Cognitive profiles among dementia-free older adults and their associations with neuroimaging markers.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROIMAGING
Alice Hahn, Heather Volk, Corinne Pettigrew, Andreia Faria, Murat Bilgel, Hanzhang Lu, Michael Miller, Marilyn Albert, Anja Soldan
{"title":"Cognitive profiles among dementia-free older adults and their associations with neuroimaging markers.","authors":"Alice Hahn, Heather Volk, Corinne Pettigrew, Andreia Faria, Murat Bilgel, Hanzhang Lu, Michael Miller, Marilyn Albert, Anja Soldan","doi":"10.1007/s11682-025-01051-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior studies have demonstrated the existence of cognitively-defined subgroups among dementia free older adults, however, it is unclear whether such subgroups are characterized by distinct neuroimaging measures of brain function and structure. To address this gap, the current study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify cognitively-defined subgroups in a sample of 167 (mean age = 69 years) dementia-free older adults with cognitive testing, amyloid PET, and multimodal brain MRI scans. The cognitive test scores covered the domains of episodic memory, executive function, language, and visuospatial processing. Linear regression models tested the associations between subgroup membership and neuroimaging measures, adjusting for age, sex, and years of education. Based on the LPA, three cognitive subgroups were identified: (1) high-average cognition (n = 61, 36%), (2) average cognition (n = 88, 53%), and low-average cognition (n = 18, 11%). Compared to the high-average group, the low-average group had lower volumes in cortical regions sensitive to Alzheimer's disease, lower global white matter microstructural integrity measured by diffusion tensor imaging, and higher global white matter hyperintensity burden. There were no group differences in global PET amyloid burden. Additionally, the high-average group tended to have higher resting-state functional connectivity within large-scale cognitive networks than the other two groups. These results suggest that cognitively-defined subgroups among older adults without dementia are associated with several measures of brain structure and function. Evaluating brain structure/function differences among dementia-free older adults may help identify individuals at greatest risk for future cognitive decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":9192,"journal":{"name":"Brain Imaging and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Imaging and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-025-01051-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior studies have demonstrated the existence of cognitively-defined subgroups among dementia free older adults, however, it is unclear whether such subgroups are characterized by distinct neuroimaging measures of brain function and structure. To address this gap, the current study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify cognitively-defined subgroups in a sample of 167 (mean age = 69 years) dementia-free older adults with cognitive testing, amyloid PET, and multimodal brain MRI scans. The cognitive test scores covered the domains of episodic memory, executive function, language, and visuospatial processing. Linear regression models tested the associations between subgroup membership and neuroimaging measures, adjusting for age, sex, and years of education. Based on the LPA, three cognitive subgroups were identified: (1) high-average cognition (n = 61, 36%), (2) average cognition (n = 88, 53%), and low-average cognition (n = 18, 11%). Compared to the high-average group, the low-average group had lower volumes in cortical regions sensitive to Alzheimer's disease, lower global white matter microstructural integrity measured by diffusion tensor imaging, and higher global white matter hyperintensity burden. There were no group differences in global PET amyloid burden. Additionally, the high-average group tended to have higher resting-state functional connectivity within large-scale cognitive networks than the other two groups. These results suggest that cognitively-defined subgroups among older adults without dementia are associated with several measures of brain structure and function. Evaluating brain structure/function differences among dementia-free older adults may help identify individuals at greatest risk for future cognitive decline.

无痴呆老年人的认知特征及其与神经影像学标志物的关系
先前的研究已经证明在无痴呆的老年人中存在认知定义的亚组,然而,尚不清楚这些亚组是否具有不同的脑功能和结构的神经影像学测量特征。为了解决这一差距,目前的研究使用了潜在谱分析(LPA),通过认知测试、淀粉样蛋白PET和多模态脑MRI扫描,在167名(平均年龄= 69岁)无痴呆的老年人样本中识别认知定义的亚组。认知测试成绩包括情景记忆、执行功能、语言和视觉空间处理。线性回归模型测试了亚组成员和神经影像学测量之间的关系,调整了年龄、性别和受教育年限。在LPA的基础上,分为3个认知亚组:(1)高平均认知(n = 61, 36%),(2)平均认知(n = 88, 53%)和低平均认知(n = 18, 11%)。与高平均组相比,低平均组对阿尔茨海默病敏感的皮质区域体积更小,弥散张量成像测量的全脑白质微结构完整性更低,全脑白质高负荷更高。在全球PET淀粉样蛋白负荷方面没有组间差异。此外,与其他两组相比,高平均组在大尺度认知网络中具有更高的静息状态功能连通性。这些结果表明,在没有痴呆症的老年人中,认知定义的亚群与大脑结构和功能的几种测量方法有关。评估无痴呆症老年人的大脑结构/功能差异可能有助于识别未来认知能力下降风险最大的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Imaging and Behavior
Brain Imaging and Behavior 医学-神经成像
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Brain Imaging and Behavior is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed journal, that publishes clinically relevant research using neuroimaging approaches to enhance our understanding of disorders of higher brain function. The journal is targeted at clinicians and researchers in fields concerned with human brain-behavior relationships, such as neuropsychology, psychiatry, neurology, neurosurgery, rehabilitation, and cognitive neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信