Prevalence of Intravitreal Silicone Oil Following Intravitreal Injections: A Meta-Analysis: Silicone Oil Droplets After Intravitreal Injections.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Matheus Pedrotti Chavez,Tiago Nelson de Oliveira Rassi,Camilo Moreno Yate,Dillan Cunha Amaral,Larissa Matioski Brasil,Thaine Garcia Carvalho Vasconcelos,Geoffrey Guy Emerson,Maurício Maia,Gustavo Barreto Melo
{"title":"Prevalence of Intravitreal Silicone Oil Following Intravitreal Injections: A Meta-Analysis: Silicone Oil Droplets After Intravitreal Injections.","authors":"Matheus Pedrotti Chavez,Tiago Nelson de Oliveira Rassi,Camilo Moreno Yate,Dillan Cunha Amaral,Larissa Matioski Brasil,Thaine Garcia Carvalho Vasconcelos,Geoffrey Guy Emerson,Maurício Maia,Gustavo Barreto Melo","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.09.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TOPIC\r\nIntravitreal injections (IVIs) are used for retinal diseases, but concerns emerged regarding silicone oil (SiO) contamination, which may cause floaters and inflammation. This meta-analysis evaluated the prevalence of intravitreal SiO following IVIs, its association with floaters, and contributing factors.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL RELEVANCE\r\nSiO contamination may compromise visual quality, lead to inflammation, and patient dissatisfaction.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies reporting SiO prevalence after IVIs. We conducted a single-arm meta-analysis with subgroup analyses by syringe and needle types. We applied meta-regression to test whether SiO prevalence correlated with the number of injections per eye. We used a generalized linear mixed model to pool data and assessed heterogeneity with I².\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe included ten studies, comprising 1,583 eyes. The prevalence of intravitreal SiO following IVIs was 57.56% (95% CI: 40.45-73.03; I²=96%; very low certainty), and floaters occurred in 27.85% (95% CI: 14.59-46.58; I²=1%; very low certainty) of eyes. Staked-in needles showed higher SiO prevalence than attachable needles (72.33% vs 17.14%; p<0.01; very low certainty). SiO prevalence did not correlate with the number of injections (p=0.41). Post hoc analysis showed SiO-free syringes had significantly lower contamination rates than siliconized syringes (OR 0.05; 95% CI 0.02-0.12; I²=0%; p<0.01; moderate certainty).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIVIs are frequently associated with intravitreal SiO and floaters. Siliconized syringes and staked-in needles may increase contamination risk. Utilizing SiO-free syringes and attachable needles may reduce SiO-related complications. Randomized controlled trials should confirm these preventive strategies.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"194 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.09.043","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

TOPIC Intravitreal injections (IVIs) are used for retinal diseases, but concerns emerged regarding silicone oil (SiO) contamination, which may cause floaters and inflammation. This meta-analysis evaluated the prevalence of intravitreal SiO following IVIs, its association with floaters, and contributing factors. CLINICAL RELEVANCE SiO contamination may compromise visual quality, lead to inflammation, and patient dissatisfaction. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies reporting SiO prevalence after IVIs. We conducted a single-arm meta-analysis with subgroup analyses by syringe and needle types. We applied meta-regression to test whether SiO prevalence correlated with the number of injections per eye. We used a generalized linear mixed model to pool data and assessed heterogeneity with I². RESULTS We included ten studies, comprising 1,583 eyes. The prevalence of intravitreal SiO following IVIs was 57.56% (95% CI: 40.45-73.03; I²=96%; very low certainty), and floaters occurred in 27.85% (95% CI: 14.59-46.58; I²=1%; very low certainty) of eyes. Staked-in needles showed higher SiO prevalence than attachable needles (72.33% vs 17.14%; p<0.01; very low certainty). SiO prevalence did not correlate with the number of injections (p=0.41). Post hoc analysis showed SiO-free syringes had significantly lower contamination rates than siliconized syringes (OR 0.05; 95% CI 0.02-0.12; I²=0%; p<0.01; moderate certainty). CONCLUSIONS IVIs are frequently associated with intravitreal SiO and floaters. Siliconized syringes and staked-in needles may increase contamination risk. Utilizing SiO-free syringes and attachable needles may reduce SiO-related complications. Randomized controlled trials should confirm these preventive strategies.
玻璃体注射后玻璃体内硅油的流行:一项荟萃分析:玻璃体注射后硅油滴。
主题:玻璃体内注射(IVIs)用于视网膜疾病,但人们担心硅油(SiO)污染可能导致飞蚊症和炎症。本荟萃分析评估了静脉注射后玻璃体内SiO的患病率、其与飞蚊症的关系以及影响因素。临床意义io污染可能损害视觉质量,导致炎症和患者不满。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane,检索有关静脉注射后SiO患病率的研究。我们进行了单臂荟萃分析,并按注射器和针头类型进行亚组分析。我们应用meta回归检验SiO患病率是否与每只眼睛注射次数相关。我们使用广义线性混合模型汇集数据并使用I²评估异质性。结果纳入10项研究,共1583只眼。静脉注射后玻璃体内SiO发生率为57.56% (95% CI: 40.45-73.03; I²=96%;极低确定性),飞蚊发生率为27.85% (95% CI: 14.59-46.58; I²=1%;极低确定性)。置入针头的SiO患病率高于附着针头(72.33% vs 17.14%; p<0.01;极低确定性)。SiO患病率与注射次数无关(p=0.41)。事后分析显示,无硅注射器的污染率明显低于含硅注射器(OR 0.05; 95% CI 0.02-0.12; I²=0%;p<0.01;中等确定性)。结论sii常伴有玻璃体内SiO和飞蚊症。硅化注射器和插针可能会增加污染风险。使用不含sio的注射器和可连接的针头可以减少sio相关的并发症。随机对照试验应证实这些预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信