Michelle C Coughlin, Elika Ridelman, Lydia J Donoghue, Christina M Shanti
{"title":"Factors Associated With Exceeding Predicted Hospital Stays in Pediatric Trauma Patients.","authors":"Michelle C Coughlin, Elika Ridelman, Lydia J Donoghue, Christina M Shanti","doi":"10.1177/00099228251376861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) calculates predicted length of stay (LOS) for specific diagnosis-related groups and ties it to reimbursement. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the presence of non-accidental trauma (NAT) have been associated with longer hospital stays in pediatric trauma patients. To what extent do those and other factors in the pediatric trauma patient impact the CMS-predicted LOS is unknown. This study aims to identify factors in our patients where practice change may reduce LOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted of 1005 pediatric trauma patients admitted to our urban, academic Level 1 Trauma Center from January 2018 to December 2020, who met inclusion criteria. Patient data were analyzed with a significance given of <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 177 (17.6%) patients exceeded their CMS-predicted LOS. These patients had greater admissions to the ICU (56.1% vs 13.8%; <i>P</i> = .000), confirmed-NAT (11.6% vs 3.3%; <i>P</i> = .000), child protective service involvement (33.1% vs 21.3%; <i>P</i> = .001), intubations (36.0% vs 5.4%; <i>P</i> = .000), ventilator days (3.66 vs 0.23; <i>P</i> = . 000), transfusions (26.7% vs 3.0%; <i>P</i> = .000), and discharges to inpatient rehab (21.5% vs 1.6%; <i>P</i> = .000). They presented with a higher ISS (16.0 vs 7.0; <i>P</i> = .000). Etiologies associated with excessive LOS included motor-vehicle-crashes (22.1% vs 12.9%; <i>P</i> = .001), motor-vehicle vs pedestrian (10.5% vs 6.5%; <i>P</i> = .032), and suspected abuse (14% vs 5.1%; <i>P</i> = .000). Patients with excessive LOS had a higher likelihood of brain injury (48.8% vs 21.3%; <i>P</i> = .000) and internal organ injury (22.7% vs 6.9%; <i>P</i> = .000). They had more imaging studies (2.01 vs 1.51; <i>P</i> = .000), including more CT (68.6% vs 49.3%), MRI (22.7% vs 6.8%), and ultrasound (37.2% vs 22.6%) use. Patients who exceeded LOS underwent more surgical procedures (1.2 vs 0.6; <i>P</i> = .000), with a longer time from admission to operating room (1.92 vs 0.76 days; <i>P</i> = .001) and longer operative times (113.1 vs 40.0 minutes; <i>P</i> = .000). They more frequently required intervention by general surgery (5.8% vs 2.1%), neurosurgery (16.9% vs 1.6%), or multiple surgical teams (15.1% vs 3.7%). They had lower rates of intervention by other surgical subspecialties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A proportion of admitted pediatric trauma patients exceeded their CMS-predicted LOS, influencing hospital reimbursement. Our study identifies factors associated with excessive LOS related to patient demographics, trauma etiologies, and inpatient courses. These factors, particularly concerning patient care, should be considered to improve LOS predictions and to reduce actual LOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10363,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"99228251376861"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00099228251376861","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) calculates predicted length of stay (LOS) for specific diagnosis-related groups and ties it to reimbursement. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the presence of non-accidental trauma (NAT) have been associated with longer hospital stays in pediatric trauma patients. To what extent do those and other factors in the pediatric trauma patient impact the CMS-predicted LOS is unknown. This study aims to identify factors in our patients where practice change may reduce LOS.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 1005 pediatric trauma patients admitted to our urban, academic Level 1 Trauma Center from January 2018 to December 2020, who met inclusion criteria. Patient data were analyzed with a significance given of P < .05.
