Advancing deep learning for automated stroke detection: a review

IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Selorm Adablanu , Utpal Barman , Dulumani Das
{"title":"Advancing deep learning for automated stroke detection: a review","authors":"Selorm Adablanu ,&nbsp;Utpal Barman ,&nbsp;Dulumani Das","doi":"10.1016/j.hest.2025.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Stroke remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, necessitating improved diagnostic tools for early detection and classification. Machine learning (ML) techniques have shown promise in addressing this critical healthcare challenge by enabling efficient analysis of stroke-related data. However, the lack of standardized datasets, limited real-time clinical applicability, and the complexity of model interpretability hinder broader adoption. This review critically examines 34 research articles published between 2014 and 2025, focusing on traditional ML, deep learning, transfer learning, and hybrid approaches for stroke detection and classification. Key findings highlight that Traditional ML models such as Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Random Forests (RF) have been widely used but show limitations in high-dimensional medical imaging tasks. Conversely, advanced deep learning models, such as EEG-DenseNet and ResNet50, excel in stroke segmentation and classification tasks, while hybrid methods demonstrate potential for improving accuracy through ensemble strategies. The review also underscores the challenges of dataset scarcity, ethical concerns, and integration barriers in clinical settings. Recommendations for future research include developing more representative datasets, advancing explainable AI methods, and exploring real-time implementation frameworks to bridge the gap between research and clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33969,"journal":{"name":"Brain Hemorrhages","volume":"6 5","pages":"Pages 247-260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Hemorrhages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589238X25000531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stroke remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, necessitating improved diagnostic tools for early detection and classification. Machine learning (ML) techniques have shown promise in addressing this critical healthcare challenge by enabling efficient analysis of stroke-related data. However, the lack of standardized datasets, limited real-time clinical applicability, and the complexity of model interpretability hinder broader adoption. This review critically examines 34 research articles published between 2014 and 2025, focusing on traditional ML, deep learning, transfer learning, and hybrid approaches for stroke detection and classification. Key findings highlight that Traditional ML models such as Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Random Forests (RF) have been widely used but show limitations in high-dimensional medical imaging tasks. Conversely, advanced deep learning models, such as EEG-DenseNet and ResNet50, excel in stroke segmentation and classification tasks, while hybrid methods demonstrate potential for improving accuracy through ensemble strategies. The review also underscores the challenges of dataset scarcity, ethical concerns, and integration barriers in clinical settings. Recommendations for future research include developing more representative datasets, advancing explainable AI methods, and exploring real-time implementation frameworks to bridge the gap between research and clinical practice.
推进深度学习用于自动中风检测:综述
中风仍然是世界范围内死亡和残疾的主要原因,需要改进诊断工具以进行早期发现和分类。机器学习(ML)技术通过实现对中风相关数据的有效分析,在解决这一关键的医疗挑战方面显示出了希望。然而,缺乏标准化的数据集、有限的实时临床适用性以及模型可解释性的复杂性阻碍了模型的广泛采用。本综述对2014年至2025年间发表的34篇研究文章进行了批判性研究,重点关注传统机器学习、深度学习、迁移学习以及脑卒中检测和分类的混合方法。主要发现强调了传统的机器学习模型,如支持向量机(SVM)和随机森林(RF)已被广泛使用,但在高维医学成像任务中显示出局限性。相反,先进的深度学习模型,如EEG-DenseNet和ResNet50,在脑卒中分割和分类任务方面表现出色,而混合方法则显示出通过集成策略提高准确性的潜力。该综述还强调了数据集稀缺、伦理问题和临床环境整合障碍的挑战。对未来研究的建议包括开发更具代表性的数据集,推进可解释的人工智能方法,以及探索实时实施框架,以弥合研究与临床实践之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Hemorrhages
Brain Hemorrhages Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
22 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信