Knowledge of Nurses and Primary Care Physicians on Inhaled Therapy Devices and Techniques.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Francisco Javier Plaza-Zamora, Valentín López-Carrasco, Jordi Giner-Donaire, Jaime Gonzalvez-Rey, María Del Carmen Mata-Hernández, Marta Villanueva Pérez
{"title":"Knowledge of Nurses and Primary Care Physicians on Inhaled Therapy Devices and Techniques.","authors":"Francisco Javier Plaza-Zamora, Valentín López-Carrasco, Jordi Giner-Donaire, Jaime Gonzalvez-Rey, María Del Carmen Mata-Hernández, Marta Villanueva Pérez","doi":"10.1177/19412711251380101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> We aimed to assess the knowledge of health care professionals regarding inhaled therapy devices and techniques and to evaluate the effectiveness of a targeted educational intervention. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An educational program designed to update the knowledge and improve the technical skills of these professionals in the use of different types of inhalers was developed. Before and after each training session, we applied an <i>ad hoc</i> questionnaire that consisted of 15 multiple-choice questions on inhaled therapy grouped into three sections, including knowledge about devices used for inhaled therapy, knowledge about inhaler techniques, and knowledge about adherence to inhaled therapy, as well as the Test of the Adherence to Inhalers. The questionnaire also included a summary question. We calculated the mean score and the standard deviation for the pre- and postevaluations, compared the mean scores using Student's <i>t-test,</i> and evaluated the relevance of the changes using Cohen's <i>d</i>. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During the 23 meetings held throughout Spain, 267 participants completed the pretraining questionnaire, including 105 primary care physicians, 90 nurses of specialized care, 41 nurses working in primary care, and 31 health care professionals of various origins. Overall, the mean (SD) total score (i.e., number of correct answers out of a maximum of 15; range 0-15) significantly increased from 8.99 (2.26) to 11.46 (2.50) points, for a mean pre-post difference of 2.5 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Notable issues included the misidentification of device types and confusion between inhalation techniques for pressurized metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers. The mean total scores significantly increased across the three main specialties, with large effect sizes in all cases. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our study suggests that both primary care physicians and nurses have relevant gaps in knowledge- and technique-related issues regarding the use of inhalation devices that could be improved using a brief educational intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19412711251380101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aimed to assess the knowledge of health care professionals regarding inhaled therapy devices and techniques and to evaluate the effectiveness of a targeted educational intervention. Methods: An educational program designed to update the knowledge and improve the technical skills of these professionals in the use of different types of inhalers was developed. Before and after each training session, we applied an ad hoc questionnaire that consisted of 15 multiple-choice questions on inhaled therapy grouped into three sections, including knowledge about devices used for inhaled therapy, knowledge about inhaler techniques, and knowledge about adherence to inhaled therapy, as well as the Test of the Adherence to Inhalers. The questionnaire also included a summary question. We calculated the mean score and the standard deviation for the pre- and postevaluations, compared the mean scores using Student's t-test, and evaluated the relevance of the changes using Cohen's d. Results: During the 23 meetings held throughout Spain, 267 participants completed the pretraining questionnaire, including 105 primary care physicians, 90 nurses of specialized care, 41 nurses working in primary care, and 31 health care professionals of various origins. Overall, the mean (SD) total score (i.e., number of correct answers out of a maximum of 15; range 0-15) significantly increased from 8.99 (2.26) to 11.46 (2.50) points, for a mean pre-post difference of 2.5 (p < 0.001). Notable issues included the misidentification of device types and confusion between inhalation techniques for pressurized metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers. The mean total scores significantly increased across the three main specialties, with large effect sizes in all cases. Conclusion: Our study suggests that both primary care physicians and nurses have relevant gaps in knowledge- and technique-related issues regarding the use of inhalation devices that could be improved using a brief educational intervention.

护士和初级保健医生对吸入治疗设备和技术的了解。
背景:我们的目的是评估卫生保健专业人员关于吸入治疗设备和技术的知识,并评估有针对性的教育干预的有效性。方法:制定一项旨在更新这些专业人员使用不同类型吸入器的知识和技术技能的教育计划。在每次培训之前和之后,我们应用了一份特设问卷,该问卷由15个关于吸入治疗的多项选择题组成,分为三个部分,包括关于吸入治疗所用设备的知识,关于吸入器技术的知识,关于吸入治疗依从性的知识,以及对吸入器依从性的测试。问卷还包括一个总结性问题。我们计算了前评估和后评估的平均分和标准差,使用学生t检验比较平均分,并使用Cohen’s d评估变化的相关性。结果:在西班牙各地举行的23次会议中,267名参与者完成了训练前问卷,其中包括105名初级保健医生,90名专科护理护士,41名初级保健护士和31名不同出身的卫生保健专业人员。总体而言,平均(SD)总分(即在最多15个答案中正确答案的数量,范围为0-15)从8.99(2.26)分显著增加到11.46(2.50)分,平均前后差异为2.5分(p < 0.001)。值得注意的问题包括设备类型的错误识别以及加压计量吸入器和干粉吸入器吸入技术之间的混淆。三个主要专业的平均总分显著增加,在所有情况下都有很大的效应量。结论:我们的研究表明,初级保健医生和护士在吸入装置使用的知识和技术相关问题上存在相关差距,可以通过简短的教育干预来改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes: Pulmonary drug delivery Airway reactivity and asthma treatment Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract Toxic effects of inhaled agents Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信