Strategic design principles for greener biorefineries: a substrate–process matrix emphasizing complete lignocellulose utilization from various biomass feedstocks

IF 9.2 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Green Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-08-23 DOI:10.1039/D5GC02627J
Jianyu Guan, Aamir Khan, Yi Zhang, Yixing Zhou, Molly Meng-Jung Li, Raffel Dharma Patria and Shao-Yuan Leu
{"title":"Strategic design principles for greener biorefineries: a substrate–process matrix emphasizing complete lignocellulose utilization from various biomass feedstocks","authors":"Jianyu Guan, Aamir Khan, Yi Zhang, Yixing Zhou, Molly Meng-Jung Li, Raffel Dharma Patria and Shao-Yuan Leu","doi":"10.1039/D5GC02627J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Lignocellulosic biomass are promising feedstocks for sustainable biofuel and bioproduct production. Despite their abundance, however, only a fraction of biomass is utilized, highlighting their complex compositions and the need for advanced biorefinery technologies. This study investigates two biorefinery strategies, <em>i.e.</em>, pretreatment followed by catalytic transfer hydrogenolysis (PT-CTH) and reductive catalytic fractionation (RCF), aiming to harvest high-value lignin monomers from diverse biomass feedstocks including hardwood, softwood, grasses, barks, and seed coats. We classify these biomass feedstocks based on their lignin structures and physiochemical properties, which influence their reactivity and suitability for specific treatment processes. Through analyses on mass balance, environmental sustainability, and economic profitability, we propose recommendations and suggest future research directions to improve current processes for each biomass species. Our analysis reveals that while RCF converts lignin to higher monomer yields and exhibits higher economic feasibility, PT-CTH is more sustainable and utilizes the whole biomass more efficiently due to its efficient pretreatment. Hardwood and grass demonstrate high resource efficiency, with higher yields of monomers in RCF; softwood and barks are preferred feedstocks for PT due to higher extractive contents and carbohydrates compositions. Seed coats, rich in C-lignin, offer high potential for aromatic monomer production, but demonstrate lower resource efficiency while barks require tailored approaches due to their complex lignin units. This study proposes recommendations to advance efficient, sustainable biorefinery operations, exploiting the structural diversity of different biomass for optimized biomass utilization, and supports the development of more economical and environmentally friendly biorefinery techniques toward carbon neutrality.</p>","PeriodicalId":78,"journal":{"name":"Green Chemistry","volume":" 38","pages":" 11581-11606"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d5gc02627j","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lignocellulosic biomass are promising feedstocks for sustainable biofuel and bioproduct production. Despite their abundance, however, only a fraction of biomass is utilized, highlighting their complex compositions and the need for advanced biorefinery technologies. This study investigates two biorefinery strategies, i.e., pretreatment followed by catalytic transfer hydrogenolysis (PT-CTH) and reductive catalytic fractionation (RCF), aiming to harvest high-value lignin monomers from diverse biomass feedstocks including hardwood, softwood, grasses, barks, and seed coats. We classify these biomass feedstocks based on their lignin structures and physiochemical properties, which influence their reactivity and suitability for specific treatment processes. Through analyses on mass balance, environmental sustainability, and economic profitability, we propose recommendations and suggest future research directions to improve current processes for each biomass species. Our analysis reveals that while RCF converts lignin to higher monomer yields and exhibits higher economic feasibility, PT-CTH is more sustainable and utilizes the whole biomass more efficiently due to its efficient pretreatment. Hardwood and grass demonstrate high resource efficiency, with higher yields of monomers in RCF; softwood and barks are preferred feedstocks for PT due to higher extractive contents and carbohydrates compositions. Seed coats, rich in C-lignin, offer high potential for aromatic monomer production, but demonstrate lower resource efficiency while barks require tailored approaches due to their complex lignin units. This study proposes recommendations to advance efficient, sustainable biorefinery operations, exploiting the structural diversity of different biomass for optimized biomass utilization, and supports the development of more economical and environmentally friendly biorefinery techniques toward carbon neutrality.

Abstract Image

绿色生物精炼厂的战略设计原则:强调从各种生物质原料中完全利用木质纤维素的基质-工艺矩阵
木质纤维素生物质是可持续生物燃料和生物产品生产的有前途的原料。然而,尽管它们储量丰富,但只有一小部分生物质得到利用,这突出了它们复杂的成分和对先进生物炼制技术的需求。本研究研究了两种生物精炼策略,即预处理后的催化转移氢解(PT-CTH)和还原催化分馏(RCF),旨在从包括硬木、软木、草、树皮和种皮在内的多种生物质原料中获得高价值的木质素单体。我们根据它们的木质素结构和理化性质对这些生物质原料进行分类,这些特性会影响它们的反应性和对特定处理过程的适用性。通过对各生物质物种的质量平衡、环境可持续性和经济盈利能力的分析,提出了改进现有过程的建议和未来的研究方向。我们的分析表明,虽然RCF将木质素转化为更高的单体产量并且具有更高的经济可行性,但PT-CTH由于其高效的预处理而更具可持续性并更有效地利用整个生物质。硬木和草木表现出较高的资源效率,在RCF中单体产量较高;由于较高的提取物含量和碳水化合物组成,软木和树皮是PT的首选原料。种皮富含c -木质素,为芳香单体的生产提供了很大的潜力,但由于其复杂的木质素单元,树皮的资源效率较低,需要量身定制的方法。本研究提出了促进高效、可持续生物炼制操作的建议,利用不同生物质的结构多样性来优化生物质利用,并支持开发更经济、更环保的生物炼制技术,以实现碳中和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
677
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Green Chemistry is a journal that provides a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative green and sustainable technologies. The scope of Green Chemistry is based on the definition proposed by Anastas and Warner (Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, P T Anastas and J C Warner, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998), which defines green chemistry as the utilisation of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products. Green Chemistry aims to reduce the environmental impact of the chemical enterprise by developing a technology base that is inherently non-toxic to living things and the environment. The journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of research relating to this endeavor and publishes original and significant cutting-edge research that is likely to be of wide general appeal. For a work to be published, it must present a significant advance in green chemistry, including a comparison with existing methods and a demonstration of advantages over those methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信