R. Maarleveld , H.E.J. Veeger , F.C.T. van der Helm , J. Son , R.L. Lieber , E. van der Kruk
{"title":"What the PCSA? Addressing diversity in lower-limb musculoskeletal models: age- and sex-related differences in PCSA and muscle mass","authors":"R. Maarleveld , H.E.J. Veeger , F.C.T. van der Helm , J. Son , R.L. Lieber , E. van der Kruk","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Musculoskeletal (MSK) models offer a non-invasive way to understand biomechanical loads on joints and tendons, which are difficult to measure directly. Variations in muscle strength, especially relative differences between muscles, significantly impact model outcomes. Typically, scaled generic MSK models use maximum isometric forces that are not adjusted for different demographics, raising concerns about their accuracy. This review provides an overview on experimentally derived strength parameters, including physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA), muscle mass (Mm), and relative muscle mass (%Mm), which is the relative distribution of muscle mass across the leg. Limited lower extremity PCSA data prevented assessment of differences in PCSA distribution. We analysed differences by age and sex, and compared open-source lower limb MSK model parameters with experimental data from 57 studies. Our dataset, with records dating back to 1884, shows that uniformly increasing all maximum isometric forces in MSK models does not capture key age-and sex-related differences in muscle ratio. Males have a significantly higher proportion of muscle mass in the rectus femoris(12%) and semimembranosus(15%) muscles, while females have a greater relative muscle mass in the pelvic (gluteus maximus(17%) and medius(23%)) and ankle muscles (tibialis anterior(14%) and posterior(15%), and extensor digitorum longus(16%)). Older adults have a higher relative muscle mass in the gluteus medius(37%), while younger individuals show more in the gastrocnemius(31%). Current MSK models do not accurately represent muscle mass distribution for specific age or sex groups. None of them accurately reflect female muscle mass distribution. Further research is needed to explore musculotendon age- and sex differences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 112976"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Musculoskeletal (MSK) models offer a non-invasive way to understand biomechanical loads on joints and tendons, which are difficult to measure directly. Variations in muscle strength, especially relative differences between muscles, significantly impact model outcomes. Typically, scaled generic MSK models use maximum isometric forces that are not adjusted for different demographics, raising concerns about their accuracy. This review provides an overview on experimentally derived strength parameters, including physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA), muscle mass (Mm), and relative muscle mass (%Mm), which is the relative distribution of muscle mass across the leg. Limited lower extremity PCSA data prevented assessment of differences in PCSA distribution. We analysed differences by age and sex, and compared open-source lower limb MSK model parameters with experimental data from 57 studies. Our dataset, with records dating back to 1884, shows that uniformly increasing all maximum isometric forces in MSK models does not capture key age-and sex-related differences in muscle ratio. Males have a significantly higher proportion of muscle mass in the rectus femoris(12%) and semimembranosus(15%) muscles, while females have a greater relative muscle mass in the pelvic (gluteus maximus(17%) and medius(23%)) and ankle muscles (tibialis anterior(14%) and posterior(15%), and extensor digitorum longus(16%)). Older adults have a higher relative muscle mass in the gluteus medius(37%), while younger individuals show more in the gastrocnemius(31%). Current MSK models do not accurately represent muscle mass distribution for specific age or sex groups. None of them accurately reflect female muscle mass distribution. Further research is needed to explore musculotendon age- and sex differences.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.