Exploration of constructing a relatively comprehensive syndrome differentiation and treatment system based on dialectical materialism principles.

Zhang Gedi, Wen Xiaoli, Tao Tianming, Yan Ziyou, Liu Hongning
{"title":"Exploration of constructing a relatively comprehensive syndrome differentiation and treatment system based on dialectical materialism principles.","authors":"Zhang Gedi, Wen Xiaoli, Tao Tianming, Yan Ziyou, Liu Hongning","doi":"10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20250318.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is well known that Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has two outstanding academic characteristics: the holistic concept comes from <i>Huang Di Nei Jing</i>, and the syndrome differentiation and treatment comes from <i>Shang Han Lun</i>. These two characteristics denote the two major academic systems of TCM: one is the medical system of <i>Huang Di Nei Jing</i>, also named syndrome differentiation and treatment system of <i>Zang-Fu</i> organs and meridians, focuses on theoretical exploration, which highlights functional connection and emphasizes philosophical thinking. The treatment in this system is based on physiological functions by taking <i>Zang-Fu</i> organs as the main body, <i>Qi</i>, blood, essence, and body fluid as the auxiliary body, and the meridians and collaterals as the connection channels. The other is the syndrome differentiation and treatment system of the six meridians, which emphasizes clinical practice. It encompasses the idea that the six meridians govern various diseases, emphasizes the disease sites and divisional treatment, and pays attention to the precision and appropriateness of prescription-syndrome differentiation. These two academic systems, with mutual influences and relations, are both the essence and pearl of TCM, nevertheless, there are obvious differences between the two in clinical application, so they should be distinguished. This paper will elaborate on the connection and difference between them, and how to organically combine the two systems for better application in clinical practice of TCM.</p>","PeriodicalId":94119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan","volume":"45 5","pages":"1164-1168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20250318.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well known that Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has two outstanding academic characteristics: the holistic concept comes from Huang Di Nei Jing, and the syndrome differentiation and treatment comes from Shang Han Lun. These two characteristics denote the two major academic systems of TCM: one is the medical system of Huang Di Nei Jing, also named syndrome differentiation and treatment system of Zang-Fu organs and meridians, focuses on theoretical exploration, which highlights functional connection and emphasizes philosophical thinking. The treatment in this system is based on physiological functions by taking Zang-Fu organs as the main body, Qi, blood, essence, and body fluid as the auxiliary body, and the meridians and collaterals as the connection channels. The other is the syndrome differentiation and treatment system of the six meridians, which emphasizes clinical practice. It encompasses the idea that the six meridians govern various diseases, emphasizes the disease sites and divisional treatment, and pays attention to the precision and appropriateness of prescription-syndrome differentiation. These two academic systems, with mutual influences and relations, are both the essence and pearl of TCM, nevertheless, there are obvious differences between the two in clinical application, so they should be distinguished. This paper will elaborate on the connection and difference between them, and how to organically combine the two systems for better application in clinical practice of TCM.

基于辩证唯物主义原则构建较为全面的辨证论治体系的探索。
众所周知,中医有两个突出的学术特点:整体观来自《黄帝内经》,辨证论治来自《商汉论》。这两个特点代表了中医的两大学术体系:一是《黄帝内经》医学体系,又称脏腑经络辨证论治体系,注重理论探索,突出功能联系,强调哲学思考;该系统的治疗以生理功能为基础,以脏腑为主体,以气、血、精、津液为辅助体,以经络为联系渠道。另一种是强调临床实践的六经辨证论治体系。它包含了六经治各种疾病的思想,强调疾病部位和分治,注意辨证辨证的准确性和适当性。这两种学术体系相互影响、相互联系,是中医的精华和明珠,但在临床应用上存在明显差异,应加以区分。本文将阐述两者之间的联系和区别,以及如何将两者有机地结合起来,以便更好地在中医临床实践中应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信