Results: A total of 177 (17.6%) patients exceeded their CMS-predicted LOS. These patients had greater admissions to the ICU (56.1% vs 13.8%; P = .000), confirmed-NAT (11.6% vs 3.3%; P = .000), child protective service involvement (33.1% vs 21.3%; P = .001), intubations (36.0% vs 5.4%; P = .000), ventilator days (3.66 vs 0.23; P = . 000), transfusions (26.7% vs 3.0%; P = .000), and discharges to inpatient rehab (21.5% vs 1.6%; P = .000). They presented with a higher ISS (16.0 vs 7.0; P = .000). Etiologies associated with excessive LOS included motor-vehicle-crashes (22.1% vs 12.9%; P = .001), motor-vehicle vs pedestrian (10.5% vs 6.5%; P = .032), and suspected abuse (14% vs 5.1%; P = .000). Patients with excessive LOS had a higher likelihood of brain injury (48.8% vs 21.3%; P = .000) and internal organ injury (22.7% vs 6.9%; P = .000). They had more imaging studies (2.01 vs 1.51; P = .000), including more CT (68.6% vs 49.3%), MRI (22.7% vs 6.8%), and ultrasound (37.2% vs 22.6%) use. Patients who exceeded LOS underwent more surgical procedures (1.2 vs 0.6; P = .000), with a longer time from admission to operating room (1.92 vs 0.76 days; P = .001) and longer operative times (113.1 vs 40.0 minutes; P = .000). They more frequently required intervention by general surgery (5.8% vs 2.1%), neurosurgery (16.9% vs 1.6%), or multiple surgical teams (15.1% vs 3.7%). They had lower rates of intervention by other surgical subspecialties.
Conclusions: A proportion of admitted pediatric trauma patients exceeded their CMS-predicted LOS, influencing hospital reimbursement. Our study identifies factors associated with excessive LOS related to patient demographics, trauma etiologies, and inpatient courses. These factors, particularly concerning patient care, should be considered to improve LOS predictions and to reduce actual LOS.
背景:医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)计算特定诊断相关群体的预计住院时间(LOS),并将其与报销联系起来。损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和非意外创伤(NAT)的存在与儿科创伤患者住院时间较长有关。在何种程度上这些和其他因素在儿童创伤患者影响cms预测的LOS是未知的。本研究的目的是确定我们的病人的因素,其中实践改变可能会降低LOS。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年12月在我市学术一级创伤中心收治的1005例符合纳入标准的儿童创伤患者。对患者资料进行分析,P < 0.05。结果:共有177例(17.6%)患者超过了cms预测的LOS。这些患者的ICU入院率更高(56.1%比13.8%,P = 0.000),确诊的nat(11.6%比3.3%,P = 0.000),儿童保护服务参与(33.1%比21.3%,P = 0.001),插管(36.0%比5.4%,P = 0.000),呼吸机天数(3.66比0.23,P = 0.000)。输血(26.7% vs 3.0%, P = 0.000)和住院康复出院(21.5% vs 1.6%, P = 0.000)。他们表现出更高的ISS (16.0 vs 7.0; P = 0.000)。与过度LOS相关的病因包括机动车碰撞(22.1%对12.9%,P = 0.001)、机动车对行人(10.5%对6.5%,P = 0.032)和疑似虐待(14%对5.1%,P = 0.000)。过度LOS患者发生脑损伤(48.8% vs 21.3%, P = 0.000)和内脏器官损伤(22.7% vs 6.9%, P = 0.000)的可能性更高。他们有更多的影像学检查(2.01 vs 1.51; P = .000),包括更多的CT (68.6% vs 49.3%), MRI (22.7% vs 6.8%)和超声(37.2% vs 22.6%)使用。超过LOS的患者手术次数较多(1.2 vs 0.6, P = .000),从入院到手术室的时间较长(1.92 vs 0.76天,P = .001),手术时间较长(113.1 vs 40.0分钟,P = .000)。他们更频繁地需要普通外科(5.8%对2.1%)、神经外科(16.9%对1.6%)或多个外科团队(15.1%对3.7%)的干预。其他外科专科的干预率较低。结论:住院儿童创伤患者的比例超过了cms预测的LOS,影响了医院报销。我们的研究确定了与患者人口统计学、创伤病因和住院病程相关的过度LOS相关因素。应该考虑这些因素,特别是与患者护理有关的因素,以改善LOS预测并减少实际LOS。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Pediatrics (CLP) a peer-reviewed monthly journal, is a must read for the busy pediatrician. CLP contains state-of-the-art, accurate, concise and down-to earth information on practical, everyday child care topics whether they are clinical, scientific, behavioral, educational, or ethical.