Qian Jiang, Naifang Bei, Yutian Zhang, Jiarui Wu, Ruonan Wang, Jiaoyang Yu, Yuxuan Lu, Qian Li, Lang Liu, Guohui Li
{"title":"Health risk assessment of NO2 exposure on respiratory outpatient visits in the North China Plain during wintertime","authors":"Qian Jiang, Naifang Bei, Yutian Zhang, Jiarui Wu, Ruonan Wang, Jiaoyang Yu, Yuxuan Lu, Qian Li, Lang Liu, Guohui Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) exposure has rarely been explored with respiratory outpatient visits in China. The Generalized Additive Model (GAM) is first employed to assess health related risk (RR) with NO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure in Tianjin during the winter of 2019/2020. The RR of NO<sub>2</sub> exposure is 1.018 (95% CI: 1.012-1.024) on lag 3 days, while that of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) exposure is 1.005 (95% CI: 1.002-1.008) on lag 4 days per 10<!-- --> <!-- -->μg<!-- --> <!-- -->m<sup>-3</sup>. The Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled to Chemistry (WRF-Chem) model is used to simulate the pollutant concentrations to calculate the total number of excess visits (EN) in the North China Plain (NCP) in the 2019/2020 winter. The EN of NO<sub>2</sub> exposure is 0.97 million (95% CI: 0.67, 1.27), while for PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure is 1.19 million (95% CI: 0.50, 1.84). With the anthropogenic emission mitigation, the PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration has dropped by 40.3<!-- --> <!-- -->μg<!-- --> <!-- -->m<sup>-3</sup> on average in the NCP, but the NO<sub>2</sub> concentration has rebounded by 1.8<!-- --> <!-- -->μg<!-- --> <!-- -->m<sup>-3</sup>. The emissions mitigation reduces NO<sub>2</sub>-related EN by 0.76 million (95% CI: 0.53–0.98) and PM<sub>2.5</sub>-related EN by 1.11 million (95% CI: 0.48–1.69). The findings underscore that reducing NO<sub>2</sub> emissions could yield more substantial health benefits.","PeriodicalId":361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139997","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) exposure has rarely been explored with respiratory outpatient visits in China. The Generalized Additive Model (GAM) is first employed to assess health related risk (RR) with NO2 and PM2.5 exposure in Tianjin during the winter of 2019/2020. The RR of NO2 exposure is 1.018 (95% CI: 1.012-1.024) on lag 3 days, while that of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure is 1.005 (95% CI: 1.002-1.008) on lag 4 days per 10 μg m-3. The Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled to Chemistry (WRF-Chem) model is used to simulate the pollutant concentrations to calculate the total number of excess visits (EN) in the North China Plain (NCP) in the 2019/2020 winter. The EN of NO2 exposure is 0.97 million (95% CI: 0.67, 1.27), while for PM2.5 exposure is 1.19 million (95% CI: 0.50, 1.84). With the anthropogenic emission mitigation, the PM2.5 concentration has dropped by 40.3 μg m-3 on average in the NCP, but the NO2 concentration has rebounded by 1.8 μg m-3. The emissions mitigation reduces NO2-related EN by 0.76 million (95% CI: 0.53–0.98) and PM2.5-related EN by 1.11 million (95% CI: 0.48–1.69). The findings underscore that reducing NO2 emissions could yield more substantial health benefits.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hazardous Materials serves as a global platform for promoting cutting-edge research in the field of Environmental Science and Engineering. Our publication features a wide range of articles, including full-length research papers, review articles, and perspectives, with the aim of enhancing our understanding of the dangers and risks associated with various materials concerning public health and the environment. It is important to note that the term "environmental contaminants" refers specifically to substances that pose hazardous effects through contamination, while excluding those that do not have such impacts on the environment or human health. Moreover, we emphasize the distinction between wastes and hazardous materials in order to provide further clarity on the scope of the journal. We have a keen interest in exploring specific compounds and microbial agents that have adverse effects on the environment.