep loss achieved by waking in the middle of their scheduled sleep (\"Interrupt\"). The following morning, participants completed ten, 8 s all-out cycle sprints, each separated by 52 s recovery. Reaction time to a Go/No-Go test was measured during each recovery interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peak and minimum power output for each repeated sprint interval was always lower in the Late [mean difference (MD) -17 W, <i>P</i> = 0.014, and MD -14 W, <i>P</i> = 0.022] and Interrupt conditions (MD -25 W, <i>P</i> < 0.001 and MD -24 W, <i>P</i> < 0.001), compared to Control. Additionally, average power output was lower across all sprint attempts in Interrupt (MD -14 W, <i>P</i> = 0.007), but not Late (MD -7 W, <i>P</i> = 0.170) compared to Control. Reaction time was never different between conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One night of 50% sleep loss can acutely impair repeated sprint ability. Interrupting sleep might be more deleterious than an equivalent amount of sleep lost through late sleep onset.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"7 ","pages":"1519987"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1519987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Few studies have assessed the influence of acute sleep restriction on repeated sprint ability and reaction time, which are important characteristics of many sports. Additionally, no within-measures study has compared the acute effect of interrupting sleep to an equivalent quantity of sleep lost by going to bed late. This study examined the influence of sleep restriction, achieved by going to sleep late, or by interrupting sleep, on repeated sprint ability and reaction time.

Methods: Sixteen university team sport players completed 3 conditions in a counterbalanced order; (1) normal sleep ("Control"), (2) 50% sleep loss achieved by going to be late ("Late"), and (3) 50% sleep loss achieved by waking in the middle of their scheduled sleep ("Interrupt"). The following morning, participants completed ten, 8 s all-out cycle sprints, each separated by 52 s recovery. Reaction time to a Go/No-Go test was measured during each recovery interval.

Results: Peak and minimum power output for each repeated sprint interval was always lower in the Late [mean difference (MD) -17 W, P = 0.014, and MD -14 W, P = 0.022] and Interrupt conditions (MD -25 W, P < 0.001 and MD -24 W, P < 0.001), compared to Control. Additionally, average power output was lower across all sprint attempts in Interrupt (MD -14 W, P = 0.007), but not Late (MD -7 W, P = 0.170) compared to Control. Reaction time was never different between conditions.

Conclusion: One night of 50% sleep loss can acutely impair repeated sprint ability. Interrupting sleep might be more deleterious than an equivalent amount of sleep lost through late sleep onset.

部分睡眠限制对大学生运动员重复冲刺能力和反应时间的影响。
很少有研究评估急性睡眠限制对重复冲刺能力和反应时间的影响,这是许多运动的重要特征。此外,没有一项内部研究将睡眠中断的急性影响与晚睡造成的等量睡眠损失进行了比较。这项研究考察了睡眠限制对重复冲刺能力和反应时间的影响,包括晚睡或中断睡眠。方法:16名大学生运动队队员按平衡顺序完成3个条件;(1)正常睡眠(“控制”),(2)50%的睡眠损失是由于迟到(“迟到”),(3)50%的睡眠损失是由于在他们预定的睡眠中醒来(“中断”)。第二天早上,参与者完成了1085秒的全速冲刺,每次间隔52秒的恢复。在每个恢复间隔内测量Go/No-Go测试的反应时间。结果:与对照组相比,在后期[平均差(MD) -17 W, P = 0.014, MD -14 W, P = 0.022]和中断条件(MD -25 W, P < 0.001和MD -24 W, P < 0.001),每个重复冲刺间隔的峰值和最小功率输出始终较低。此外,与控制相比,中断中所有冲刺尝试的平均功率输出较低(MD -14 W, P = 0.007),但不晚(MD -7 W, P = 0.170)。不同条件下的反应时间没有差异。结论:一晚睡眠不足50%可严重损害重复冲刺能力。睡眠中断可能比因晚睡而失去同等数量的睡眠更有害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信