Teachers' and students' use of ChatGPT at Social science faculty in the public and private Universities of Bangladesh.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2025-09-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.161351.2
Arifur Rahman, Md Khairul Islam, Abdullah Al-Mamun, Md Shahidul Islam
{"title":"Teachers' and students' use of ChatGPT at Social science faculty in the public and private Universities of Bangladesh.","authors":"Arifur Rahman, Md Khairul Islam, Abdullah Al-Mamun, Md Shahidul Islam","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.161351.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bangladesh is an emerging country where teachers and students of public and private universities have started using technology in the classrooms. Many teachers and students of social science faculty have an inclination to use ChatGPT for educational and research purposes. This study, centering on this specific context, aims to provide insights into the perception and integration of ChatGPT into the educational practices of an emerging country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a mixed method approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaire survey from 402 teachers and 440 students of eight different public and private universities following a stratified sampling approach. A convenience sampling technique was followed with a view to collecting qualitative data through in-depth interviews of 32 participants, comprising 16 teachers and 16 students from both public and private universities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study presents that students and teachers both have proficiency, yet a gap in expertise persists. Students perceive ChatGPT as beneficial for better learning outcomes, and teachers find it helpful in preparing for classes and instructional materials. Both teachers and students regard ChatGPT requiring minimal effort. While peer influence drives students to use it, this factor does not influence teachers. However, teachers express stronger behavioral intentions to use it in the future compared to students. Nevertheless, ethical use, reliance, and information accuracy continue to raise concerns. Besides, high cost and language barriers are also listed as reasons for limiting accessibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study have significant implications for the development of policies, research endeavors, and teaching-learning practices in the higher education sector covering both public and private universities in Bangladesh and other similar contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.161351.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bangladesh is an emerging country where teachers and students of public and private universities have started using technology in the classrooms. Many teachers and students of social science faculty have an inclination to use ChatGPT for educational and research purposes. This study, centering on this specific context, aims to provide insights into the perception and integration of ChatGPT into the educational practices of an emerging country.

Methods: This study employed a mixed method approach. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaire survey from 402 teachers and 440 students of eight different public and private universities following a stratified sampling approach. A convenience sampling technique was followed with a view to collecting qualitative data through in-depth interviews of 32 participants, comprising 16 teachers and 16 students from both public and private universities.

Results: The study presents that students and teachers both have proficiency, yet a gap in expertise persists. Students perceive ChatGPT as beneficial for better learning outcomes, and teachers find it helpful in preparing for classes and instructional materials. Both teachers and students regard ChatGPT requiring minimal effort. While peer influence drives students to use it, this factor does not influence teachers. However, teachers express stronger behavioral intentions to use it in the future compared to students. Nevertheless, ethical use, reliance, and information accuracy continue to raise concerns. Besides, high cost and language barriers are also listed as reasons for limiting accessibility.

Conclusion: The findings of this study have significant implications for the development of policies, research endeavors, and teaching-learning practices in the higher education sector covering both public and private universities in Bangladesh and other similar contexts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

孟加拉国公立和私立大学社会科学学院的教师和学生使用ChatGPT的情况。
背景:孟加拉国是一个新兴国家,公立和私立大学的教师和学生已经开始在课堂上使用技术。社会科学学院的许多教师和学生都倾向于将ChatGPT用于教育和研究目的。本研究围绕这一特定背景,旨在提供对ChatGPT在新兴国家教育实践中的认知和整合的见解。方法:本研究采用混合方法。采用分层抽样方法,对8所公立和私立大学的402名教师和440名学生进行问卷调查,收集定量数据。采用方便抽样的方法,对来自公立和私立大学的16名教师和16名学生进行了深度访谈,以收集定性数据。结果:研究表明,学生和教师都有熟练程度,但专业知识的差距仍然存在。学生认为ChatGPT有助于取得更好的学习成果,教师也发现它有助于备课和教学材料。老师和学生都认为ChatGPT需要最少的努力。虽然同伴影响促使学生使用它,但这个因素对教师没有影响。然而,与学生相比,教师在未来使用它的行为意愿更强。然而,道德使用、可靠性和信息准确性继续引起人们的关注。此外,高成本和语言障碍也被列为限制可访问性的原因。结论:本研究的发现对孟加拉国公立和私立大学的高等教育部门的政策制定、研究努力和教学实践具有重要意义,以及其他类似的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信