Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Intravenous versus Perineural Dexamethasone Injection Combined with Ropivacaine in Thoracoscopy-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Thoracoscopic Radical Lung Cancer Resection: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ke-Wei Wu, Shu-Yu Deng, Xu-Feng Zhang, Da-Wei Zheng, Li-Hong Hu
{"title":"Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Intravenous versus Perineural Dexamethasone Injection Combined with Ropivacaine in Thoracoscopy-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Thoracoscopic Radical Lung Cancer Resection: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ke-Wei Wu, Shu-Yu Deng, Xu-Feng Zhang, Da-Wei Zheng, Li-Hong Hu","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S532934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As an adjuvant, dexamethasone can enhance the analgesic intensity and prolong the duration of nerve blocks. However, to date, no studies have compared the effectiveness of different administration routes of dexamethasone for thoracoscopy-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TTPB). This prospective randomized controlled study evaluated the postoperative analgesic effects of dexamethasone administered intravenously or perineurally in combination with ropivacaine for TTPB in patients undergoing radical lung cancer resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 150 patients were randomly assigned to receive dexamethasone intravenously (Group I, n=75) or perineurally (Group D, n=75). Before wound closure, patients in Group I underwent TTPB with ropivacaine while receiving an intravenous dexamethasone injection, whereas patients in Group D received a perineural mixture of ropivacaine and dexamethasone. The primary outcome was the time to first postoperative rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, postoperative 48-hour sufentanil consumption in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), postoperative blood glucose levels, postoperative recovery parameters, and incidence of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with Group I, Group D showed a significantly longer time to first postoperative rescue analgesia, lower VAS scores at all assessed time points, and reduced postoperative 48-hour sufentanil consumption. Group D also showed a smaller increase in postoperative blood glucose levels, an earlier time to first ambulation and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). However, the incidence of postoperative nausea was higher in Group D than in Group I (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In TTPB, perineural dexamethasone administration with ropivacaine provided superior and longer-lasting analgesia compared with intravenous administration. Additionally, it accelerated postoperative recovery and shortened hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"8601-8611"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S532934","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: As an adjuvant, dexamethasone can enhance the analgesic intensity and prolong the duration of nerve blocks. However, to date, no studies have compared the effectiveness of different administration routes of dexamethasone for thoracoscopy-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TTPB). This prospective randomized controlled study evaluated the postoperative analgesic effects of dexamethasone administered intravenously or perineurally in combination with ropivacaine for TTPB in patients undergoing radical lung cancer resection.
Methods: A total of 150 patients were randomly assigned to receive dexamethasone intravenously (Group I, n=75) or perineurally (Group D, n=75). Before wound closure, patients in Group I underwent TTPB with ropivacaine while receiving an intravenous dexamethasone injection, whereas patients in Group D received a perineural mixture of ropivacaine and dexamethasone. The primary outcome was the time to first postoperative rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, postoperative 48-hour sufentanil consumption in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), postoperative blood glucose levels, postoperative recovery parameters, and incidence of adverse events.
Results: Compared with Group I, Group D showed a significantly longer time to first postoperative rescue analgesia, lower VAS scores at all assessed time points, and reduced postoperative 48-hour sufentanil consumption. Group D also showed a smaller increase in postoperative blood glucose levels, an earlier time to first ambulation and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (all P < 0.05). However, the incidence of postoperative nausea was higher in Group D than in Group I (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: In TTPB, perineural dexamethasone administration with ropivacaine provided superior and longer-lasting analgesia compared with intravenous administration. Additionally, it accelerated postoperative recovery and shortened hospital stay.
期刊介绍:
Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications.
The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas.
Specific topics covered by the journal include:
Drug target identification and validation
Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution
Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways
New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery*
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes)
Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes
Fragment-based drug discovery
Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology
Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products**
Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development
Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing)
Preclinical development studies
Translational animal models
Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways
Toxicology
Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy
Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics
Clinical drug evaluation
Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.