Francisco Javier Plaza-Zamora, Valentín López-Carrasco, Jordi Giner-Donaire, Jaime Gonzalvez-Rey, María Del Carmen Mata-Hernández, Marta Villanueva Pérez
{"title":"Knowledge of Nurses and Primary Care Physicians on Inhaled Therapy Devices and Techniques.","authors":"Francisco Javier Plaza-Zamora, Valentín López-Carrasco, Jordi Giner-Donaire, Jaime Gonzalvez-Rey, María Del Carmen Mata-Hernández, Marta Villanueva Pérez","doi":"10.1177/19412711251380101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> We aimed to assess the knowledge of health care professionals regarding inhaled therapy devices and techniques and to evaluate the effectiveness of a targeted educational intervention. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An educational program designed to update the knowledge and improve the technical skills of these professionals in the use of different types of inhalers was developed. Before and after each training session, we applied an <i>ad hoc</i> questionnaire that consisted of 15 multiple-choice questions on inhaled therapy grouped into three sections, including knowledge about devices used for inhaled therapy, knowledge about inhaler techniques, and knowledge about adherence to inhaled therapy, as well as the Test of the Adherence to Inhalers. The questionnaire also included a summary question. We calculated the mean score and the standard deviation for the pre- and postevaluations, compared the mean scores using Student's <i>t-test,</i> and evaluated the relevance of the changes using Cohen's <i>d</i>. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During the 23 meetings held throughout Spain, 267 participants completed the pretraining questionnaire, including 105 primary care physicians, 90 nurses of specialized care, 41 nurses working in primary care, and 31 health care professionals of various origins. Overall, the mean (SD) total score (i.e., number of correct answers out of a maximum of 15; range 0-15) significantly increased from 8.99 (2.26) to 11.46 (2.50) points, for a mean pre-post difference of 2.5 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Notable issues included the misidentification of device types and confusion between inhalation techniques for pressurized metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers. The mean total scores significantly increased across the three main specialties, with large effect sizes in all cases. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our study suggests that both primary care physicians and nurses have relevant gaps in knowledge- and technique-related issues regarding the use of inhalation devices that could be improved using a brief educational intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19412711251380101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: We aimed to assess the knowledge of health care professionals regarding inhaled therapy devices and techniques and to evaluate the effectiveness of a targeted educational intervention. Methods: An educational program designed to update the knowledge and improve the technical skills of these professionals in the use of different types of inhalers was developed. Before and after each training session, we applied an ad hoc questionnaire that consisted of 15 multiple-choice questions on inhaled therapy grouped into three sections, including knowledge about devices used for inhaled therapy, knowledge about inhaler techniques, and knowledge about adherence to inhaled therapy, as well as the Test of the Adherence to Inhalers. The questionnaire also included a summary question. We calculated the mean score and the standard deviation for the pre- and postevaluations, compared the mean scores using Student's t-test, and evaluated the relevance of the changes using Cohen's d. Results: During the 23 meetings held throughout Spain, 267 participants completed the pretraining questionnaire, including 105 primary care physicians, 90 nurses of specialized care, 41 nurses working in primary care, and 31 health care professionals of various origins. Overall, the mean (SD) total score (i.e., number of correct answers out of a maximum of 15; range 0-15) significantly increased from 8.99 (2.26) to 11.46 (2.50) points, for a mean pre-post difference of 2.5 (p < 0.001). Notable issues included the misidentification of device types and confusion between inhalation techniques for pressurized metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers. The mean total scores significantly increased across the three main specialties, with large effect sizes in all cases. Conclusion: Our study suggests that both primary care physicians and nurses have relevant gaps in knowledge- and technique-related issues regarding the use of inhalation devices that could be improved using a brief educational intervention.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient.
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes:
Pulmonary drug delivery
Airway reactivity and asthma treatment
Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract
Toxic effects of inhaled agents
Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.