Comparison of different machine learning techniques for downscaling SMAP and NLDAS soil moisture over CONUS.

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Eshita A Eva, Steven M Quiring
{"title":"Comparison of different machine learning techniques for downscaling SMAP and NLDAS soil moisture over CONUS.","authors":"Eshita A Eva, Steven M Quiring","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although many soil moisture products are available, they do not have a high enough spatial resolution for many applications. For example, soil moisture for agriculture applications is best at sub-field scale resolution. The goal of this study is to identify the best approach for downscaling 1-km soil moisture. Two distinct sources of soil moisture data and two units of soil moisture (volumetric water content (VWC) and percentiles (a standard form of soil moisture value for different purpose)) were utilized: satellite-derived soil moisture from NASA's Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission (2015-2021) and model-based soil moisture from the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) (2001-2021). Three machine learning techniques were applied to generate higher resolution soil moisture over CONUS: random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were generated to determine which features are most important for downscaling soil moisture. This study found that RF had the best performance for downscaling volumetric water content (VWC) (MAE for SMAP = 0.0816; MAE for NLDAS = 0.0828) and soil moisture percentiles (MAE for SMAP = 0.217; MAE for NLDAS = 0.226). XGB also had good accuracy. The difference in accuracy between RF and XGB is negligible, and XGB was faster to run. This makes it a good choice for downscaling soil moisture. SVM had larger errors for downscaling VWC, and it was slower to run. Elevation and precipitation are the most influential features in the RF downscaling of SMAP and NLDAS soil moisture. Dew point temperature, antecedent precipitation index, elevation, and maximum temperature are the most influential features in the XGB downscaling of SMAP and NLDAS soil moisture.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"394 ","pages":"127442"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although many soil moisture products are available, they do not have a high enough spatial resolution for many applications. For example, soil moisture for agriculture applications is best at sub-field scale resolution. The goal of this study is to identify the best approach for downscaling 1-km soil moisture. Two distinct sources of soil moisture data and two units of soil moisture (volumetric water content (VWC) and percentiles (a standard form of soil moisture value for different purpose)) were utilized: satellite-derived soil moisture from NASA's Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission (2015-2021) and model-based soil moisture from the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) (2001-2021). Three machine learning techniques were applied to generate higher resolution soil moisture over CONUS: random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were generated to determine which features are most important for downscaling soil moisture. This study found that RF had the best performance for downscaling volumetric water content (VWC) (MAE for SMAP = 0.0816; MAE for NLDAS = 0.0828) and soil moisture percentiles (MAE for SMAP = 0.217; MAE for NLDAS = 0.226). XGB also had good accuracy. The difference in accuracy between RF and XGB is negligible, and XGB was faster to run. This makes it a good choice for downscaling soil moisture. SVM had larger errors for downscaling VWC, and it was slower to run. Elevation and precipitation are the most influential features in the RF downscaling of SMAP and NLDAS soil moisture. Dew point temperature, antecedent precipitation index, elevation, and maximum temperature are the most influential features in the XGB downscaling of SMAP and NLDAS soil moisture.

不同机器学习技术对CONUS地区SMAP和NLDAS土壤湿度降尺度的比较
虽然有许多土壤湿度产品可用,但它们在许多应用中没有足够高的空间分辨率。例如,用于农业的土壤湿度在分田尺度分辨率下是最好的。本研究的目的是确定降低1公里土壤湿度的最佳方法。使用了两个不同的土壤水分数据来源和两个土壤水分单位(体积含水量(VWC)和百分位数(用于不同目的的土壤水分标准形式)):来自NASA土壤水分主被动(SMAP)任务(2015-2021)的卫星土壤水分,以及来自北美土地数据同化系统(NLDAS)(2001-2021)的基于模型的土壤水分。采用随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)和极端梯度增强(XGB)三种机器学习技术在CONUS上生成更高分辨率的土壤湿度。生成SHapley加性解释(SHAP)值,以确定哪些特征对土壤湿度降尺度最为重要。研究发现,RF对体积含水量(VWC) (SMAP的MAE = 0.0816; NLDAS的MAE = 0.0828)和土壤水分百分位数(SMAP的MAE = 0.217; NLDAS的MAE = 0.226)的降尺度效果最好。XGB也有很好的准确性。RF和XGB之间的精度差异可以忽略不计,XGB运行起来更快。这使它成为降低土壤湿度的一个很好的选择。SVM对VWC的降尺度误差较大,运行速度较慢。海拔和降水是影响SMAP和NLDAS土壤湿度RF降尺度的最主要特征。露点温度、前降水指数、高程和最高温度是影响SMAP和NLDAS土壤湿度XGB降尺度的主要特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信