A comparative study of postural fixation techniques for radiotherapy in upper abdominal malignancies.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1625478
Ji-Hua Han, Dong-Cheng He, Xiao-Ye Zhang, Yan Zhang, Jun Hong, Ting-Ting Shi, Zhi-Jian Zhu
{"title":"A comparative study of postural fixation techniques for radiotherapy in upper abdominal malignancies.","authors":"Ji-Hua Han, Dong-Cheng He, Xiao-Ye Zhang, Yan Zhang, Jun Hong, Ting-Ting Shi, Zhi-Jian Zhu","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1625478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we investigated the impact of two distinct postural fixation techniques on the incidence of setup errors in patients with upper abdominal malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-seven patients with upper abdominal malignancies were divided into two groups: an observation group comprising 31 patients managed with a combination of thermoplastic body film and an air bag, and a control group consisting of 46 patients managed solely with thermoplastic body film. Prior to radiotherapy, a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was performed, followed by registration of CBCT scans and positioning computed tomography (CT) images. Setup errors along the X (left/right), Y (superior/inferior), and Z (anterior/posterior) axes of the two groups were recorded and analyzed. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for data analysis. Random errors (Σ), systematic errors (σ), and planning target volume (PTV) margins (MPTV) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three-directional setup errors of the observation group [X: 1.9 (0.90, 2.73), Y: 2.5 (1.48, 3.7), Z: 1.4 (0.78, 2.3)] and the resultant displacement vector [T: 3.97 (3.08, 5.32)] exhibited lower magnitudes compared to those observed in the control group [X: 2.3 (1.1, 3.6), Y: 3.5 (2.1, 5.4), Z: 1.8 (0.9, 3.1); T: 5.51 (4.18, 7.25)]. These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Notably, the Σ, σ, and MPTV in the observation group were consistently smaller than those observed in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined use of thermoplastic body film and an air bag in postural fixation significantly reduces setup errors during radiotherapy for patients with upper abdominal tumors. This combined approach enhances the precision of postural alignment, thereby improving positional repeatability and reducing both random and systematic errors. Furthermore, this method is associated with decreased planning target volume margins, providing better protection to adjacent normal tissue structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1625478"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1625478","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we investigated the impact of two distinct postural fixation techniques on the incidence of setup errors in patients with upper abdominal malignancies.

Methods: Seventy-seven patients with upper abdominal malignancies were divided into two groups: an observation group comprising 31 patients managed with a combination of thermoplastic body film and an air bag, and a control group consisting of 46 patients managed solely with thermoplastic body film. Prior to radiotherapy, a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was performed, followed by registration of CBCT scans and positioning computed tomography (CT) images. Setup errors along the X (left/right), Y (superior/inferior), and Z (anterior/posterior) axes of the two groups were recorded and analyzed. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for data analysis. Random errors (Σ), systematic errors (σ), and planning target volume (PTV) margins (MPTV) were evaluated.

Results: The three-directional setup errors of the observation group [X: 1.9 (0.90, 2.73), Y: 2.5 (1.48, 3.7), Z: 1.4 (0.78, 2.3)] and the resultant displacement vector [T: 3.97 (3.08, 5.32)] exhibited lower magnitudes compared to those observed in the control group [X: 2.3 (1.1, 3.6), Y: 3.5 (2.1, 5.4), Z: 1.8 (0.9, 3.1); T: 5.51 (4.18, 7.25)]. These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Notably, the Σ, σ, and MPTV in the observation group were consistently smaller than those observed in the control group.

Conclusion: The combined use of thermoplastic body film and an air bag in postural fixation significantly reduces setup errors during radiotherapy for patients with upper abdominal tumors. This combined approach enhances the precision of postural alignment, thereby improving positional repeatability and reducing both random and systematic errors. Furthermore, this method is associated with decreased planning target volume margins, providing better protection to adjacent normal tissue structures.

上腹部恶性肿瘤放射治疗体位固定技术的比较研究。
目的:在本研究中,我们研究了两种不同的姿势固定技术对上腹部恶性肿瘤患者设置错误发生率的影响。方法:将77例上腹部恶性肿瘤患者分为两组:观察组31例采用热塑性体膜联合气囊处理,对照组46例采用热塑性体膜单独处理。在放射治疗之前,进行锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)扫描,随后进行CBCT扫描和定位计算机断层扫描(CT)图像的配准。记录并分析两组沿X轴(左/右)、Y轴(上/下)和Z轴(前/后)的设置误差。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验进行数据分析。对随机误差(Σ)、系统误差(Σ)和规划目标体积(PTV)裕度(MPTV)进行了评价。结果:观察组的三方向设置误差[X: 1.9 (0.90, 2.73), Y: 2.5 (1.48, 3.7), Z: 1.4(0.78, 2.3)]和由此产生的位移矢量[T: 3.97(3.08, 5.32)]与对照组[X: 2.3 (1.1, 3.6), Y: 3.5 (2.1, 5.4), Z: 1.8(0.9, 3.1)]相比,显示出更小的幅度;[05:51(4.18, 7.25)]。差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。值得注意的是,观察组的Σ、Σ、MPTV均小于对照组。结论:热塑性体膜与气囊联合应用于上腹部肿瘤患者的体位固定可显著减少放射治疗中的设置错误。这种组合方法提高了姿态对准的精度,从而提高了位置的可重复性,减少了随机误差和系统误差。此外,该方法与减少规划靶体积边缘有关,为邻近的正常组织结构提供更好的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信