Development and Validation of the Mobility in Middle-Age Questionnaire (MMQ).

Roee Hayek,Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez,Jonathan F Bean,Jack M Guralnik,Kenneth Covinsky,Jay R Hoffman,Michal Azmon,Galit Yogev-Seligmann,Gregory Krautner,Odelyah Saad,Yaniv Nudelman,Rebecca T Brown,Shmuel Springer
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Mobility in Middle-Age Questionnaire (MMQ).","authors":"Roee Hayek,Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez,Jonathan F Bean,Jack M Guralnik,Kenneth Covinsky,Jay R Hoffman,Michal Azmon,Galit Yogev-Seligmann,Gregory Krautner,Odelyah Saad,Yaniv Nudelman,Rebecca T Brown,Shmuel Springer","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nMobility decline often begins in midlife and early identification of individuals at risk of accelerated deterioration can enable timely prevention. However, there is no validated self-report instrument that specifically assesses mobility in the middle-aged population.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe Mobility in Middle-Age Questionnaire (MMQ) was developed through a seven-step Delphi process, consisting of 10 experts, involving item selection and content validation in both English and Hebrew, comprising two factors: (1) Current Mobility Ability and (2) One-Year Mobility Change. Psychometric properties were assessed in 610 U.S. and 594 Israeli middle-aged adults. Analyses included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, structural and construct validity (using the 10-item Physical Functioning scale (PF-10) from SF-36), and floor/ceiling effect assessments. A 'Potential Mobility Risk Zone' was defined as the lowest 20% of MMQ scores.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe MMQ showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α  =  0.94 English; 0.92 Hebrew) and strong test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.89-0.90). Exploratory factor analysis explained 66% of variance; confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, SRMR = 0.05). Construct validity was supported, with all pre-defined hypotheses confirmed. MMQ showed significantly lower ceiling effects than PF-10 (3.9% vs. 34.5% in U.S.; 0.17% vs. 25.25% in Israel, p < .001, large effect sizes). A score of 50 (20th percentile) was proposed as a preliminary \"Potential Mobility Risk\" Threshold.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe MMQ is a reliable and valid tool for detecting early mobility decline in midlife. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm its predictive value and responsiveness to change.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Mobility decline often begins in midlife and early identification of individuals at risk of accelerated deterioration can enable timely prevention. However, there is no validated self-report instrument that specifically assesses mobility in the middle-aged population. METHODS The Mobility in Middle-Age Questionnaire (MMQ) was developed through a seven-step Delphi process, consisting of 10 experts, involving item selection and content validation in both English and Hebrew, comprising two factors: (1) Current Mobility Ability and (2) One-Year Mobility Change. Psychometric properties were assessed in 610 U.S. and 594 Israeli middle-aged adults. Analyses included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, structural and construct validity (using the 10-item Physical Functioning scale (PF-10) from SF-36), and floor/ceiling effect assessments. A 'Potential Mobility Risk Zone' was defined as the lowest 20% of MMQ scores. RESULTS The MMQ showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α  =  0.94 English; 0.92 Hebrew) and strong test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.89-0.90). Exploratory factor analysis explained 66% of variance; confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, SRMR = 0.05). Construct validity was supported, with all pre-defined hypotheses confirmed. MMQ showed significantly lower ceiling effects than PF-10 (3.9% vs. 34.5% in U.S.; 0.17% vs. 25.25% in Israel, p < .001, large effect sizes). A score of 50 (20th percentile) was proposed as a preliminary "Potential Mobility Risk" Threshold. CONCLUSIONS The MMQ is a reliable and valid tool for detecting early mobility decline in midlife. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm its predictive value and responsiveness to change.
中年人流动性问卷(MMQ)的编制与验证
活动能力下降通常始于中年,早期识别有加速退化风险的个体可以及时预防。然而,目前还没有有效的自我报告工具专门评估中年人口的流动性。方法由10位专家组成的《中年流动能力问卷》(MMQ)采用七步德尔菲法编制,包括英语和希伯来语两种语言的项目选择和内容验证。问卷包含两个因素:(1)当前流动能力和(2)一年流动能力变化。对610名美国儿童的心理测量特性进行了评估594名以色列中年人。分析包括内部一致性、测试重测信度、结构效度和构造效度(使用SF-36的10项身体功能量表(PF-10))以及地板/天花板效应评估。“潜在流动性风险区”被定义为MMQ得分最低的20%。结果MMQ具有良好的内部一致性(英语Cronbach′s α = 0.94;希伯来语Cronbach′s α = 0.92)和较强的重测信度(ICC = 0.89 ~ 0.90)。探索性因子分析解释了66%的方差;验证性因子分析拟合良好(CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, SRMR = 0.05)。结构效度得到支持,所有预先定义的假设都得到证实。MMQ的上限效应明显低于PF-10(美国为3.9% vs. 34.5%;以色列为0.17% vs. 25.25%, p < 0.001,效应量大)。50分(第20百分位)作为初步的“潜在流动风险”阈值。结论MMQ是一种可靠、有效的检测中年早期活动能力下降的工具。需要进行纵向研究来证实其预测价值和对变化的反应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信