Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Facilitates Quantitative Depth Monitoring of Pulsed Field Ablation: An Impedimetric Approach with Preclinical Validation.
Yuyi Guo, Rui Han, Rongrong Liu, Kai Zhu, Jinsong Guo, Junfeng Rao, Qun Wang, Qiancheng Zhao, Fukun Shi, Jie Zhuang
{"title":"Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Facilitates Quantitative Depth Monitoring of Pulsed Field Ablation: An Impedimetric Approach with Preclinical Validation.","authors":"Yuyi Guo, Rui Han, Rongrong Liu, Kai Zhu, Jinsong Guo, Junfeng Rao, Qun Wang, Qiancheng Zhao, Fukun Shi, Jie Zhuang","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.09.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging therapy for cardiac ablation, where ablation depth (D) is critical to procedural success. However, real-time intraprocedural assessment of D remains a challenging task.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) has been proposed to predict ablation zone, but its applicability and mechanism for quantifying D is still unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Monopolar and bipolar PFA were conducted via two catheter types, along with in-situ EIS measurements. The change rate of low-frequency resistance (LFR), derived from Cole-Cole modeling of EIS data, was used to evaluate D in both in vitro (205 potato samples) and in vivo canine models (n=5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LFR versus ablation depths followed a classical Gompertz growth model within 0∼15 mm (R<sup>2</sup>=0.8789). A quadratic function provided a good fit for evaluating ablation depths within 1∼9 mm (R<sup>2</sup>=0.7561). Furthermore, LFR<sub>5min</sub> could detect a depth difference of approximately 0.8 mm in canine cardiac ablation (P=0.0003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LFR<sub>5min</sub> robustly correlated with PFA lesion depth, fitting quantitative quadratic and Gompertz models. Validated in vivo in a clinically relevant canine cardiac model, LFR<sub>5min</sub> resolved sub-millimeter depth differences, positioning it as a promising intraoperative metric for real-time PFA guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.09.034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging therapy for cardiac ablation, where ablation depth (D) is critical to procedural success. However, real-time intraprocedural assessment of D remains a challenging task.
Objective: Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) has been proposed to predict ablation zone, but its applicability and mechanism for quantifying D is still unclear.
Methods: Monopolar and bipolar PFA were conducted via two catheter types, along with in-situ EIS measurements. The change rate of low-frequency resistance (LFR), derived from Cole-Cole modeling of EIS data, was used to evaluate D in both in vitro (205 potato samples) and in vivo canine models (n=5).
Results: LFR versus ablation depths followed a classical Gompertz growth model within 0∼15 mm (R2=0.8789). A quadratic function provided a good fit for evaluating ablation depths within 1∼9 mm (R2=0.7561). Furthermore, LFR5min could detect a depth difference of approximately 0.8 mm in canine cardiac ablation (P=0.0003).
Conclusions: LFR5min robustly correlated with PFA lesion depth, fitting quantitative quadratic and Gompertz models. Validated in vivo in a clinically relevant canine cardiac model, LFR5min resolved sub-millimeter depth differences, positioning it as a promising intraoperative metric for real-time PFA guidance.
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.