Implementation and challenges of prehabilitation in gastrointestinal oncology: a national cross-sectional survey in France.

IF 2.6 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Eva Ester Molina Beltran, Nora Dollet Nedellec, Marc Hilmi, Matthieu Delaye, Bruno Raynard, Sandrine Hiret, Damien Vansteene, Florence Carrouel, Claude Dussart, Cindy Neuzillet
{"title":"Implementation and challenges of prehabilitation in gastrointestinal oncology: a national cross-sectional survey in France.","authors":"Eva Ester Molina Beltran, Nora Dollet Nedellec, Marc Hilmi, Matthieu Delaye, Bruno Raynard, Sandrine Hiret, Damien Vansteene, Florence Carrouel, Claude Dussart, Cindy Neuzillet","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.09.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the implementation, structure, and challenges of multimodal prehabilitation programs in gastrointestinal (GI) oncology across France, in a context where evidence supports its benefits but national standardization is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national cross-sectional survey was conducted from April to July 2024. The 54-item questionnaire, developed by a multidisciplinary group, assessed team demographics, patient selection, intervention modalities, pathway coordination, and barriers to implementation. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 92 respondent teams, 19 (20.7%) reported having a structured prehabilitation pathway. Most included nutritional (94.7%) and physical activity (74%) interventions, while only 5.3% provided systematic psychological support. Program eligibility was generally based on nutritional risk, surgical magnitude, and patient frailty, but varied widely. Prehabilitation was most often coordinated by surgeons (40%) and dietitians (78.9%), and typically delivered in day-hospital settings. Key challenges included insufficient human resources (60%), coordination issues (49%), and funding limitations (35%). Despite these barriers, perceived utility and satisfaction with prehabilitation programs were high (median scores of 8/10 and 8.6/10, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prehabilitation in GI oncology is emerging but remains inconsistently applied across France. To scale these interventions equitably and effectively, national guidelines, enhanced coordination and institutional support are essential. Integration with existing perioperative pathways like ERAS and increased psychological support are also needed to improve patient outcomes. Only one center in our sample offered systematic psychological support.</p>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.09.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the implementation, structure, and challenges of multimodal prehabilitation programs in gastrointestinal (GI) oncology across France, in a context where evidence supports its benefits but national standardization is lacking.

Methods: A national cross-sectional survey was conducted from April to July 2024. The 54-item questionnaire, developed by a multidisciplinary group, assessed team demographics, patient selection, intervention modalities, pathway coordination, and barriers to implementation. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.

Results: Among 92 respondent teams, 19 (20.7%) reported having a structured prehabilitation pathway. Most included nutritional (94.7%) and physical activity (74%) interventions, while only 5.3% provided systematic psychological support. Program eligibility was generally based on nutritional risk, surgical magnitude, and patient frailty, but varied widely. Prehabilitation was most often coordinated by surgeons (40%) and dietitians (78.9%), and typically delivered in day-hospital settings. Key challenges included insufficient human resources (60%), coordination issues (49%), and funding limitations (35%). Despite these barriers, perceived utility and satisfaction with prehabilitation programs were high (median scores of 8/10 and 8.6/10, respectively).

Conclusion: Prehabilitation in GI oncology is emerging but remains inconsistently applied across France. To scale these interventions equitably and effectively, national guidelines, enhanced coordination and institutional support are essential. Integration with existing perioperative pathways like ERAS and increased psychological support are also needed to improve patient outcomes. Only one center in our sample offered systematic psychological support.

胃肠肿瘤学康复的实施和挑战:法国全国横断面调查。
目的:在证据支持其益处但缺乏国家标准化的背景下,探讨法国胃肠道(GI)肿瘤学多模式康复计划的实施、结构和挑战。方法:于2024年4 - 7月在全国范围内进行横断面调查。这份54项问卷由一个多学科小组编制,评估了团队人口统计、患者选择、干预方式、途径协调和实施障碍。采用描述性统计进行数据分析。结果:在92个受访团队中,19个(20.7%)报告有结构化的康复途径。大多数包括营养(94.7%)和身体活动(74%)干预,而只有5.3%提供系统的心理支持。项目资格通常基于营养风险、手术规模和患者虚弱程度,但差异很大。预康复通常由外科医生(40%)和营养师(78.9%)协调,通常在日间医院进行。主要挑战包括人力资源不足(60%)、协调问题(49%)和资金限制(35%)。尽管存在这些障碍,但对康复项目的感知效用和满意度很高(中位数分别为8/10和8.6/10)。结论:胃肠肿瘤学的预康复正在兴起,但在法国仍不一致。为了公平有效地扩大这些干预措施的规模,国家准则、加强协调和机构支持至关重要。还需要与现有的围手术期途径(如ERAS)相结合并增加心理支持,以改善患者的预后。在我们的样本中,只有一个中心提供系统的心理支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition ESPEN
Clinical nutrition ESPEN NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
512
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信