E R Rozhivanova, R V Rozhivanov, E N Andreeva, G А Mel'nichenko, N G Mokrysheva
{"title":"[Restoration of ejaculate quality following androgen replacement and combined therapy for hypogonadism].","authors":"E R Rozhivanova, R V Rozhivanov, E N Andreeva, G А Mel'nichenko, N G Mokrysheva","doi":"10.14341/probl13545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To optimize androgen replacement therapy for male hypogonadism to improve reproductive prospects.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of restoring the quality of ejaculate in men receiving androgen replacement therapy (AZT) and patients receiving course combination therapy with testosterone and chorionic gonadotropin (AZT/HG).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In observational prospective study was included 53 men observed at The National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology and AZT (n=19) or AZT/HG (n=34) more than 5 years, followed by stimulating gonadotropin therapy. The qualitative parameters of ejaculate were evaluated in all patients. The basic level of statistical significance was p<0,05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient groups were comparable in age, BMI, duration of therapy used, type of testosterone preparation, as well as the etiology of hypogonadism. Sperm concentration in the AZT group there was a statistically significant negative dynamics, while in the ART/HG group, there were no statistically significant differences in the dynamics of sperm concentration. Statistically significant differences in the value of sperm concentration change were revealed. In both groups was observed statistically significant negative dynamics for sperm motility and morphology. There were no statistically significant differences in the value of changes motility and sperm morphology in both studied groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Course combination therapy with testosterone and chorionic gonadotropin is characterized by better results for sperm concentration restoration compared with androgenic replacement therapy. For the restoration of sperm motility and morphology both methods do not show satisfactory results.</p>","PeriodicalId":101419,"journal":{"name":"Problemy endokrinologii","volume":"71 4","pages":"77-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy endokrinologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14341/probl13545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To optimize androgen replacement therapy for male hypogonadism to improve reproductive prospects.
Aim: To compare the effectiveness of restoring the quality of ejaculate in men receiving androgen replacement therapy (AZT) and patients receiving course combination therapy with testosterone and chorionic gonadotropin (AZT/HG).
Materials and methods: In observational prospective study was included 53 men observed at The National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology and AZT (n=19) or AZT/HG (n=34) more than 5 years, followed by stimulating gonadotropin therapy. The qualitative parameters of ejaculate were evaluated in all patients. The basic level of statistical significance was p<0,05.
Results: The patient groups were comparable in age, BMI, duration of therapy used, type of testosterone preparation, as well as the etiology of hypogonadism. Sperm concentration in the AZT group there was a statistically significant negative dynamics, while in the ART/HG group, there were no statistically significant differences in the dynamics of sperm concentration. Statistically significant differences in the value of sperm concentration change were revealed. In both groups was observed statistically significant negative dynamics for sperm motility and morphology. There were no statistically significant differences in the value of changes motility and sperm morphology in both studied groups.
Conclusion: Course combination therapy with testosterone and chorionic gonadotropin is characterized by better results for sperm concentration restoration compared with androgenic replacement therapy. For the restoration of sperm motility and morphology both methods do not show satisfactory results.