Zhi-Qian Sun, Shuai Li, Bao-Quan Zhu, Qi-Yu Sun, Min Li
{"title":"<sup>125</sup>I seed brachytherapy with cement augmentation versus cement alone for acetabular metastases: a comparative study.","authors":"Zhi-Qian Sun, Shuai Li, Bao-Quan Zhu, Qi-Yu Sun, Min Li","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1673676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As the survival of cancer patients improves, the incidence of bone metastases increases. Acetabular metastases often cause severe pain, limit hip mobility, and impair quality of life. Percutaneous cement augmentation (PCA) provides short-term pain relief and improves mechanical stability, but its anti-tumor effect is limited. <sup>125</sup>I seed brachytherapy offers precise local tumor control but cannot enhance bone strength. We proposed a novel strategy combining <sup>125</sup>I seeds with cement augmentation to achieve better tumor killing and bone stabilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 64 patients (determined by power analysis assuming α=0.05, β=0.2, and expected difference in VAS scores of 1.5) with acetabular metastases who underwent either PCA alone (group A, n=34) or <sup>125</sup>I seed brachytherapy plus PCA (group B, n=30) between December 2008 and December 2022. Pain intensity (VAS), functional status (ECOG), and complications were evaluated as primary endpoints before and up to 6 months after treatment. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. Group B showed significantly lower mean VAS scores (mean difference: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.6-2.6; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and ECOG scores (mean difference: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.1-1.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001) at 6 months post-treatment compared to group A. Complication rates were comparable between groups (5.9% vs 3.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.62), with no significant difference in median survival (16.8 vs 16.7 months, <i>p</i> = 0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined ¹²<sup>5</sup>I seed brachytherapy and PCA (¹²<sup>5</sup>I-PCA) provides superior long-term pain control and functional outcomes compared to PCA alone for acetabular metastases. This is attributed to the synergistic effect of PMMA-mediated mechanical stabilization and continuous low-dose radiation-induced tumor suppression, effectively addressing the transient cytoreduction limitation of standalone PCA. Integration of TPS(Treatment Planning System)-guided brachytherapy dosing with precise CT-guided cementoplasty represents an effective and safe palliative strategy for these complex lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1673676"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1673676","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: As the survival of cancer patients improves, the incidence of bone metastases increases. Acetabular metastases often cause severe pain, limit hip mobility, and impair quality of life. Percutaneous cement augmentation (PCA) provides short-term pain relief and improves mechanical stability, but its anti-tumor effect is limited. 125I seed brachytherapy offers precise local tumor control but cannot enhance bone strength. We proposed a novel strategy combining 125I seeds with cement augmentation to achieve better tumor killing and bone stabilization.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 64 patients (determined by power analysis assuming α=0.05, β=0.2, and expected difference in VAS scores of 1.5) with acetabular metastases who underwent either PCA alone (group A, n=34) or 125I seed brachytherapy plus PCA (group B, n=30) between December 2008 and December 2022. Pain intensity (VAS), functional status (ECOG), and complications were evaluated as primary endpoints before and up to 6 months after treatment. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test.
Results: The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. Group B showed significantly lower mean VAS scores (mean difference: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.6-2.6; p < 0.001) and ECOG scores (mean difference: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.1-1.9; p < 0.001) at 6 months post-treatment compared to group A. Complication rates were comparable between groups (5.9% vs 3.0%, p = 0.62), with no significant difference in median survival (16.8 vs 16.7 months, p = 0.85).
Conclusion: Combined ¹²5I seed brachytherapy and PCA (¹²5I-PCA) provides superior long-term pain control and functional outcomes compared to PCA alone for acetabular metastases. This is attributed to the synergistic effect of PMMA-mediated mechanical stabilization and continuous low-dose radiation-induced tumor suppression, effectively addressing the transient cytoreduction limitation of standalone PCA. Integration of TPS(Treatment Planning System)-guided brachytherapy dosing with precise CT-guided cementoplasty represents an effective and safe palliative strategy for these complex lesions.
目的:随着肿瘤患者生存率的提高,骨转移的发生率也随之增加。髋臼转移常引起剧烈疼痛,限制髋关节活动,影响生活质量。经皮骨水泥增强术(PCA)可以短期缓解疼痛,提高机械稳定性,但其抗肿瘤作用有限。125I种子近距离治疗提供精确的局部肿瘤控制,但不能增强骨强度。我们提出了一种将125I粒子与骨水泥增强相结合的新策略,以实现更好的肿瘤杀伤和骨稳定。方法:回顾性分析2008年12月至2022年12月期间,64例髋臼转移患者(采用功率分析,假设α=0.05, β=0.2,预期VAS评分差异为1.5)分别接受单纯PCA治疗(A组,n=34)或125I种子近距离放疗加PCA治疗(B组,n=30)。疼痛强度(VAS)、功能状态(ECOG)和并发症作为治疗前和治疗后6个月的主要终点进行评估。生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验。结果:两组患者基线特征相似。与a组相比,B组治疗后6个月的平均VAS评分(平均差异:2.1;95% CI: 1.6-2.6; p < 0.001)和ECOG评分(平均差异:1.51;95% CI: 1.1-1.9; p < 0.001)显著低于a组。两组间并发症发生率相当(5.9% vs 3.0%, p = 0.62),中位生存期无显著差异(16.8 vs 16.7个月,p = 0.85)。结论:对于髋臼转移瘤,联合¹²5I种子近距离治疗与PCA(¹²5I-PCA)相比,具有更好的长期疼痛控制和功能预后。这是由于pmma介导的机械稳定和持续低剂量辐射诱导的肿瘤抑制的协同作用,有效地解决了独立PCA的短暂细胞减少限制。TPS(治疗计划系统)引导下的近距离治疗剂量与精确的ct引导下的骨水泥成形术相结合,对于这些复杂的病变是一种有效和安全的姑息策略。
期刊介绍:
Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.